Jump to content


NOOBR - New meta for players rating!


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

Bora_BOOM #1 Posted 10 August 2018 - 01:42 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 23657 battles
  • 3,105
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

Well, you all know that we, the Dingers, like to be constructive. Usually. Sometimes. Maybe.

And you also know how every (and I will add failed) rating so far measures how good you are?

Well, not any more!

 

NOOBR!  The best rating ever, the one that can make anyone look amazing!

 

1. Go to Noobmeter (or any other site that can provide you with this info) and look at your stats

2. Find and pick the worst the "very best" tank you have with the following conditions: Tier 6-10, at least 150 games played (max 500 battles cause my equation sucks and I don’t like statpadding).

3. Fine tune your results by picking date intervals if you want.

4. Then, insert the numbers in this equation: NOOBR = (battles / WR) * (10 / (10+tank tier))

Spoiler

 

You will have something like this (cry and beat me baby):

Results for Jan 11, 2015 11:06:40 AM to Sep 10, 2015 12:00:43 PM for Bora_BOOM:

1 E-50 MT DE 9 454 39.43%

So, my NOOBR = (454/39,43)*(10/(10+9))= 6,06 :great:

Give us your noob qualities, bois. We know you all have some. Even you, you unicas. Don’t be afraid... :trollface:


Edited by Bora_BOOM, 10 August 2018 - 02:29 PM.


Emeraldweed #2 Posted 10 August 2018 - 01:51 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 10440 battles
  • 938
  • [-322-] -322-
  • Member since:
    05-14-2012
Posted Image

Nethraniel #3 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:00 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 13535 battles
  • 2,234
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

Just realized, I am totally bad at this...

 

 

this is seriously my 'best' ranked tank:


 

T-34-85 | 309 battles | 55.34% WR | NOOBR = 3.49


 

all my other tanks with >150 battles have lower NOOBR... :amazed:



Bora_BOOM #4 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:00 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 23657 battles
  • 3,105
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View PostEmeraldweed, on 10 August 2018 - 12:51 PM, said:

Posted Image

 

Results for May 12, 2014 5:14:37 PM to Aug 2, 2014 5:39:05 PM for Emeraldweed:

PzKpfw VI Tiger HT DE 7 435 53.10%

NOOBR = 4,81

Is this the best that you can? :teethhappy:

 



TheDrownedApe #5 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:05 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 44661 battles
  • 5,645
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

Thanks to Pershing's mighty 241 battles with 44.67% WR NOOBR = 3.03



Emeraldweed #6 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:07 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 10440 battles
  • 938
  • [-322-] -322-
  • Member since:
    05-14-2012

View PostBora_BOOM, on 10 August 2018 - 04:00 PM, said:

 

Results for May 12, 2014 5:14:37 PM to Aug 2, 2014 5:39:05 PM for Emeraldweed:

PzKpfw VI Tiger HT DE 7 435 53.10%

NOOBR = 4,81

Is this the best that you can? :teethhappy:

 

 

nooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :teethhappy:

Bexleyheath #7 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:07 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5858 battles
  • 361
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    01-07-2018
Löwe HT DE 8 215 48.84%

 

Wouldnt you need to play a minimum of 10,000 in a single tank for the winrate to be statisticly significant? 

 

my NOOBR is 2.42 is that good or bad? :ohmy:


Edited by Bexleyheath, 10 August 2018 - 02:12 PM.


Bora_BOOM #8 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:09 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 23657 battles
  • 3,105
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View PostBexleyheath, on 10 August 2018 - 01:07 PM, said:

Wouldnt you need to play a minimum of 10,000 in a single tank for the winrate to be statisticly significant? 

 

my NOOBR is 2.42 is that good or bad? :ohmy:

 

That is why 500 battle max is there.

And 10k in a single tank is padding.

And no, 2.42 is crap. :teethhappy:

 

Which is great. You are only a fish away!


Edited by Bora_BOOM, 10 August 2018 - 02:11 PM.


Bora_BOOM #9 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:12 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 23657 battles
  • 3,105
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View PostBexleyheath, on 10 August 2018 - 01:07 PM, said:

Löwe HT DE 8 215 48.84%

 

2.44

 

Meh. :trollface:



kaneloon #10 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:19 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28684 battles
  • 1,915
  • [OBLIC] OBLIC
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011

Lttb : 452 battles and 46.46 : 5.4 :izmena:

Worst is Emil II with 1.79.

 

Problem with this formula is that any tiers 6 tank near 500 battles will have a high noobr.


Edited by kaneloon, 10 August 2018 - 02:38 PM.


UrQuan #11 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:33 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20089 battles
  • 6,522
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-19-2011

Damn, I suck at this rating. Battle count interval must be between 150 & 500 & tiers between 6 to 10. My 'best' tank in that interval is the T8 premium T34, from my noob days, with 350 battles played & 48% WR. Gives me a NOOBR rating of 4.00.

 



Aimless #12 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:35 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 23458 battles
  • 2,605
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-19-2010

either NOOBR or my understanding in maths seems to be broken in a way.

 

M7 (219/46.6)*(10/(10+5)) = 3,09

T54 (325/43.7)*(10/(10+9)) = 3,86

E50 (183/44.3)*(10/(10+9)) = 2,14   huh???

IS-3 (409/59.9)*(10/(10+8)) = 3,75   WTF!!!

 

so my second highest NOOBR is in a tier 8 tank I played with a 60% WR?

 

:amazed:



Makotti #13 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:37 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 14570 battles
  • 315
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-04-2010
Damn, 2 games away that I can submit my JgTg88-score :ohmy:

Bora_BOOM #14 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:38 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 23657 battles
  • 3,105
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View PostMakotti, on 10 August 2018 - 01:37 PM, said:

Damn, 2 games away that I can submit my JgTg88-score :ohmy:

 

Well, you better drown twice. And TK might help.

kaneloon #15 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:43 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28684 battles
  • 1,915
  • [OBLIC] OBLIC
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011

10 seems the max : 499 battles at tiers 6 and 31% wr.

Difficult to make worst ... I meant better.



Bora_BOOM #16 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:45 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 23657 battles
  • 3,105
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View PostAimless, on 10 August 2018 - 01:35 PM, said:

either NOOBR or my understanding in maths seems to be broken in a way.

 

M7 (219/46.6)*(10/(10+5)) = 3,09

T54 (325/43.7)*(10/(10+9)) = 3,86

E50 (183/44.3)*(10/(10+9)) = 2,14   huh???

IS-3 (409/59.9)*(10/(10+8)) = 3,75   WTF!!!

 

so my second highest NOOBR is in a tier 8 tank I played with a 60% WR?

 

:amazed:

 

Working as intended.

Because the battle count is low it is reasonable to expect that the player has stopped playing the particular tank cause the WR was low.

Real noobs keep playing when WR is low. They like it that way. They dont stop. They are dedicated.

:teethhappy:


Edited by Bora_BOOM, 10 August 2018 - 02:45 PM.


Bora_BOOM #17 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:47 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 23657 battles
  • 3,105
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View PostUrQuan, on 10 August 2018 - 01:33 PM, said:

Damn, I suck at this rating. Battle count interval must be between 150 & 500 & tiers between 6 to 10. My 'best' tank in that interval is the T8 premium T34, from my noob days, with 350 battles played & 48% WR. Gives me a NOOBR rating of 4.00.

 

 

Aimless dreams about reaching 4. He tries so hard, he has calculated 4 different tanks. :trollface:

Edited by Bora_BOOM, 10 August 2018 - 02:49 PM.


PervyPastryPuffer #18 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:50 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 31588 battles
  • 2,385
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

Hmmm...

 

Best:

T30 (222/62,61)*[10/(10+9)] = 1,86

 

Worst:

T29 (172/45,93)*[10/(10+7)] = 2,20

 

I don't get how this works, but it doesn't. :sceptic:

 

Edit: TOG II* (381/56,96)*[10/(10+6)] = 4,18 ...okay :confused:


Edited by Tankyouverymuch2, 10 August 2018 - 02:54 PM.


gunslingerXXX #19 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:53 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 11384 battles
  • 2,247
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014

Finally a rating where my superb play in the BC 25ap is useful!

234 battles, 34.19% wr  > 3.6 :teethhappy:

 

Edit: damn, I need to increase the number of battles I suck. Too bad I used 60k xp from last weekend :amazed:


Edited by gunslingerXXX, 10 August 2018 - 02:55 PM.


Bora_BOOM #20 Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:57 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 23657 battles
  • 3,105
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View PostTankyouverymuch2, on 10 August 2018 - 01:50 PM, said:

Hmmm...

 

Best:

T30 (222/62,61)*[10/(10+9)] = 1,86

 

Worst:

T29 (172/45,93)*[10/(10+7)] = 2,20

 

I don't get how this works, but it doesn't. :sceptic:

 

Sure it works. You are just bad at being noob. :B




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users