Jump to content


WG and EA same ?

WG and EA

  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

kaneAAA #1 Posted 04 November 2018 - 07:17 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 42416 battles
  • 1,880
  • [SKRAP] SKRAP
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

OMG is EA the same as WG. You could replace EA with WG and it would perfectly describe WG's mm patent. 

 

 

 

 


Edited by kaneAAA, 04 November 2018 - 11:00 PM.


Dorander #2 Posted 04 November 2018 - 07:22 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21025 battles
  • 6,025
  • Member since:
    05-07-2012
Without even clicking that link I can already simply tell you that certain language is simply used in certain fields so a lot will sound the same.

SiliconSidewinder #3 Posted 04 November 2018 - 07:24 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 29050 battles
  • 7,918
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-16-2012

clicked the link and got to some random streamer talking about his own theories how the mm works...

backround was gameplay footage, so... yeah.

this really belongs into the "my buddy toled me and so it's true" conspiracy corner.



CrniVrag #4 Posted 04 November 2018 - 08:07 PM

    Sergeant

  • Veteran
  • 34279 battles
  • 1,585
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    02-06-2011
TL;DW: 

This is basically another "Random battles are fixed to keep some players WR down" conspiracy thread. 

Laatikkomafia #5 Posted 04 November 2018 - 08:38 PM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 23265 battles
  • 5,091
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010

No, WG and EA aren't the same.

 

WG is pay to win. EA is pay to play.



Balc0ra #6 Posted 04 November 2018 - 09:11 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 72760 battles
  • 20,687
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
Did you not post the exact same video half a year ago asking the same thing. We said EA was worse then. Tho today, EA has the day off as Blizzard is in the spotlight. 

AvengerOrion #7 Posted 04 November 2018 - 09:28 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27635 battles
  • 1,333
  • Member since:
    12-21-2013

View PostkaneAAA, on 04 November 2018 - 07:17 PM, said:

OMG is EA the same as WG. You could replace EA with WG and it would perfectly describe WG's mm patent. 

 

https://www.youtube....6&v=E_QaTtvI2tg

 

 

No, WG is free to play, pay to win.

EA is pay to play, pay again to win.



Balc0ra #8 Posted 04 November 2018 - 09:50 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 72760 battles
  • 20,687
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostAvengerOrion, on 04 November 2018 - 09:28 PM, said:

EA is pay to play, pay again to win.

 

I honestly can't name a single f2p game more toxic and p2w then C&C alliance. Or more silly then Dungeon Keeper mobile. There is a reason why EA dominates most worst f2p lists. And WG needs more then MM to beat EA. 



BravelyRanAway #9 Posted 04 November 2018 - 09:56 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 24333 battles
  • 11,822
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010
This is what happens when you leave school early.

kaneAAA #10 Posted 04 November 2018 - 10:35 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 42416 battles
  • 1,880
  • [SKRAP] SKRAP
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 04 November 2018 - 08:56 PM, said:

This is what happens when you leave school early.

 

what happens

 

21:42 Added after 6 minutes

View PostCrniVrag, on 04 November 2018 - 07:07 PM, said:

TL;DW: 

This is basically another "Random battles are fixed to keep some players WR down" conspiracy thread. 

 

Er no its a : WG and EA have done the same research into fixing games thread. Like as in they have as a FACT (if you need, look dictionary under F...a.c.t)

Derethim #11 Posted 04 November 2018 - 10:46 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 18891 battles
  • 2,101
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

EA will first take your money, then you'll pay again to get a DLC and then you pay to win, but by then EA has dropped it's support for the game and made a new one. Rofl.

 

Wargaming won't take your money first, but you'll be making miserable progress until you pay. Then, you'll want to buy a premium heavy tank, because you don't know how the devs work yet and you'll want to make even more credits. Then they'll screw you over and release a similar heavy tank to your premium tank, but it's better in literally everything, except view range, hence, it's not OP.

Then they will release a new line and to make it appealing, they'll make the top tank better than 80% of all tier X tanks.

After that, they'll release a new premium heavy tank, that's more OP than 70% of tier VIII tanks, but it gets bad matchmaking against tier X so it's not OP.

Skip a few years and the first premium tank you bought is a steaming pile of crap, while they did the same thing for the fourth time in a row and it's always made them great money.

 

So, same? Nope. But similar in greed, incompetence and crappy customer treatment. I have first-hand experience with EA and their forums and it's LITERALLY the EXACT same as these.

People complain all the time about this and that and the only people, who care, are the ones that are having a laugh about it and always use what is the most OP thing right now and shell out their wallets to the company.

No responses from devs, mods, or anyone responsible. False promises about nerfs, false promises, that "they'll never sell this and that again" etc.


Edited by Derethim, 04 November 2018 - 10:50 PM.


CrniVrag #12 Posted 05 November 2018 - 10:22 AM

    Sergeant

  • Veteran
  • 34279 battles
  • 1,585
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    02-06-2011

View PostkaneAAA, on 04 November 2018 - 09:35 PM, said:

 

what happens

 

21:42 Added after 6 minutes

 

Er no its a : WG and EA have done the same research into fixing games thread. Like as in they have as a FACT (if you need, look dictionary under F...a.c.t)

 

Have they now? Do you have any proof for these facts other than a random video of some nobody with a conspiracy on youtube?

fwhaatpiraat #13 Posted 05 November 2018 - 11:01 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 58538 battles
  • 1,765
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013
Are there people around here that bought the halloween package at day 1 for "pride and accomplishment"?

Derethim #14 Posted 05 November 2018 - 11:08 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 18891 battles
  • 2,101
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

View Postfwhaatpiraat, on 05 November 2018 - 11:01 AM, said:

Are there people around here that bought the halloween package at day 1 for "pride and accomplishment"?

 

I'm sure there are, but not for that, but for the bonuses.

Imagine having a month of premium on top of the bonus and some personal credit reserves.



fwhaatpiraat #15 Posted 05 November 2018 - 11:29 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 58538 battles
  • 1,765
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

View PostDerethim, on 05 November 2018 - 11:08 AM, said:

 

I'm sure there are, but not for that, but for the bonuses.

Imagine having a month of premium on top of the bonus and some personal credit reserves.

 

My reaction was related to an EA-staff comment on Reddit last year. EA made the (or some, dunno) playable characters in a Star Wars game extremely hard to unlock, in terms of time investment. They did it this way "to provide players with a sense of pride and accomplishment for unlocking different heroes."

 

However, when you just opened the wallet (after you paid the retail price for the game), you could have the exact same feeling of "pride and accomplishment".This caused quite some backfire and hate to EA. 

 

As long as idiots keep buying EA stuff, EA won't change. Just like people keep buying Defenders, Type 59 lootboxes, black tanks (ppl even bought these lol) and so on.



Ceeb #16 Posted 05 November 2018 - 04:26 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 32567 battles
  • 6,177
  • [BEXF] BEXF
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

If you think EA is the same as WG you are wrong, EA will screw over your dead mother and ask take seconds,

 

WG do it when she still alive.



kaneAAA #17 Posted 05 November 2018 - 06:59 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 42416 battles
  • 1,880
  • [SKRAP] SKRAP
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostCrniVrag, on 05 November 2018 - 09:22 AM, said:

 

Have they now? Do you have any proof for these facts other than a random video of some nobody with a conspiracy on youtube?

 

Yes, WG filed a patent describing adjusting mm according to player performance in order to keep them motivated.... its a FACT, and yes its a FACT EA is researching this adjustable environment, fixing the game conditions to give people who otherwise wouldn't accomplish anything, to accomplish something. No conspiracy, actual documented filed patents and research papers from both WG and EA. 

Edited by kaneAAA, 05 November 2018 - 07:00 PM.


LethalWalou #18 Posted 05 November 2018 - 07:14 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31672 battles
  • 1,177
  • [RSOP] RSOP
  • Member since:
    09-17-2012

View PostkaneAAA, on 05 November 2018 - 05:59 PM, said:

 

Yes, WG filed a patent describing adjusting mm according to player performance in order to keep them motivated.... its a FACT, and yes its a FACT EA is researching this adjustable environment, fixing the game conditions to give people who otherwise wouldn't accomplish anything, to accomplish something. No conspiracy, actual documented filed patents and research papers from both WG and EA. 

 

Did you actually read the patent or just the part that came with the tin foil roll you bought?

 

Where's my spaceships though, the patent mentioned things about spaceships so I demand myself a spaceship version of a Tog II :izmena:



kaneAAA #19 Posted 05 November 2018 - 07:30 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 42416 battles
  • 1,880
  • [SKRAP] SKRAP
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostLethalWalou, on 05 November 2018 - 06:14 PM, said:

 

Did you actually read the patent or just the part that came with the tin foil roll you bought?

 

Where's my spaceships though, the patent mentioned things about spaceships so I demand myself a spaceship version of a Tog II :izmena:

 

Yes the patent adjusts to put people in harder matchups if they do well and easier ones if they do baldy, so yes I did. 

Danger__UXB #20 Posted 05 November 2018 - 07:39 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 9786 battles
  • 2,844
  • Member since:
    03-07-2013

View PostLethalWalou, on 05 November 2018 - 06:14 PM, said

 

Where's my spaceships though, the patent mentioned things about spaceships 

 

WG actually brought out 'Spaceships'  so why would you try to use it to riddicule?????...you really need to do your homework if you want to be credible here..

 

 

 

 

...Also in the gaming industry at the moment there seems to be a move on that would equate to what the OP states...

 

 

 

There is even a worry that Star Citizen is going that way??...Again!! Do your homework you lot if you want to seem credible in this forum as riddicule only works on children..

 

 

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users