Jump to content


Todays lesson


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

BR33K1_PAWAH #1 Posted 01 September 2018 - 10:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 3597 battles
  • 547
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018

So i just had one realy scatchy assault on Siegfried Line, and here's the thing i learned from that game: it's always that low tier skilled player on your team that will let you get another victory.

 

shot_005.jpgshot_006.jpg

 

Kudos to this guy - he made the difference which eventually swinged the tide of battle in our favor. Cheers indeed.



PhooBar #2 Posted 02 September 2018 - 12:00 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 18840 battles
  • 2,345
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-22-2013

OP is being nice.  Telling team member GJ on a public forum?

He seems to be serious.

Too much positive energy in this thread.

 

MODERATOR!



lord_chipmonk #3 Posted 02 September 2018 - 12:01 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 34108 battles
  • 10,257
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012

Hey, no naming and shaming praising allowed!!

 

Seriously though, nice to see a positive thread. :)



Enforcer1975 #4 Posted 02 September 2018 - 08:13 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20760 battles
  • 10,887
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
51% WR isn't low skilled anymore. Still nice to see positive things in the forum.

clixor #5 Posted 02 September 2018 - 11:43 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 51862 battles
  • 3,072
  • Member since:
    08-07-2011
WR isn't the only metric to go by, this guy has a pretty decent average XP and DMG. But i agree this does show that, even as bottom tier, you shouldn't yolo and try your best.

Aikl #6 Posted 02 September 2018 - 11:52 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25705 battles
  • 4,349
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostEnforcer1975, on 02 September 2018 - 07:13 AM, said:

51% WR isn't low skilled anymore. Still nice to see positive things in the forum.

 

Pretty sure it's supposed to mean 'skilled player in a low-tier tank'.

CmdRatScabies #7 Posted 02 September 2018 - 11:54 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 37626 battles
  • 4,457
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015

View PostEnforcer1975, on 02 September 2018 - 08:13 AM, said:

51% WR isn't low skilled anymore. Still nice to see positive things in the forum.

 

"low TIER skilled player...………….."

No doubt there are lots of games where a low skill player also makes a critical difference but I suspect the OP has a particular expectation bias on this.


Edited by CmdRatScabies, 02 September 2018 - 11:57 AM.


imperiumgraecum #8 Posted 02 September 2018 - 11:55 AM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 61551 battles
  • 2,860
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    01-03-2011

View PostEnforcer1975, on 02 September 2018 - 09:13 AM, said:

51% WR isn't low skilled anymore. Still nice to see positive things in the forum.

 

Anything below 60% is considered low-skilled

Baldrickk #9 Posted 02 September 2018 - 12:13 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 30307 battles
  • 14,502
  • [-TAH-] -TAH-
  • Member since:
    03-03-2013

View Postimperiumgraecum, on 02 September 2018 - 11:55 AM, said:

 

Anything below 60% is considered low-skilled

Global or recent? 

Some people take time to get better.

 

Speaking of, If I point out his battle count, is the observation that he should be pulling his weight in battles after that many times playing being too snarky for this positive thread?

 



BR33K1_PAWAH #10 Posted 02 September 2018 - 02:45 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 3597 battles
  • 547
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018

View Postimperiumgraecum, on 02 September 2018 - 01:55 PM, said:

 

Anything below 60% is considered low-skilled

Oh, rly?

 

View PostBaldrickk, on 02 September 2018 - 02:13 PM, said:

Speaking of, If I point out his battle count, is the observation that he should be pulling his weight in battles after that many times playing being too snarky for this positive thread?

You such a spoiler you



JocMeister #11 Posted 02 September 2018 - 02:50 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 23616 battles
  • 2,149
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View Postimperiumgraecum, on 02 September 2018 - 11:55 AM, said:

 

Anything below 60% is considered low-skilled

 

:(

SevernaSnaga #12 Posted 02 September 2018 - 09:41 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 2451 battles
  • 197
  • [BZVZ] BZVZ
  • Member since:
    01-30-2018

Nice to see positive threads.

I had similar experience in few games lately.

I make sure to say "GG WP", to spread a bit of positive energy.

Sometimes even to enemies that outplay me and carry team, they sre often suprised when i tell them that i was from enemy team, but if we all try, maybe we will make better community.

I can be toxic sometimes, but i feel like performing much better when team is co-operative 



NoobySkooby #13 Posted 02 September 2018 - 09:45 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 14205 battles
  • 3,231
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View Postimperiumgraecum, on 02 September 2018 - 11:55 AM, said:

 

Anything below 60% is considered low-skilled

 

By you obviously, but please tell me is that the overall win-rate or whatever it is or the win rate per vehicle?

imperiumgraecum #14 Posted 02 September 2018 - 10:30 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 61551 battles
  • 2,860
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    01-03-2011

View PostBR33K1_PAWAH, on 02 September 2018 - 03:45 PM, said:

 

View PostNoobySkooby, on 02 September 2018 - 10:45 PM, said:

By you obviously, but please tell me is that the overall win-rate or whatever it is or the win rate per vehicle?

 

That wasn't set by me, it was set by the creators of WN6-7-8, namely, wotlabs.

 

And no offense, but a blue player isn't considered high-skilled, especially after I 've seen so many of them fail again and again like total *_insert_insult_of_choice_*
 

I guess it depends on the per vehicle performance; I mean, I do have friends at 55-59% account wr that have superunicum wr and performance in individual tanks, and their low account wr is, primarily, due to slow start.

 


Edited by imperiumgraecum, 02 September 2018 - 10:30 PM.


BR33K1_PAWAH #15 Posted 02 September 2018 - 11:25 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 3597 battles
  • 547
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018

View Postimperiumgraecum, on 03 September 2018 - 12:30 AM, said:

 

 

That wasn't set by me, it was set by the creators of WN6-7-8, namely, wotlabs.

 

And no offense, but a blue player isn't considered high-skilled, especially after I 've seen so many of them fail again and again like total *_insert_insult_of_choice_*
 

I guess it depends on the per vehicle performance; I mean, I do have friends at 55-59% account wr that have superunicum wr and performance in individual tanks, and their low account wr is, primarily, due to slow start.

 

 

The point of my argument is that a guy who's acc i linked to u was e-sports player in WoT - during his long career he played with RedRush, Tornado Rox and HellRaisers. But, according to wn8 devs, he is not "high skilled", lul.

Id say that there is no such stat we have that can be used to determine ones skill at this game.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users