Jump to content


super conqueror, make a judgement


  • Please log in to reply
36 replies to this topic

Poll: super conqueror, make a judgement (129 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

which vote you give at super conqueror ?

  1. op (30 votes [23.26%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.26%

  2. very strong (66 votes [51.16%])

    Percentage of vote: 51.16%

  3. average (28 votes [21.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.71%

  4. bad (1 vote [0.78%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.78%

  5. very bad (4 votes [3.10%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.10%

Vote Hide poll

davidexillia #1 Posted 08 September 2018 - 03:32 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 2318 battles
  • 64
  • [LIT17] LIT17
  • Member since:
    03-24-2018

Hello,

For curiosity, what judment the people of the forum give  about this tank ?

 

Thanks.



NUKLEAR_SLUG #2 Posted 08 September 2018 - 03:39 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 28400 battles
  • 2,149
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015
Innocent until proven guilty.

Xandania #3 Posted 08 September 2018 - 03:41 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 35971 battles
  • 1,057
  • [-DGN-] -DGN-
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013
good tank

XxKuzkina_MatxX #4 Posted 08 September 2018 - 03:43 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 48745 battles
  • 1,616
  • [RU18] RU18
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016


PoIestar #5 Posted 08 September 2018 - 03:45 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 31687 battles
  • 4,078
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013
More than decent in numerous ways, I wouldn't claim it to be OP though.

vuque #6 Posted 08 September 2018 - 03:48 PM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 17456 battles
  • 2,594
  • [YOQ] YOQ
  • Member since:
    08-05-2010
I didn't play with it yet but I am thinking about free exp'ing until tier 9 and grind my way to the S.Conqueror. I can share my comments when I have the tank but from the opposing side, it looks good and appealing for me!

Edited by vuque, 08 September 2018 - 03:49 PM.


XxKuzkina_MatxX #7 Posted 08 September 2018 - 04:05 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 48745 battles
  • 1,616
  • [RU18] RU18
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View Postvuque, on 08 September 2018 - 04:48 PM, said:

I didn't play with it yet but I am thinking about free exp'ing until tier 9 and grind my way to the S.Conqueror. I can share my comments when I have the tank but from the opposing side, it looks good and appealing for me!

 

That worked out pretty well with the 60TP right?

 

Same as the OP, free xp up to tier 10, 3 times, with less than 3k battles!



Cuck0osNest #8 Posted 08 September 2018 - 04:53 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 8395 battles
  • 885
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016
Can't vote for "ape-brawl like facerolling"  so i voted for super bad.

Chuwt #9 Posted 08 September 2018 - 05:14 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 24795 battles
  • 62
  • Member since:
    06-14-2012

There need to be something between very strong and average.

It seems to be a good tank, but it is certainly not without its weakness...hull down, it can be a big problem for opponents...but then, so can  many lower tier mediums, for example. Out in the open, flanked etc, it has a huge, flabby hull..ok, its better than the ordinary conq, but its not a brawler by any means.

Historically, it was really more of a TD than an MBT, and the game characteristics reflect this. 

If OP means that it can sometimes beat T10 Russian heavies, then it is OP...by any other measures, no.

 



PervyPastryPuffer #10 Posted 08 September 2018 - 05:32 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 30401 battles
  • 1,583
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

View Postvuque, on 08 September 2018 - 04:48 PM, said:

I didn't play with it yet but I am thinking about free exp'ing until tier 9 and grind my way to the S.Conqueror. I can share my comments when I have the tank but from the opposing side, it looks good and appealing for me!

 

Don't skip the Caernarvon! That thing is a lot of fun too, with the 32-pdr.

Dava_117 #11 Posted 08 September 2018 - 05:37 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18997 battles
  • 3,094
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View Postdavidexillia, on 08 September 2018 - 03:32 PM, said:

Hello,

For curiosity, what judment the people of the forum give  about this tank ?

 

Thanks.

What's you problem with SConqueror? It's the 3rd thread about it you start. :)

Are you wondering if grind it or not? Or do you feel it to be too strong or weack? 



Balc0ra #12 Posted 08 September 2018 - 05:40 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 65764 battles
  • 16,016
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
What... You did not get the responses you wanted on your first topic about this? 

Bordhaw #13 Posted 08 September 2018 - 07:30 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 11271 battles
  • 2,277
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View Postdavidexillia, on 08 September 2018 - 02:32 PM, said:

Hello,

For curiosity, what judment the people of the forum give  about this tank ?

 

Thanks.

 

It's called "Super Conqueror" for a reason lol

NoobySkooby #14 Posted 08 September 2018 - 07:32 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 11978 battles
  • 2,290
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View PostXandania, on 08 September 2018 - 03:41 PM, said:

good tank

 

Only as good as the person playing it
18:34 Added after 1 minute

View PostPervyPastryPuffer, on 08 September 2018 - 05:32 PM, said:

 

Don't skip the Caernarvon! That thing is a lot of fun too, with the 32-pdr.

 

Will the new Caernarveon AX have the 32 pdr on it?

PervyPastryPuffer #15 Posted 08 September 2018 - 08:10 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 30401 battles
  • 1,583
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

View PostNoobySkooby, on 08 September 2018 - 08:32 PM, said:

Will the new Caernarveon AX have the 32 pdr on it?

 

No, 20-pdr, like on the pre-buff Caernarvon. It will be more accurate than the 32-pdr though. Faster reload but lower alpha.

 

I'm curious to see how it'll be like.



fallenkezef #16 Posted 08 September 2018 - 09:14 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10225 battles
  • 1,198
  • [TALLY] TALLY
  • Member since:
    11-04-2012

I like my top tier, British turreted TD.

 

Which is basicly the S-Conq, it's a great hull-down TD. Suffers from a lack of alpha and the peek-a-boo nature of the game means the rof is meaningless in most situations but the S-conq can bounce nicely and use good positions unlike the badger.



SupremeMaster #17 Posted 09 September 2018 - 01:16 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 27307 battles
  • 209
  • [M-O-M] M-O-M
  • Member since:
    06-05-2011
Not op but pretty strong for sure. It has little weakspots with nice maneuverability dpm is very good and gun can do the work. And the ammorak is not a wooden box like the conquer has. I can sometimes pen its ''hat'' but it s a rare thing to occur. I dont want to call it OP because the game has its OP tanks in Russian lines. If we can improve other countrie tech trees as well. It will be no problem for anybody. But when we have those Russian tanks in hand, i guess we should not focus on the S conq.

Metalsniper #18 Posted 09 September 2018 - 02:06 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20037 battles
  • 617
  • [F-K-S] F-K-S
  • Member since:
    03-01-2012
It is not OP I can think of maaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnyyyyy russian tanks that are better

MyArmorIsGolden #19 Posted 09 September 2018 - 03:01 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7130 battles
  • 226
  • Member since:
    09-06-2015
better than t110e5

ZDN #20 Posted 09 September 2018 - 07:58 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 19519 battles
  • 57
  • [LOL-T] LOL-T
  • Member since:
    12-14-2011

OK turret but the hull is zero.    So it is not op, just a normal slow tank.And cupola is a heat magnet.

 

Plus the side of the gun you can pen it.If you hull down you get pen there.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users