Jump to content


What new nation(s) will be coming to WOT?


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

lime_vortep #1 Posted 11 September 2018 - 08:45 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10109 battles
  • 263
  • Member since:
    02-28-2016

In the latest Q&A it was confirmed that in 2019 maybe there will be at least one new nation added to the game. What nation could that be? 

 

My top guesses is that it might be Spain or Switzerland. Maybe Israel? 

 

What do you think? 



cragarion #2 Posted 11 September 2018 - 09:19 AM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 43833 battles
  • 2,553
  • Member since:
    07-10-2010

View Postlime_vortep, on 11 September 2018 - 08:45 AM, said:

In the latest Q&A it was confirmed that in 2019 maybe there will be at least one new nation added to the game. What nation could that be? 

 

My top guesses is that it might be Spain or Switzerland. Maybe Israel? 

 

What do you think? 

 

The state of Israel was not formed until 1948 Wot only covers tanks from 1930s to 1960s so Israel will hardly have enough tanks in 12 years to form a tech-tree, also Israels main tank during most of it's existence has been the Centurion and variants of it.

 

Spain used mainly German tanks then American and French between 1930 and 1960, in fact i think the only tank the Spanish designed and built themselves during the time period allowed is the Verdeja No. 1

 

Switzerland used German tanks during the war then american and french tanks in the time period.

 

 

I still think we should get a British Empire or British Commonwealth Tech-tree, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India and any others, that would get several countries into the game that do not have enough tanks of their own to create a tech-tree.


Edited by cragarion, 12 September 2018 - 03:04 PM.


ortega456 #3 Posted 11 September 2018 - 09:26 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 61713 battles
  • 1,040
  • Member since:
    06-08-2012
I think Liberia, Kongo, Uruguay, Kambodia, Swasiline and Lichtenstein would be the next logical steps.

lime_vortep #4 Posted 11 September 2018 - 09:43 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10109 battles
  • 263
  • Member since:
    02-28-2016

View Postcragarion, on 11 September 2018 - 09:19 AM, said:

 

The state of Israel was not formed until 1948 Wot only covers tanks from 1930s to 1960s so Israel will hardly have enough tanks in 12 years to form a tech-tree, also Israels main tank during most of it's existence has been the Centurion and variants of it.

 

Spain used mainly German tanks then American and French between 1930 and 1960, in fact i think the only tank the Spanish designed and built themselves during the time period allowed is the Verdeja No. 1

 

Switzerland used German tanks during the war then american and french tanks in the time period.

 

 

I still think we should get an British Empire or British Commonwealth Tech-tree, Canada, Australia, Zealand, India and any others, that would get several countries into the game that do not have enough tanks of their own to create a tech-tree.

 

WargminG is now all about made up tanks. It's not like the Polish tech tree or the Italian are filled with real tanks. 

FizzleMcSnizzle #5 Posted 11 September 2018 - 09:45 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 4515 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    05-21-2018
I think if they were to put Israeli tanks into the game, the Araby focus would be unbearable.

BR33K1_PAWAH #6 Posted 11 September 2018 - 09:47 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3296 battles
  • 386
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018
Gypsy tanks FTW!

doriansky1 #7 Posted 11 September 2018 - 09:48 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28582 battles
  • 229
  • [SKIL1] SKIL1
  • Member since:
    12-14-2015

View Postlime_vortep, on 11 September 2018 - 09:43 AM, said:

 

WargminG is now all about made up tanks. It's not like the Polish tech tree or the Italian are filled with real tanks. 

The more content , the better. Add all the possible nations , with made up tanks, don't really care and to be honest I don't think any WoT player would want to experience a real "ammo rack". So all these arguments based on hystorical facts don't really matter. At the same time, the invented Italian tech-tree is very interesting with the new autoreloader mechanic, which was (and still is) a novelty for the game. Cannot say the same thing about the Chinese TD tech-tree, can we ?



cragarion #8 Posted 11 September 2018 - 10:00 AM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 43833 battles
  • 2,553
  • Member since:
    07-10-2010

View Postlime_vortep, on 11 September 2018 - 09:43 AM, said:

 

WargminG is now all about made up tanks. It's not like the Polish tech tree or the Italian are filled with real tanks. 

 

All the tanks in the game made it to at least the design stage of development,

none of the tanks in game are exactly like they would be in real life that's impossible,

I mean just look at the Tiger and Sherman in real life the Tiger had a 12:1 kill ration over the Sherman can you imagine if they put that into the game mechanics,

they have to alter certain aspects of the tanks to make a viable game.

it's the same as every single game out there they have to alter reality or they would never work.



Geno1isme #9 Posted 11 September 2018 - 10:07 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 42070 battles
  • 7,548
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

View Postdoriansky1, on 11 September 2018 - 10:48 AM, said:

The more content , the better.

 

Quite the opposite. The more different tanks you add, the more difficult it becomes to balance the game even somewhat. I'd rather see a lot of tanks removed from the game (both premium and techtree) than getting even more. Won't happen of course as "new tanks" is the only way for WG to expand the game content to keep people invested.

_6i6_ #10 Posted 11 September 2018 - 10:27 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 7201 battles
  • 188
  • [A__K] A__K
  • Member since:
    03-22-2018

View PostGeno1isme, on 11 September 2018 - 11:07 AM, said:

 

Quite the opposite. The more different tanks you add, the more difficult it becomes to balance the game even somewhat. I'd rather see a lot of tanks removed from the game (both premium and techtree) than getting even more. Won't happen of course as "new tanks" is the only way for WG to expand the game content to keep people invested.

 

They could as well implement more game modes to "spread" the vast amount of tanks(for balance purposes), but except frontline i havent heard of anything else in the works

loot_the_supermarket #11 Posted 11 September 2018 - 10:37 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 5410 battles
  • 156
  • Member since:
    01-03-2017
Hungarian or Yugoslavian would be my guesses ... more to keep large sections of the EU player base happy with a line they regard as their own.

Edweird #12 Posted 11 September 2018 - 10:55 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 8645 battles
  • 993
  • Member since:
    08-22-2017

Middle Earth is next then Narnia and finally Finland,

 



Browarszky #13 Posted 11 September 2018 - 11:22 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16096 battles
  • 3,674
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013
Vatican or India?

_6i6_ #14 Posted 11 September 2018 - 11:46 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 7201 battles
  • 188
  • [A__K] A__K
  • Member since:
    03-22-2018

View PostBrowarszky, on 11 September 2018 - 12:22 PM, said:

Vatican or India?

 

gibraltar :hiding:

Edited by _6i6_, 11 September 2018 - 11:47 AM.


Bad_Mojo_incoming #15 Posted 11 September 2018 - 11:49 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19894 battles
  • 211
  • [THIK] THIK
  • Member since:
    03-06-2014

How about Somalia? All WG needs to do is add a couple of tracks to some of the rafts they use to hijack ships, and they have the first 3 tanks already.

And they can copy the rest from the ISIS ramshackle MadMax vehicles.



cragarion #16 Posted 11 September 2018 - 11:55 AM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 43833 battles
  • 2,553
  • Member since:
    07-10-2010

View Post_6i6_, on 11 September 2018 - 11:46 AM, said:

 

gibraltar :hiding:

 

Screw the type 5 and maus just stick tracks on the Gibraltar rock, i can here the kids screaming already about no weakspots and how op it is.

_6i6_ #17 Posted 11 September 2018 - 12:00 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 7201 battles
  • 188
  • [A__K] A__K
  • Member since:
    03-22-2018

btw this is the first time i see a non-Toyota car mounted gun..

thought ISIS had an exclusivity with Toyota :P

 

 

 

 


Edited by _6i6_, 11 September 2018 - 12:02 PM.


lime_vortep #18 Posted 11 September 2018 - 12:02 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10109 battles
  • 263
  • Member since:
    02-28-2016

View Post_6i6_, on 11 September 2018 - 12:00 PM, said:

 

 

My god, that think is impenetrable! And mobile! And look at that gun! I wan't it!

loot_the_supermarket #19 Posted 11 September 2018 - 12:11 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 5410 battles
  • 156
  • Member since:
    01-03-2017

View Post_6i6_, on 11 September 2018 - 12:00 PM, said:

btw this is the first time i see a non-Toyota car mounted gun..

thought ISIS had an exclusivity with Toyota :P

 

 

 

 

 

The things you see on Syrian Autotrader website... think it says one careful lady owner underneath.

Emeraldweed #20 Posted 11 September 2018 - 12:20 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9814 battles
  • 907
  • [-322-] -322-
  • Member since:
    05-14-2012

View Post_6i6_, on 11 September 2018 - 02:00 PM, said:

btw this is the first time i see a non-Toyota car mounted gun..

thought ISIS had an exclusivity with Toyota :P

And most of those were imported from Cyprus, we have a thing about jap cars here :P 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users