Jump to content


Pref mm tanks buff


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

Zinomov #1 Posted 09 August 2018 - 02:32 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20604 battles
  • 222
  • [DIGIN] DIGIN
  • Member since:
    10-13-2014

I like what they r doing so far by giving these tanks a bit more of a boost to the gun parameters

 

But im sure as hell NOT happy with the fact that they wanna buff the armor

 

Type 59 getting 230 mm of turret armor ? Stop breaking the game wg you *****

 

If u kept historical accuracy we woulden't be in this mess -_-

 

Anyway who agree with those tweaks and if anyone has better alternatives let us know



Negativvv #2 Posted 09 August 2018 - 02:39 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 8993 battles
  • 1,015
  • [KEKE] KEKE
  • Member since:
    08-08-2015
You lost me when you mentioned WG and historical accuracy :trollface:

lgfrbcsgo #3 Posted 09 August 2018 - 02:48 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 30301 battles
  • 1,016
  • [MOTIV] MOTIV
  • Member since:
    04-04-2012

View PostZinomov, on 09 August 2018 - 02:32 PM, said:

Type 59 getting 230 mm of turret armor ?

 

Source? The official news article doesn't mention the exact armour buffs.



Balc0ra #4 Posted 09 August 2018 - 02:49 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66298 battles
  • 16,320
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

For everyone that don't like the turret buffs, there are 6 more that want's it. It's been widely asked for since the T-44's etc got their buffs. 

 

View PostZinomov, on 09 August 2018 - 02:32 PM, said:

If u kept historical accuracy we woulden't be in this mess -_-

 

No then we would be in a mess on the other side of the scale for most tanks sadly. As have been shown before many metas ago on most of the tanks. It's more or less why balance comes before historical accuracy. 

 

 

View Postlgfrbcsgo, on 09 August 2018 - 02:48 PM, said:

 

Source? The official news article doesn't mention the exact armour buffs.

 

2nd round of super tests for the Pref MM buffs have started. Type 59 is testing 230mm turret armor. But again it's testing. It's not final. 

 


Edited by Balc0ra, 09 August 2018 - 02:50 PM.


xtrem3x #5 Posted 09 August 2018 - 02:53 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32296 battles
  • 1,468
  • [EFE-X] EFE-X
  • Member since:
    01-03-2013

View PostBalc0ra, on 09 August 2018 - 01:49 PM, said:

 

2nd round of super tests for the Pref MM buffs have started. Type 59 is testing 230mm turret armor. But again it's testing. It's not final. 

 

 

I don't see a problem with this



Zinomov #6 Posted 09 August 2018 - 03:30 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20604 battles
  • 222
  • [DIGIN] DIGIN
  • Member since:
    10-13-2014
T44 turret buff ?
But the type59's turret is roundish which makes it better for bouncing most tier 9s
Unless it faces a tier9 td ofc

TheOneAboveAII #7 Posted 09 August 2018 - 03:31 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14359 battles
  • 488
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    07-14-2016
Type gettin 230mm of armour and better gun stats? And keeps the premium mm? Oh boy...Can’t wait to put the buffs live...I’m gonna club some seals...hard...

TheOneAboveAII #8 Posted 09 August 2018 - 03:38 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14359 battles
  • 488
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    07-14-2016

View PostZinomov, on 09 August 2018 - 02:30 PM, said:

T44 turret buff ?
But the type59's turret is roundish which makes it better for bouncing most tier 9s
Unless it faces a tier9 td ofc

Just give it a rest...let other nations have their fair share of OPness as well...rasha had enough.



Browarszky #9 Posted 09 August 2018 - 05:41 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16096 battles
  • 3,737
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostTheOneAboveAII, on 09 August 2018 - 02:38 PM, said:

Just give it a rest...let other nations have their fair share of OPness as well...rasha had enough.

 

My IS-6 wanted me to send you a short, tightly worded letter though.

Kommandant_Mia #10 Posted 09 August 2018 - 06:32 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 902 battles
  • 193
  • Member since:
    08-27-2011
Meanwhile the T34-3 is wondering how "same armour values" suddenly don't apply anymore.  

Honestly though,  I rather see them get a better engine.

Balc0ra #11 Posted 09 August 2018 - 08:05 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66298 battles
  • 16,320
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostZinomov, on 09 August 2018 - 03:30 PM, said:

T44 turret buff ?
But the type59's turret is roundish which makes it better for bouncing most tier 9s
Unless it faces a tier9 td ofc

 

Indeed. The Type don't have 200mm all around it head on. Like the T-44 it's 130mm to 160mm impact armor on the cheeks and side. It still gives way more effective armor on the Type-59 indeed in that area, but it's still 300+ effective on both. T-44 just had its 140mm area next to the mantle before the cheeks buffed to 220ish effective armor to name one. 

 

But if you look at the Type 59 on tank GG. You will notice it's 280 to 230mm next to the mantle even now. And a 200mm area next to that again before the 160mm cheeks starts. And a 200mm strip under the gun and on the mantle. For all we know, it's that area that is going to 230. Most of the turret head on is already on 230 or more. As in impact armor, not effective armor.  

 

 

 

 

 


Edited by Balc0ra, 09 August 2018 - 08:05 PM.


Mike_Mckay #12 Posted 10 August 2018 - 09:10 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20532 battles
  • 1,552
  • [-AWF-] -AWF-
  • Member since:
    09-02-2015

View PostZinomov, on 09 August 2018 - 01:32 PM, said:

I like what they r doing so far by giving these tanks a bit more of a boost to the gun parameters

 

But im sure as hell NOT happy with the fact that they wanna buff the armor

 

Type 59 getting 230 mm of turret armor ? Stop breaking the game wg you *****

 

If u kept historical accuracy we woulden't be in this mess -_-

 

Anyway who agree with those tweaks and if anyone has better alternatives let us know

 

Firstly even for PMM tanks I don't think the penetration buffs go far enough on most of them

And as for the armour, many of them are so crippled the proposed armour buffs still wont stop tier 9s from tearing the tier 8 PMM tanks to shreds like theyre made out of tissue paper

WG should just scrap the tier based MM system complete as they have totally screwed it up with a combination of OP tanks and powercrept tanks. And they should pick the teams based on their actual parameters instead of their tier as some tanks are so pathetic they would be better suited to being matched with tanks 2 tiers lower and others would be more at home with tanks a tier or 2 higher


That way they can introduce all the OP game breaking tanks they want and they WONT break the game because they will be placed in games based on their stats not the irrelevant tier designation they are given

adameitas #13 Posted 10 August 2018 - 11:54 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 63314 battles
  • 849
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

well main problem about t59 is being too sluggish. So i hope those 60 hp gonna help, rof and armor buffs are good but i would change them for more HP anytime.

adding those 7-8 to 175 pen wont change anything. Those tanks needs at least 195-200. Or add better ROF then.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users