Jump to content


Day 5 billion 2 thousand and 3 , and still I'm waiting for my is3a buff

is3a

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

kaneAAA #1 Posted 04 September 2018 - 10:30 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38953 battles
  • 1,784
  • [SKRAP] SKRAP
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012
So yeah, that much needed buff my is3a needs, yeah, I paid like 30 squid back in the day....so...er....where is it wg?    where is it? Oh, now that you have my money you dont care, ok, cool thats nice...... 

Mimos_A #2 Posted 04 September 2018 - 11:31 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 24562 battles
  • 2,028
  • [QSF-L] QSF-L
  • Member since:
    05-30-2015
At 7.5 cents a game I'd say you already got your money's worth innit?

Balc0ra #3 Posted 04 September 2018 - 11:46 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66541 battles
  • 16,586
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

Considering how few there are on even RU vs other tier 8 prem's that needs a buff. Like the T34 that has 13x more tanks in terms of EU population. I suspect, or rather hope it's not high on their tier 8 prem buff list they talked about earlier when they are done with the preff MM list, vs other that needs it. As there are tanks that have been unbuffed for longer then even the IS-3A has been around. 



PervyPastryPuffer #4 Posted 05 September 2018 - 01:03 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 31180 battles
  • 2,140
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

The IS-3A is perfectly fine. Worse than a regular IS-3 in mobility and gun handling, but with higher DPM. It's not an OP premium, and it should never be.

 

...why do I get the feeling every prem tank that came after it was pay-to-win?



NoobySkooby #5 Posted 05 September 2018 - 01:21 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 14074 battles
  • 3,178
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View PostTankyouverymuch2, on 05 September 2018 - 01:03 AM, said:

The IS-3A is perfectly fine. Worse than a regular IS-3 in mobility and gun handling, but with higher DPM. It's not an OP premium, and it should never be.

 

...why do I get the feeling every prem tank that came after it was pay-to-win?

 

But is it pay to win when you buy your lovely premium tank (and I admit I do love all of mine) yet more often than not you lose?

TsundereWaffle #6 Posted 05 September 2018 - 01:37 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 27233 battles
  • 11,032
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    03-31-2013

View PostTankyouverymuch2, on 05 September 2018 - 02:03 AM, said:

The IS-3A is perfectly fine. Worse than a regular IS-3 in mobility and gun handling, but with higher DPM. It's not an OP premium, and it should never be.

 

...why do I get the feeling every prem tank that came after it was pay-to-win?

 

IS-3A is perfectly fine? No, it’s pretty damn terrible. Saying the IS-3A is fine is like saying the T32 is still relevant.

Xandania #7 Posted 05 September 2018 - 04:47 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36678 battles
  • 1,068
  • [-DGN-] -DGN-
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013

You are older than you seem - given the timescale you used in the title you started waiting 136890527 BCE/10/20

This would mean you are older than the earliest plants - and before first evidence of sexual reproduction.

Something doesn't add up here...







Also tagged with is3a

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users