Jump to content


World of Tanks 2019 - Community Development Wishlist

2019 wishlist development

  • Please log in to reply
242 replies to this topic

jabster #41 Posted 24 September 2018 - 01:59 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12649 battles
  • 25,346
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010
Fascinating thread I must say, why not just use the pinned suggestions thread instead unless this is a sop to WG really care?

Edited by jabster, 24 September 2018 - 03:04 PM.


Rupolsky #42 Posted 24 September 2018 - 02:06 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 1730 battles
  • 132
  • [HUZ1] HUZ1
  • Member since:
    12-01-2011

View PostHomer_J, on 24 September 2018 - 01:43 PM, said:

I would also wish to see the already stickied suggestions thread taken into consideration.

 

View Postjabster, on 24 September 2018 - 01:59 PM, said:

Fascinating thread I must say, why not just the pinned suggestions thread instead unless this is a sop to WG really care?

 

The gossip around the forum is that the community team were not aware of the suggestions thread that was pinned by Kandly in 2017.

Agent_327 #43 Posted 24 September 2018 - 02:15 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 18921 battles
  • 462
  • [CAF] CAF
  • Member since:
    09-20-2010

My wishes:

  1. Removal of the template system to allow 5-5-5, 4-5-6 and all kinds of variations of tanks to be met in one battle. Maybe even re-introduce a 3-4-4-4 or similar 3 tiered system to make the wait times to get into battle shorter.
  2. Reduce arty to max 2 per battle and add more nations arty lines.
  3. Add an option to enable cross team chat but leave it disabled as default.
  4. Fix the engine sound of the petro-electrical tanks like Tiger P.
  5. Add weakspots to all the super heavy tanks like the Japanese heavies, the Defender and Chrysler premium tanks.


psychobear #44 Posted 24 September 2018 - 03:10 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 19543 battles
  • 2,043
  • [VTL] VTL
  • Member since:
    06-21-2012

1. Remove artillery from the game.

2. Matchmaker tier spread reduced to +/-1.

3. RNG reduced to +/-10%.

 

Done.



Ph3lan #45 Posted 24 September 2018 - 03:31 PM

    Community Operations Lead WoT EU

  • WG Staff
  • 18792 battles
  • 673
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    11-17-2010

View Postjabster, on 24 September 2018 - 01:59 PM, said:

 

he gossip around the forum is that the community team were not aware of the suggestions thread that was pinned by Kandly in 2017.

 

The suggestion thread has been there for quite some time and we have been using it for our regular reports. However it is pretty old at this point and I think it is in need of a refresh to make it more current. I'll ask the CMs to look into it. I like Falcon's idea since it enables us to get a very current and focused picture of what you guys want to see in the game and instead of sprinkling it in multiple reports it gives me the opportunity to write one only about this. 

 

 



Panzertiger12 #46 Posted 24 September 2018 - 03:40 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 17670 battles
  • 38
  • Member since:
    05-08-2012

The SU 26 went from God to useless in 1 PATCH. Maybe put a better gun on it so it's actually playable?

And maybe add the Sturmtiger as a Tier 8 premium Arty?

Those are my suggestions, if you don't consider these, at least read them.

Thanks



Grand_Moff_Tano #47 Posted 24 September 2018 - 04:23 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1776 battles
  • 10,857
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

Since this is now the Community Wish list (in name) here are my wishes in bullet points:

 

  1. Rebalance in the British Tech tree, including vehicles and guns
    • British guns around mid tier, starting with the 6-Pounder, should have a higher alpha damage in comparison to guns of similar caliber from other nations, with a lower rate of fire from what they have now.
    • Cruiser IV merged with the Cruiser III at Tier 2 (Cruiser III/IV), the Covenanter, Crusader, Cromwell, Comet and Centurion I moved down by 1 tier, and introduction of the Centurion III
    • Matilda reclassified as a Heavy Tank
    • Centurion Mk. III turret and 20-Pounder Type A added to the Black Prince at Tier 7
  2. Additional Hull module in the research tree, similar to Turret module, this can be upgraded to a newer hull, for example the Panzer IV F.2 to the Panzer IV H and Jagdpanzer IV to Jagdpanzer IV/70 (a).
  3. Visual change in suspension, such as VVSS suspension becoming HVSS on Sherman tanks.
  4. Rework of the MM to either allow for +/-1 or higher priority for 10/5 MM during times of high population.
  5. Addition of the Israeli Tech Tree, with the Magach 3 and Merkava 1 as the Tier 10s.
  6. Swedish SPG line ending with the Akv 151
  7. Additional branch for German Tank Destroyers, with the inclusions of the Jagd E-50 and Jagd E-75 leading up to the Jagd E-100, and the JagdMaus after the JagdTiger.
  8. British Light Tank line, including, in order from tier 2 to tier 10, the Vickers 6-ton, Vickers Light Tank Mk. VII Tetrarch, Mk. VIII Harry Hopkins, FV101/107 Scorpion/Scimitar, A46, FV301, Scorpion 90, Vickers 24t and a Vickers 24t based vehicle with the 32-Pounder and special Muzzle break picture below:

 

 

And last but not least, purchasable tier 9 and 10 premium tanks, with the restriction of either having 200 to 500 battles of tanks in those respective tiers, or 2000 to 5000 battles in Tier 8  non-premium tanks.

 

Edit: P.S new British Premium Tier 6 Churchill VII AVRE with the 165mm L9 Demolition gun.


Edited by Grand_Moff_Tano, 24 September 2018 - 05:16 PM.


Vule777 #48 Posted 24 September 2018 - 05:34 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29966 battles
  • 1,573
  • [BZVZ] BZVZ
  • Member since:
    02-28-2017

View PostPh3lan, on 24 September 2018 - 03:31 PM, said:

 

The suggestion thread has been there for quite some time and we have been using it for our regular reports. However it is pretty old at this point and I think it is in need of a refresh to make it more current. I'll ask the CMs to look into it. I like Falcon's idea since it enables us to get a very current and focused picture of what you guys want to see in the game and instead of sprinkling it in multiple reports it gives me the opportunity to write one only about this. 

 

 

 

Finally!

 

If you remember I posted a topic recently and asking that mods choose the most realistic and serious suggestions from old pined topic, but this way is ok too.

 

I will add more suggestions now when I realized that you actually read this.

 

Edit,

 

In that topic i suggested that this new pined topic be locked so that no one can spam, so I suggest once more, pin one locked topic where moderators will move only suggestions, this way we will get another spam, arty-haters, .bedlam topic. I think that moderators would have less work instead of cleaning "non-constructive" posts.


Edited by Vule777, 24 September 2018 - 06:45 PM.


Jafostepah #49 Posted 24 September 2018 - 05:53 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 36104 battles
  • 14
  • [KARMA] KARMA
  • Member since:
    11-13-2015

The best wish for players is play a fair game, not getting farmed by 3 arty bots all the time in battles.

 

Remove artys or limit to 1 per team

 

Arty players are not players.



Grand_Moff_Tano #50 Posted 24 September 2018 - 05:57 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1776 battles
  • 10,857
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostJafostepah, on 24 September 2018 - 04:53 PM, said:

Arty players are not players.

How to contradict yourself in 5 words or less.


Edited by Grand_Moff_Tano, 24 September 2018 - 05:57 PM.


Nazgarth #51 Posted 24 September 2018 - 06:29 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28472 battles
  • 1,223
  • [-TWO-] -TWO-
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011

*edited*


 

Edited by Daxeno, 25 September 2018 - 12:28 PM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to discussing moderation.


Grand_Moff_Tano #52 Posted 24 September 2018 - 07:03 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1776 battles
  • 10,857
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011
*edited*

Edited by Daxeno, 25 September 2018 - 12:29 PM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to being off-topic.


Sl4t #53 Posted 24 September 2018 - 07:34 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 14163 battles
  • 34
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011

- Limit arty to one per team. - Couldn't care less about the resulting waiting times before MM finds a spot. Arty population would eventually decrease and we would all get a more enjoyable game.

 

- Remove/ban XVM stats. - Give us an option to hide our stats in battle somehow.

 

- Limit premium ammo to ~10%. - No need to re-balance a thing, just don't allow the abuse of it.

 

- Drop the MM template system. - 7 years of data and different iterations, why do we still have to put up with such mess WG?

 

- Vanilla session statistics. - I love the mod, but with wot updating every other week..

 

- Clock in garage!! :P



Gionnbharra #54 Posted 24 September 2018 - 08:07 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 18429 battles
  • 6
  • [TFUK] TFUK
  • Member since:
    10-23-2017

match making we need to get rid of 3-5-7 and +1 match making instead of +2 matchmaking if you can get this at tier 3 y not tier 8 and 10

 



OofBerry #55 Posted 24 September 2018 - 08:10 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 19006 battles
  • 94
  • [TFUK3] TFUK3
  • Member since:
    05-27-2015

Premium arties. (WG they will get great sales as people wont have to grind arty lines for personal missions.)

 

Remove 3-5-7 because everyone hates it.

 

Limit arty to 2 or 1 a side - 3 is too much.

 

New arty line. Arty players ran out of lines. This won't negatively affect MM as lets be honest, most games already have the max  arty.

 



Storetuss #56 Posted 24 September 2018 - 10:07 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11040 battles
  • 4
  • [PENAL] PENAL
  • Member since:
    09-27-2016
Please remove +2 mm, please remove stun and nerf the overpowered premium tanks like the defender, e-25 and Type 64. Make less arty per game. Rebalance the power creeped tanks like the tiger II and the panther II. Just remove the derp guns from japanese heavies and nerf the armor. Make t10 light tanks useful and not just fast medium tanks with bad guns and less view range.

killer999death #57 Posted 24 September 2018 - 10:17 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 25208 battles
  • 521
  • [JHS] JHS
  • Member since:
    06-25-2011
All I want is for Wargaming to rework camo/view range statistics and how spotting works because getting shot from 150 meters away over and over by a medium tank while I have 450m view range and not spotting it is [edited]hilarious and game breaking

truoste #58 Posted 24 September 2018 - 10:23 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 41222 battles
  • 1,426
  • Member since:
    08-20-2013

1. Option to play without arties. You can even monetize that and allow only premium account owners to play without them. Can you handle all that money? 

2. 3-5-7 need to go/needs to be revised. Being constant bottom tier is not all that much especially when you have to constantly compensate for top tiers that barely manage to think and breathe at the same time. 

4. Make all ammo cost the same and have some advantages and some drawbacks instead of more expensive being just better. Take a look at WoWs for some inspiration.

5. Re-introduce weakpoints and remove Japanese derps

6. Stop making bobjects and calling them balanced. Sure it may be good for short term profits but that kind of decisions sort of destroy the game play. 

Bonus:  Remove Paris, please (or let arties play 15vs15 games there) 



5everin #59 Posted 25 September 2018 - 02:30 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 79257 battles
  • 1,661
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

Disable the 2 key

Balance tanks within a tier so they are different but equal or at least competative against each other.

Create some decent maps that are not designed around Russian tank game play.

Stop producing abominations like the Bobject purely to make people spend money getting them then a few months later "analyzing the stats" and nerfing them ready for the next abomination.

 

I do guarantee none of these things will happen as WG are well aware of the issues and have done diddly-squat to address them for over 7 years.

 


Edited by 5everin, 25 September 2018 - 02:36 AM.


Vule777 #60 Posted 25 September 2018 - 03:23 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29966 battles
  • 1,573
  • [BZVZ] BZVZ
  • Member since:
    02-28-2017

The biggest request as i mentioned, please give a chance to bad players like me to continue playing. For me is very frustrating and almost impossible to play without premium account and i don't have money to pay premiums all the time.

 

Maybe players here don't see that, and they attack me when i said that you change earns for non premium players, but you know that I'm right. So if you continue with that system, bye. I'm paying premium when i can, but you must understand that there is some people that can't pay you that much. If you want to keep only the ones who can spend 500€ for a month, ok and bye. Average salary in my country is 300€, for 10€ I can live 3 dayys or to pay some bills, so excuse me if i decide to deinstall stupid pc game and go in store and buy groceries instead to pay some nonsense for game.


Edited by Vule777, 25 September 2018 - 03:29 AM.






Also tagged with 2019, wishlist, development

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users