Jump to content


Preferential Matchmaking Vehicles in Update 1.2


  • Please log in to reply
244 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:07 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 26,058
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Find out more information about the changes being made to these special Premium tanks.

The full text of the news item

SharpBlue #2 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:17 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 54468 battles
  • 190
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    09-03-2011

Nice changes, I think...

 

More details about the vague "improved frontal armour?"



jetfirecro #3 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:23 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 25247 battles
  • 29
  • Member since:
    06-19-2014
This look little better

Edited by jetfirecro, 04 October 2018 - 02:24 PM.


Weak_man #4 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:27 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5016 battles
  • 444
  • Member since:
    12-31-2017

Any chance in the future to put in garage menu option to choose maximum numbers of arty between 1 and 5 (1,2,3,4,5) ?

People that don't play arta can choose 1 and people that play most of arty can choose 5 so that mm can get in battle faster ?

This is not off topic, it is also about mm change.

I have t26e4 but i want to change it for t44-100 that have more interesting game play.



adameitas #5 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:36 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 63314 battles
  • 849
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
looks good to me. Maybe t343 still needs rof buff but in general looks nice. Have most of them but didnt play for months or even years now i want to try even jt88:)

Stig_Stigma #6 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:38 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9157 battles
  • 361
  • Member since:
    09-16-2015

I have the FCM 50T.  But I dont like the changes you did to the tank, or whatever changes you might want to do to it in the future. \

 

The thing is, that I will accept only two options. 1 Either put back the old matchmaking for those tanks, which is very improbable you do... or 2 give me and other players the possibility to change these tanks with normal (non preferential) premium tanks of same value.
Since my FCM 50 T costed 40+ euros, I  want you to give  me the possibility to change it with a Progetto or something like that. 

 

Another third possibility I would accept, would be to give the tank armor, but since it is a shitty tank in the current meta, I don't think you will do that. 


Edited by Stig_Stigma, 04 October 2018 - 02:40 PM.


SlyMeerkat #7 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:43 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 16458 battles
  • 2,160
  • [FILO] FILO
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
Seems decent but only time will tell

Kandly #8 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:44 PM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 698 battles
  • 790
  • Member since:
    08-23-2016

View PostSharpBlue, on 04 October 2018 - 01:17 PM, said:

Nice changes, I think...

 

More details about the vague "improved frontal armour?"

 

:) Hey! I asked around to see if there's more info on this.

Igor_BL #9 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:47 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39646 battles
  • 1,354
  • [GX] GX
  • Member since:
    06-10-2015

FCM 50t needs gun handling changes. Not reload buff, or gun depression, or mobility. IT NEEDS GUN HANDLING BUFF.

 

but, as people from WG dont play their own game or understand the core if it, i am not surprised.



Polski11 #10 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:49 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36462 battles
  • 1,308
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    02-01-2012

186 mm penetration is new meta? and i thought new premium tanks have ALL 200+ mm pen, few of them 250+ (TDs) so where is point to have KV5 with 186mm and facing 8 enemy in T9s/T10s which can pen kv5 easily AND those new T8s too... so u will wait till MM match u as TOPtier and then u dont need 186mm pen coz T6s/T7s are not well armored

 

edit: ok, i didnt say anything, i forgot u delete your first idea to take prefer.MM from them


Edited by Polski11, 04 October 2018 - 02:51 PM.


RiidzhA #11 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:50 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10548 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    07-11-2016

View PostKandly, on 04 October 2018 - 02:44 PM, said:

 

:) Hey! I asked around to see if there's more info on this.

 

There was detailed post in https://worldoftanks.eu/ some time ago, but i cant find it now. But there is - https://thearmoredpa...al-matchmaking/ - scroll down and there You can see armor changes.

Edited by RiidzhA, 04 October 2018 - 02:50 PM.


HadurHun #12 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:51 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 67723 battles
  • 630
  • [HADUR] HADUR
  • Member since:
    10-23-2011
All I cared about: "Improve the experience for preferential tanks while keeping the preferential matchmaking parameter and their unique characteristics intact."
Still think you could've added an optional secondary cannon for some tanks to get +2 mm. this way you could platoon with standard t8's

GuliwerReborn #13 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:53 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 26532 battles
  • 72
  • Member since:
    06-30-2015
I wonder why T25 Pilot Number 1 don't have preferential MM? Hull have no armour, turret some but most of VIII can pen it w/o gold, avg mobility for med and gun that cannot snipe (low accuracy and penetration)

HadurHun #14 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:53 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 67723 battles
  • 630
  • [HADUR] HADUR
  • Member since:
    10-23-2011

View Postadameitas, on 04 October 2018 - 01:36 PM, said:

looks good to me. Maybe t343 still needs rof buff but in general looks nice. Have most of them but didnt play for months or even years now i want to try even jt88:)

 

standard t 44 with 122 gun is far worse than the current t 34 3 at rof

Mr_Missclick #15 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:53 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6340 battles
  • 731
  • Member since:
    11-27-2017
Are these changes going to be released in the next update?

RiidzhA #16 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:54 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10548 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    07-11-2016

View PostSharpBlue, on 04 October 2018 - 02:17 PM, said:

Nice changes, I think...

 

More details about the vague "improved frontal armour?"

 

There was detailed post in https://worldoftanks.eu/ some time ago, but i cant find it now. But there is - https://thearmoredpa...al-matchmaking/ - scroll down and there You can see armor changes.

lnfernaI #17 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:54 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 28906 battles
  • 3,659
  • [ALLGE] ALLGE
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

Yes, very nice.

 



Max_Calibre #18 Posted 04 October 2018 - 02:56 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20631 battles
  • 905
  • [T-OG] T-OG
  • Member since:
    02-03-2014

If ~  that 'If' The 3-5-7 template MM does gets "fixed" whereas these Tier 8 PMM Vehicles are NOT middle tier every single battle? and NOT Single Tier 8 battles rest of the time?

but get a on average 50/50 chance of being TOP Tier which is how it SHOULD be ~ then these changes very likely will work out fine

 

If you Can and Do Fix/ Improve the 3-5-7MM Template and correctly? so as it Works for us the Players as well then >>  :) :teethhappy: :mellow: 

 

But, Wargame we know you 

~ YOU have a Bad record of lies and 'forgetting things you say' both here/ and the WOT web Portal, as your proposed 'promises'  so often we never see these so-called improvements

 

We want to trust you here honestly we do ~ now its now ALL up to YOU Wargame 

 


Edited by Max_Calibre, 04 October 2018 - 03:21 PM.


Polski11 #19 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:04 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36462 battles
  • 1,308
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    02-01-2012

View PostGuliwerReborn, on 04 October 2018 - 02:53 PM, said:

I wonder why T25 Pilot Number 1 don't have preferential MM? Hull have no armour, turret some but most of VIII can pen it w/o gold, avg mobility for med and gun that cannot snipe (low accuracy and penetration)

 

ahahah, try to play with T95E2 (181mm pen) and almost same paper as t25 pilot... SMM get many slow tanks (spersh, kv5, is6, jg8.8,...) or tanks with terrible penetration (type59, wz, 112, kv5,...) or paper tanks with average speed

Cobra6 #20 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:05 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16332 battles
  • 15,772
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

Honestly, I think the Jagdtiger 8,8 should get exactly the same mobility as the fully upgraded T9 Jagdtiger and it still wouldn't be good.

 

It's good to see these obsolete tanks finally receiving buffs though, that is very welcome.

 

Cobra 6


Edited by Cobra6, 04 October 2018 - 03:06 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users