Jump to content


Something smells fishy ?!

Personal missions rigging rig-gate

  • Please log in to reply
52 replies to this topic

jabster #41 Posted 12 September 2018 - 04:42 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12555 battles
  • 23,729
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View Postspeedphlux, on 12 September 2018 - 03:28 PM, said:

Well, if we disregard that 1/3 of the matchup was made up from members of one clan, 3 of which were fresh Object 260 owners, with less then 20 battles in the vehicle, could give me an explaination as to why the game unfolded the way it did, other than the obvious TeamSpeak communication and having an insight of the enemies deployment ?

 

The argument that I can’t think of an explanation therefore this one is true, is not a particularly good one.



pihip #42 Posted 12 September 2018 - 06:00 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14197 battles
  • 884
  • Member since:
    01-11-2013

View PostHomer_J, on 12 September 2018 - 11:54 AM, said:

Just because you have no friends you don't need to be jealous of those who do.

 

...oookay?

 

I don't see how having 'friends' (oh wow, I have 100 contacts on an online platform, so cool!!!1one ) relates to my previous post. Perhaps I struck a nerve by calling synch dropping 'disgusting'?
 


Edited by pihip, 12 September 2018 - 06:00 PM.


Homer_J #43 Posted 12 September 2018 - 06:18 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29103 battles
  • 30,587
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postspeedphlux, on 12 September 2018 - 04:28 PM, said:

Well, if we disregard that 1/3 of the matchup was made up from members of one clan, 3 of which were fresh Object 260 owners, with less then 20 battles in the vehicle, could give me an explaination as to why the game unfolded the way it did, other than the obvious TeamSpeak communication and having an insight of the enemies deployment ?

Hmmmm... I have only a few games in the StuG from the personal missions and not many with the T28 HTC, does that mean I only got them both last week?

 

I already gave you an explanation.  They yolo'd expecting their clannies to be there but this time their clannies went the other way.

 

As for support, I could write you the reply you are going to get... but it would be wasting my time a lot like you are wasting yours submitting the ticket.


Edited by Homer_J, 13 September 2018 - 08:45 AM.


wobblybob #44 Posted 12 September 2018 - 09:27 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 66299 battles
  • 692
  • [TNAC] TNAC
  • Member since:
    07-23-2011

Expect it was exactly this kind of ticket that got a number of accounts reset and suspended previously. To get 10 players from one clan into a single game takes some effort. WG do not like this.


 

http://forum.worldoftanks.asia/index.php?/topic/51445-prohibited-exploitation-of-the-personal-mission-system/page__st__60__pid__1265279#entry1265279


 


 



Homer_J #45 Posted 13 September 2018 - 08:44 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29103 battles
  • 30,587
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postwobblybob, on 12 September 2018 - 09:27 PM, said:

Expect it was exactly this kind of ticket that got a number of accounts reset and suspended previously. To get 10 players from one clan into a single game takes some effort. WG do not like this.

 

 

WG do not like mission rigging, there is still no evidence of mission rigging.

 

To quote Sideshow Bob - did they ever give anyone a Nobel prize for "attempted chemistry?"



jabster #46 Posted 13 September 2018 - 08:49 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12555 battles
  • 23,729
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View PostHomer_J, on 13 September 2018 - 07:44 AM, said:

 

WG do not like mission rigging, there is still no evidence of mission rigging.

 

To quote Sideshow Bob - did they ever give anyone a Nobel prize for "attempted chemistry?"

 

Not been bothered to watch the replay but I still don’t quite understand the train of thought based on what has been posted so far. Does the OP expect WG to sanction players based on their in-game behaviour seemed a bit strange.

Homer_J #47 Posted 13 September 2018 - 09:02 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29103 battles
  • 30,587
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postjabster, on 13 September 2018 - 08:49 AM, said:

 

Not been bothered to watch the replay

 

I don't think OP provided us with one.  Unless we are expected to go search for it but since he can't even tell us what mission he thinks they were trying to rig then I don't see any point.  I also don't see how Paris is any worse for mission rigging than any other map.  Even if it's spotting you can park in a bush and get your mates to drive toward you in the open until you see them.

 

Seems to me OP wants to have people punished for no crime at all other than the crime of HAVING FUN.



xtrem3x #48 Posted 13 September 2018 - 09:07 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32571 battles
  • 1,490
  • [EFE-X] EFE-X
  • Member since:
    01-03-2013

View PostHomer_J, on 13 September 2018 - 07:44 AM, said:

 

WG do not like mission rigging, there is still no evidence of mission rigging.

 

To quote Sideshow Bob - did they ever give anyone a Nobel prize for "attempted chemistry?"

 

There is no evidence we can 100% verify.

WG however can look into it further and see if the missions have been done with clan on clan damage etc. They can look into it a lot more than what we can see on a screenshot.

 

Should definitely report it, at least they'll be able to look into it further and take action if they are cheating.

A lot of people are struggling to get the 260 legitimately so they should not be allowed to acquire it by cheating.



Slyspy #49 Posted 13 September 2018 - 09:31 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 14202 battles
  • 16,738
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View Postxtrem3x, on 13 September 2018 - 09:07 AM, said:

 

There is no evidence we can 100% verify.

WG however can look into it further and see if the missions have been done with clan on clan damage etc. They can look into it a lot more than what we can see on a screenshot.

 

 

 

Really? How?



8126Jakobsson #50 Posted 13 September 2018 - 09:54 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 67706 battles
  • 3,515
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostSlyspy, on 13 September 2018 - 09:31 AM, said:

 

Really? How?

 

They use their computer to look at the stored battle data. It's like magic. 

jabster #51 Posted 13 September 2018 - 10:16 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12555 battles
  • 23,729
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View Post8126Jakobsson, on 13 September 2018 - 08:54 AM, said:

 

They use their computer to look at the stored battle data. It's like magic. 

 

Assuming that WG store that in their ‘battle data’, yes.



Captain_Kremen0 #52 Posted 13 September 2018 - 11:04 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37492 battles
  • 1,497
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    06-04-2011

View PostHomer_J, on 12 September 2018 - 07:55 AM, said:

 

Hoodieist.  It's cold out there, they are just keeping their ears warm, poor things.

 

Far from the truth sir; I myself am known to wear a hoodie (8 quid from Primani), I was merely commenting on somebody elses comment.

And whilst it is getting nippy I'm still in shorts all day so maybe they are just a bit nesh.



Homer_J #53 Posted 13 September 2018 - 11:35 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29103 battles
  • 30,587
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postxtrem3x, on 13 September 2018 - 09:07 AM, said:

 

There is no evidence we can 100% verify.

WG however can look into it further and see if the missions have been done with clan on clan damage etc. They can look into it a lot more than what we can see on a screenshot.

 

Should definitely report it, at least they'll be able to look into it further and take action if they are cheating.

A lot of people are struggling to get the 260 legitimately so they should not be allowed to acquire it by cheating.

 

I'm going to start writing down car registrations and sending them to the police because, you know, they might have been speeding or something, maybe kidnapping babies for all I know. :facepalm:






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users