Jump to content


So a weekend of Mediums.....

good bad very ugly

  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

NoobySkooby #1 Posted 07 September 2018 - 08:31 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 14100 battles
  • 3,193
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

I will vouch for the new cent being good, the SP never been a favourite of mine, Lemming rush makes it look so easy but games never follow what you see in the streams anyway

 

 

But this new Chinese med, T 34S, is it any good, say compared to the Mutz I got rid of?




Well T34S, better then the SP or not, or should it be a case of #walletclosed?
 

Mimos_A #2 Posted 07 September 2018 - 10:02 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 24574 battles
  • 2,028
  • [QSF-L] QSF-L
  • Member since:
    05-30-2015

It depends on how you want your flavour of poop. WIth a big inacurate boomstick, slow but with tons of unreliable armour on the front or with a feeble pewpew gun and decent turret.

 

I'd say the superpershing would be the best tank for you. Too slow to get you into trouble quickly, armour that works well enough as long as you point it towards the enemy and enough gun depression to use most positions.


Edited by Mimos_A, 07 September 2018 - 10:05 AM.


Geno1isme #3 Posted 07 September 2018 - 12:02 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 43193 battles
  • 8,162
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

What new chinese med?

T-34S is a russian T5 med ...



NoobySkooby #4 Posted 07 September 2018 - 01:33 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 14100 battles
  • 3,193
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View PostGeno1isme, on 07 September 2018 - 12:02 PM, said:

What new chinese med?

T-34S is a russian T5 med ...

 

Ah yes my bad, T343 or something, sorry, and yes Tungsten, all you see is my general win rate, or do you ever bother to go and check my abysmal performance in other tanks, some people who understand the numbers say i do well in certain other tanks, me I just play as i see fit, and try to do my best but anyway thank you for your positive input:popcorn:

 

i was nearly tempted but no it is #walletclosed as i did read u  on said tank in the in game vehicles section.



TungstenHitman #5 Posted 07 September 2018 - 02:31 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 23105 battles
  • 4,203
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016

View PostNoobySkooby, on 07 September 2018 - 12:33 PM, said:

 

Ah yes my bad, T343 or something, sorry, and yes Tungsten, all you see is my general win rate, or do you ever bother to go and check my abysmal performance in other tanks, some people who understand the numbers say i do well in certain other tanks, me I just play as i see fit, and try to do my best but anyway thank you for your positive input:popcorn:

 

i was nearly tempted but no it is #walletclosed as i did read u  on said tank in the in game vehicles section.

 

I'm only yanking your chain obviously. I have the T-34S, haven't played it and have no intentions of playing it either since it has nothing I like or look for in a tank plus the crew skill layout doesn't even allow for a full crew transfer from any of my other 4 man crew Soviet meds. I haven't sold it since I have no reason too but that said I happily gift it to you if I could.

Geno1isme #6 Posted 07 September 2018 - 02:32 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 43193 battles
  • 8,162
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

View PostNoobySkooby, on 07 September 2018 - 02:33 PM, said:

Ah yes my bad, T343 or something, sorry,

 

Well, T-34-3 is an ancient tank. So I haven't missed any news.

Mimos_A #7 Posted 07 September 2018 - 02:43 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 24574 battles
  • 2,028
  • [QSF-L] QSF-L
  • Member since:
    05-30-2015

View PostNoobySkooby, on 07 September 2018 - 01:33 PM, said:

 

Ah yes my bad, T343 or something, sorry, and yes Tungsten, all you see is my general win rate, or do you ever bother to go and check my abysmal performance in other tanks, some people who understand the numbers say i do well in certain other tanks, me I just play as i see fit, and try to do my best but anyway thank you for your positive input:popcorn:

 

i was nearly tempted but no it is #walletclosed as i did read u  on said tank in the in game vehicles section.

 

You got me intrigued, so I had a look. It would appear that your concept of "doing well" is fundamentally different from most people's.

arthurwellsley #8 Posted 07 September 2018 - 02:56 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 51954 battles
  • 3,089
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

View PostNoobySkooby, on 07 September 2018 - 07:31 AM, said:

I will vouch for the new cent being good, the SP never been a favourite of mine, Lemming rush makes it look so easy but games never follow what you see in the streams anyway

 

 

But this new Chinese med, T 34S, is it any good, say compared to the Mutz I got rid of?




Well T34S, better then the SP or not, or should it be a case of #walletclosed?
 

 

Now might actually be the moment to purchase the Chinese premium medium tank at tier VIII, the very old T34-3.

The reason I say this, is that on Super Test buffs are being tested for it. If you are a gambling man you might wish to gamble that actually it comes out rather strong.

Of course the Super Test stats may not go live,so it is a gamble.

 

Also of note is that buffs to the SuperPershing are also being tested;

<a href='https://i0.wp.com/wot-news.com/uploads/icons/small/usa-a80_t26_e4_superpershing.png' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'style=https://i0.wp.com/wo...perpershing.png" class="transparent" src="https://i0.wp.com/wot-news.com/uploads/icons/small/usa-a80_t26_e4_superpershing.png" style="background:none repeat scroll 0% 0%;"> T26E4 SuperPershing:

  • Increased penetration value for the AP projectile from 192 to 202 mm ;
  • Reload time reduced from 7.863 seconds to 7.671 seconds ;
  • Increased rate of fire from 7.631 to 7.821 rounds/minute ;
  • Increased damage per minute from 1 831,4 to 1 877.1 ;
  • Changed engine power from 500 to 610 hp ;
  • Improved power-to-weight ratio from 9.89 to 12.07 hp / t .

Additionally:

  • Turret armor has been improved. See pic below. (Before/After):

YuKq4N9VKaQ.jpg

 

Source = https://thearmoredpa...ing/#more-65970


Edited by arthurwellsley, 07 September 2018 - 03:00 PM.


NoobySkooby #9 Posted 07 September 2018 - 06:34 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 14100 battles
  • 3,193
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View Postarthurwellsley, on 07 September 2018 - 02:56 PM, said:

 

Now might actually be the moment to purchase the Chinese premium medium tank at tier VIII, the very old T34-3.

The reason I say this, is that on Super Test buffs are being tested for it. If you are a gambling man you might wish to gamble that actually it comes out rather strong.

Of course the Super Test stats may not go live,so it is a gamble.

 

Also of note is that buffs to the SuperPershing are also being tested;

<a href='https://i0.wp.com/wot-news.com/uploads/icons/small/usa-a80_t26_e4_superpershing.png' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'style=https://i0.wp.com/wo...perpershing.png" class="transparent" src="https://i0.wp.com/wot-news.com/uploads/icons/small/usa-a80_t26_e4_superpershing.png" style="background:none repeat scroll 0% 0%;"> T26E4 SuperPershing:

  • Increased penetration value for the AP projectile from 192 to 202 mm ;
  • Reload time reduced from 7.863 seconds to 7.671 seconds ;
  • Increased rate of fire from 7.631 to 7.821 rounds/minute ;
  • Increased damage per minute from 1 831,4 to 1 877.1 ;
  • Changed engine power from 500 to 610 hp ;
  • Improved power-to-weight ratio from 9.89 to 12.07 hp / t .

Additionally:

  • Turret armor has been improved. See pic below. (Before/After):

YuKq4N9VKaQ.jpg

 

Source = https://thearmoredpa...ing/#more-65970

 

Wow thanks for that, maybe the odd gamble here or there, what could possibly go wrong?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users