Jump to content


The Quirks Of, 'Player Rating'.


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

OIias_of_Sunhillow #1 Posted 08 August 2018 - 11:47 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 24544 battles
  • 2,545
  • Member since:
    07-20-2011

Just checking my player rating, by vehicle.

In my M53/M55, overall, 126th place.

Damage dealt, 74th place.

Win ratio during that same period, 608th place. With a win ratio of 36%. :amazed: Yoiks..!

 

Ropey teams ?



XxKuzkina_MatxX #2 Posted 09 August 2018 - 01:20 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 49607 battles
  • 1,760
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016
Simple and direct interpretation of data: Irrelevant

Wintermute_1 #3 Posted 09 August 2018 - 09:50 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44219 battles
  • 1,568
  • Member since:
    11-25-2013
How many games does that relate to? The smaller the number the weirder the stats can look. I'd certainly expect the 36% win rate to even out eventually though. Which is good because its expensive getting killed in arty alot.

Geno1isme #4 Posted 09 August 2018 - 10:13 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 42622 battles
  • 7,839
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

View PostWintermute_1, on 09 August 2018 - 10:50 AM, said:

How many games does that relate to? The smaller the number the weirder the stats can look. I'd certainly expect the 36% win rate to even out eventually though. Which is good because its expensive getting killed in arty alot.

 

He's talking about the Hall-of-Fame for August. Which is a nonsense ranking to even begin with.

tumppi776 #5 Posted 09 August 2018 - 10:38 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 42668 battles
  • 2,303
  • Member since:
    01-27-2014

Better than my Sheridan 12th with 14% wins - classic.

14.29% 1,387 577 0.57 1,902



Dr_ownape #6 Posted 09 August 2018 - 10:43 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 43374 battles
  • 5,482
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013
i only look at "since dec 2014". but there's a reason for that :playing:

fwhaatpiraat #7 Posted 09 August 2018 - 11:04 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 47158 battles
  • 673
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

View PostDr_ownape, on 09 August 2018 - 10:43 AM, said:

i only look at "since dec 2014". but there's a reason for that :playing:

 

You should look at the ratings for the 212a since december 2014 :trollface:

Dr_ownape #8 Posted 09 August 2018 - 11:29 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 43374 battles
  • 5,482
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

View Postfwhaatpiraat, on 09 August 2018 - 10:04 AM, said:

 

You should look at the ratings for the 212a since december 2014 :trollface:

 

i can't decide whether I'm impressed or disgusted

NoobySkooby #9 Posted 09 August 2018 - 11:32 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 13025 battles
  • 2,792
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

What with XVM and rating available to all and sundry they should be hidden or request sent to view them, remove view for all, most of the toxicity in game would vanish.

 

But then I don't give a rats [edited], when my premium account is up that when it is all up, over and done with.



Bordhaw #10 Posted 09 August 2018 - 11:51 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 11543 battles
  • 2,481
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostOIias_of_Sunhillow, on 08 August 2018 - 10:47 PM, said:

Just checking my player rating, by vehicle.

In my M53/M55, overall, 126th place.

Damage dealt, 74th place.

Win ratio during that same period, 608th place. With a win ratio of 36%. :amazed: Yoiks..!

 

Ropey teams ?

 

You have to had played 50 battles in whatever tank you looking at. So, as more players play and get to 50 battles then your place should eventually drop. 




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users