Jump to content


Leo 1 doesn't need buff - proof


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

OdysseusKrieg #1 Posted 22 August 2018 - 12:23 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 12804 battles
  • 153
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

Even Quickybaby said that the leo 1 is fine in the current meta.

In before ''leo 1 player must have been a tomato''


 

 

If anything should be buffed it's the Russian mediums.



Naive #2 Posted 22 August 2018 - 12:59 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 1269 battles
  • 61
  • Member since:
    06-03-2012
0/10

Metalsniper #3 Posted 22 August 2018 - 02:14 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20568 battles
  • 626
  • [WHEN] WHEN
  • Member since:
    03-01-2012
Personally only thing it needs is better gun handling especially aim time and that is it. Whilst stb1 needs the same and hydropneumatic suspension

Brownape #4 Posted 22 August 2018 - 08:57 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7680 battles
  • 392
  • Member since:
    01-10-2015
am i getting to the point of just buying it and seeing what it's like. But the thought of spending 6 mil on a whim is stopping me. I love the alpha and gun on the PTA as it can easily challenge TX meds in most >100m confrontations. BUT it also faces T7s which is just lulz.

TungstenHitman #5 Posted 22 August 2018 - 09:07 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 24176 battles
  • 4,398
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016
Pls close thread and the OP flogged to the minimum of 12 times

Balc0ra #6 Posted 22 August 2018 - 10:55 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 67384 battles
  • 17,089
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

For all we know he played it aggressive, got isolated early and died brawling Russian meds, that are brawlers not support meds. Going by the map and where the meds go, it's not unlikely. As it's like comparing the Maus vs the 50b in terms of role on the HT line. A reloading 50B is not gonna do much vs it. 

 

Still... vs the AMX 30 B it needs a buff. Not vs the Obj 907. As vs another support med it's terrible. As I saw no reason to get the Leo 1 after I played the AMX 30. I even sold the Leo PT A after I got that. 



HaZardeur #7 Posted 22 August 2018 - 11:08 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 34515 battles
  • 1,276
  • Member since:
    08-14-2010
OP watches QB and therefor lost already all his credibility...

doriansky1 #8 Posted 22 August 2018 - 11:10 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30515 battles
  • 229
  • [SKIL1] SKIL1
  • Member since:
    12-14-2015
QB also said that 268v4 has "decent armor". Decent.

Metalsniper #9 Posted 22 August 2018 - 11:10 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20568 battles
  • 626
  • [WHEN] WHEN
  • Member since:
    03-01-2012

View PostHaZardeur, on 22 August 2018 - 11:08 AM, said:

OP watches QB and therefor lost already all his credibility...

Don't be a jealous fart he has a hot wife and makes lots of money playing games with 5k viewers on his live streams.

10:11 Added after 1 minute
Not to mention he's a better player than you

TungstenHitman #10 Posted 22 August 2018 - 11:12 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 24176 battles
  • 4,398
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016

View PostBalc0ra, on 22 August 2018 - 09:55 AM, said:

For all we know he played it aggressive, got isolated early and died brawling Russian meds, that are brawlers not support meds. Going by the map and where the meds go, it's not unlikely. As it's like comparing the Maus vs the 50b in terms of role on the HT line. A reloading 50B is not gonna do much vs it. 

 

Still... vs the AMX 30 B it needs a buff. Not vs the Obj 907. As vs another support med it's terrible. As I saw no reason to get the Leo 1 after I played the AMX 30. I even sold the Leo PT A after I got that. 

 

Ya true but the thread is ridiculous he displays one battle, adds "Quickibaby" to it like that make it credible and so based on just 1 battle with some random player we who may be good, may be bad, may have had connection issues, a bad PC who knows, we are supposed to entertain it? I could attach a battle result in which ANY tank you can name does bad, and any player too for that matter. If I attached a battle in which a Type5 and a Bobject did zero damage, is that a credible basis for saying they both need a buff lol? Now we already know the Leopard is made of paper and has German soft stats, so why attach some random battle report? Or is it just some "look at me I mentioned a streamer everyone loves" sort of thing? That featured battle, a T-54 does zero damage, it's on Ruinberg which is not going to suit a Leopards playsytle(not that many maps do anymore) and the Streamer is using a Swedish Cheese-wedge which is the most situation tank in the game and I was really annoyed yesterday when one of those bloody things cost us a battle on Mountain Pass in which the stupid Swedish TD was top tier and they got some armored beast TD instead and all he could do is [edited]around the map and get shot and fail in and out of siege mode... terrible. 

HaZardeur #11 Posted 22 August 2018 - 11:22 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 34515 battles
  • 1,276
  • Member since:
    08-14-2010

View PostMetalsniper, on 22 August 2018 - 11:10 AM, said:

Don't be a jealous fart he has a hot wife and makes lots of money playing games with 5k viewers on his live streams.

10:11 Added after 1 minute
Not to mention he's a better player than you

 

All unrelevant when person in question says "Defender not OP" to boost WG sales numbers instead of telling the truth. He relies on WG and therefor he is not an objective source of information.

 

edit: You really hurt me telling me that he is a better player then me :(


Edited by HaZardeur, 22 August 2018 - 11:23 AM.


Metalsniper #12 Posted 22 August 2018 - 11:24 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20568 battles
  • 626
  • [WHEN] WHEN
  • Member since:
    03-01-2012

View PostHaZardeur, on 22 August 2018 - 11:22 AM, said:

 

All unrelevant when person in question says "Defender not OP" to boost WG sales numbers instead of telling the truth. He relies on WG and therefor he is not an objective source of information.

 

edit: You really hurt me telling me that he is a better player then me :(

I had him say it's op numerous of times 



tank276 #13 Posted 22 August 2018 - 11:26 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 50593 battles
  • 591
  • [KEKE] KEKE
  • Member since:
    08-30-2012

View PostBrownape, on 22 August 2018 - 07:57 AM, said:

am i getting to the point of just buying it and seeing what it's like. But the thought of spending 6 mil on a whim is stopping me. I love the alpha and gun on the PTA as it can easily challenge TX meds in most >100m confrontations. BUT it also faces T7s which is just lulz.

 

It would not be a bad idea to stay at the PTA for the reasons you stated above.

Unfortunately have sold mine and thinking of rebuying it, tier to tier must be more competitive than the t10 to say the least.



OdysseusKrieg #14 Posted 22 August 2018 - 12:38 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 12804 battles
  • 153
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

View PostTungstenHitman, on 22 August 2018 - 11:12 AM, said:

 

Ya true but the thread is ridiculous he displays one battle, adds "Quickibaby" to it like that make it credible and so based on just 1 battle with some random player we who may be good, may be bad, may have had connection issues, a bad PC who knows, we are supposed to entertain it? I could attach a battle result in which ANY tank you can name does bad, and any player too for that matter. If I attached a battle in which a Type5 and a Bobject did zero damage, is that a credible basis for saying they both need a buff lol? Now we already know the Leopard is made of paper and has German soft stats, so why attach some random battle report? Or is it just some "look at me I mentioned a streamer everyone loves" sort of thing? That featured battle, a T-54 does zero damage, it's on Ruinberg which is not going to suit a Leopards playsytle(not that many maps do anymore) and the Streamer is using a Swedish Cheese-wedge which is the most situation tank in the game and I was really annoyed yesterday when one of those bloody things cost us a battle on Mountain Pass in which the stupid Swedish TD was top tier and they got some armored beast TD instead and all he could do is [edited]around the map and get shot and fail in and out of siege mode... terrible.

 



Warzey #15 Posted 22 August 2018 - 01:58 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 57424 battles
  • 964
  • [GOOFY] GOOFY
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

False alarm boys, Leopard is fine

 

Spoiler

 



Enforcer1975 #16 Posted 22 August 2018 - 02:16 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20973 battles
  • 10,927
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View PostWarzey, on 22 August 2018 - 01:58 PM, said:

False alarm boys, Leopard is fine

 

Spoiler

 

 

Granted i have only played it a couple times on SB but it actually felt pretty ok to me. Sure it doesn't have armor like the russian tanks but on my skill level i was pretty close in damage output on the Leo1, M48, B-C and T50 with the T50 standing out because i could use it's DPM way better and i already mentioned this before but imo the T50 is a clickerwagon that doesn't need skill that much skill to do damage in a short time. You only need an opportunity to open up on an unsuspecting enemy then run away or stay where you are if you are already bush camping like a boss. B-C imo was a bit gimped compared to the other 3 meds i mentioned.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users