Jump to content


Preferential Matchmaking Vehicles in Update 1.2


  • Please log in to reply
246 replies to this topic

fighting_falcon93 #21 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:15 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 32103 battles
  • 4,208
  • Member since:
    02-05-2013

Sounds interesting :great:

 

But I think that if you buff the Jg.Tig.88s penetration to 212, it would be logical to also buff Tiger Is penetration to 212 since they're using the same gun.

 

Also it would be extremely nice with some news about premium ammo/consumables rework aswell :unsure:


Edited by fighting_falcon93, 04 October 2018 - 03:18 PM.


Archaean #22 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:18 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15756 battles
  • 1,304
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    04-25-2015

View PostMax_Calibre, on 04 October 2018 - 02:56 PM, said:

 

 

You remind me of my little brother. He argues very similarly.

 

Oh and when was it mentioned that pref mm tanks should have a 50 % chance of being top tier? Going by your train of thought it would be even more than 50% but either way that was never the case. We don't know how the match making system matches tanks, what variables are being used in the process of matching tanks. For example take tank A and tank B, both are T9 tanks but tank A is a heavy tank and tank B is a light tank. Both tanks play differently and have different amount of impact on the game. Thus one can assume that the match making will take this "variable" into consideration and match accordingly.

But then again it could be like you hinted that if tanks are of same tier that they will be regarded as the same.

 

Whatever the case. Don't blame wargaming because of your betrayed expectations. 



gofastandrush #23 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:22 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 32824 battles
  • 91
  • [F-R-L] F-R-L
  • Member since:
    02-14-2016
If you give 185 pen to type 59 and type 34-3, please give to other mediums with such a pen a préférentiel MM.



antwerp_fighter #24 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:23 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36343 battles
  • 216
  • [SPIKE] SPIKE
  • Member since:
    01-29-2015

Amor buff means nothing under current circumstance...180mm or 200mm make no difference in front of 250mm HEAT...

Check the gun handling buff, that's the point...Dont forget the earning is mostly from the damage.



nerdzapper #25 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:26 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 9469 battles
  • 33
  • [G-OP] G-OP
  • Member since:
    03-25-2018
Well, months will pass until we get the new stats on our PMM tanks...

vuletcko #26 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:30 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 13665 battles
  • 6
  • [DRAM] DRAM
  • Member since:
    02-29-2016

Still BS as far as im concern.

You gave IS-6 and WZ's only 186mm pen and on the other hand you gave unnecessary pen buffs to Super Pershing JagTiger 8.8.

 

 



gunslingerXXX #27 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:31 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 11433 battles
  • 2,275
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014

So you've managed to powercreep my CDC even more, this time with ~ 10 tanks at once. 

THANK YOU WG! 

 

If the MM is the problem, JUST FIX THE FCKNG MM! 

When you take an alternative approach, you just screw other non preferential MM tanks.



SobanRe #28 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:32 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 9447 battles
  • 4
  • Member since:
    04-14-2015

Ok, Jagttiger gets 212mm penetration, all other German Tier 8 TDs have at least 246mm. High dpm doesn't help, if you bounce most of your shots and using a lot of  premium ammo defeats the purpose of a premium tank.

 

Edit: Why removing preferantial matchmaking anyways, WoWP has less players than WoT and manges an one Tier spread why can't WoT?

 

Edit2: Sry, I was thinking they are going to remove the preferantial matchmaking with this update. It was something like this suggested some time ago.


Edited by SobanRe, 04 October 2018 - 04:28 PM.


Myzraelbg #29 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:36 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 43834 battles
  • 52
  • [100ML] 100ML
  • Member since:
    03-23-2013
I have a question... If this penetration for wz-111 is it and for Alpine tiger? The 2 tank is same,just 1 skin is different

SharpBlue #30 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:38 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 56192 battles
  • 200
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    09-03-2011

View PostMyzraelbg, on 04 October 2018 - 02:36 PM, said:

I have a question... If this penetration for wz-111 is it and for Alpine tiger? The 2 tank is same,just 1 skin is different

 

 

"Tanks that have the same base model, such as the WZ-111 and the WZ-111 Alpine Tiger, will get the same improvements."



SMR_FV #31 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:45 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 76683 battles
  • 618
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    05-18-2011
I want a refund if you decide to remove Preferential MM. I paid for a preferential match making tank. 

Edited by SMR_FV, 04 October 2018 - 03:46 PM.


Denton_0451 #32 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:50 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 24792 battles
  • 1,671
  • Member since:
    02-18-2011

View PostSMR_FV, on 04 October 2018 - 03:45 PM, said:

I want a refund if you decide to remove Preferential MM. I paid for a preferential match making tank. 

 

They will KEEP the preferential MM.

_Davidge_ #33 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:51 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 12010 battles
  • 1,968
  • Member since:
    03-20-2015

 

 

 



Aoishi #34 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:54 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20300 battles
  • 491
  • Member since:
    03-19-2016

View PostSharpBlue, on 04 October 2018 - 02:17 PM, said:

Nice changes, I think...

 

More details about the vague "improved frontal armour?"

 

230mm turret on type

Homer_J #35 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:58 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29736 battles
  • 31,482
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostStig_Stigma, on 04 October 2018 - 02:38 PM, said:

I have the FCM 50T.  But I dont like the changes you did to the tank, or whatever changes you might want to do to it in the future. \

 

The thing is, that I will accept only two options. 1 Either put back the old matchmaking for those tanks,

 

You know the matchmaking has not changed and is not planned to change?



Akathis #36 Posted 04 October 2018 - 03:59 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 77154 battles
  • 1,480
  • Member since:
    12-02-2012

View PostHomer_J, on 04 October 2018 - 03:58 PM, said:

 

You know the matchmaking has not changed and is not planned to change?

 

It is planned to change.

fryster_12 #37 Posted 04 October 2018 - 04:01 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 44379 battles
  • 862
  • [U-L] U-L
  • Member since:
    11-19-2012
I don't understand the issue they are having in fixing the MM, its quite simple get rid of the 3-5-7 template. " It’s a complex adjustment and our team will need time to do this without breaking anything." Too late its already broken the game.

Hellraiser0201 #38 Posted 04 October 2018 - 04:05 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24019 battles
  • 261
  • [_AWE_] _AWE_
  • Member since:
    02-21-2013

The IS-6 has received buffs but will not eclipse the IS-3 as the IS-6 only sees up to Tier IX, but the IS-3 must be competitive against Tier X tanks.

 

Sure, sure, t8 to be competitive to t10 :D Nice meme.

 

Funny you are WG.

 

You need developers who are actually playing the game but good at it (above average) who have an idea what it needs to be done.

Or maybe listen to your Community contributors and skilled players, they know better than you what is needed for the game to be better.

 



Homer_J #39 Posted 04 October 2018 - 04:10 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29736 battles
  • 31,482
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostAkathis, on 04 October 2018 - 03:59 PM, said:

 

It is planned to change.

 

No it is not.  They dropped the plans to change it.

 

Learn to read.

 

Quote

Goal: Improve the experience for preferential tanks while keeping the preferential matchmaking parameter and their unique characteristics intact.

 

From...


Edited by Homer_J, 04 October 2018 - 04:12 PM.


thetoughcookie #40 Posted 04 October 2018 - 04:10 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 40445 battles
  • 130
  • Member since:
    05-08-2015
This does not sound so bad when preferential mm stays.




3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users