Jump to content


Toxic People


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

_SpartanWarrior_ #1 Posted 12 November 2018 - 04:29 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36276 battles
  • 449
  • [BLOJ] BLOJ
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013

I just wonder why are people so toxic on forums.

Whenever i wrote my suggestion,someone gets in topic and says that im a bot or im stupid or something like that.I just wonder WHY



cro001 #2 Posted 12 November 2018 - 04:44 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 32797 battles
  • 2,805
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012
It's easier to call you out than argue with you why you're wrong.

_SpartanWarrior_ #3 Posted 12 November 2018 - 04:48 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36276 battles
  • 449
  • [BLOJ] BLOJ
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013
What in the hell should that mean?

cro001 #4 Posted 12 November 2018 - 04:58 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 32797 battles
  • 2,805
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012

View Post_SpartanWarrior_, on 12 November 2018 - 04:48 PM, said:

What in the hell should that mean?

 

  1. You make bold claim(for example, arty is fair and balanced)
  2. People say - "No it's not dude, we've been over this 100 times before you."
  3. You say - "Ummm, yes it is..."
  4. People check out your stats, 48% WR play4fun division
  5. People say - "Shut up bot."

EDIT: Mentioned scenario is hypothetical.


Edited by cro001, 12 November 2018 - 04:59 PM.


Frostilicus #5 Posted 12 November 2018 - 05:19 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 23551 battles
  • 3,476
  • [-ZNO-] -ZNO-
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011

Just had a quick look at some of the topics started by OP.

 

One of them was titled "WoT is dying" - yeah, that's really going to end well :)

 

Another one was a reasonable post, but the attitude was probably never going to set off a reasoned debate - thread was entitled "WTF Ghost shell"? I'd humbly suggest that taking a less combative stance, and actually engaging in a debate when people put forward reasons that you may see what looks like a ghost shell will get your less toxic responses.

 

Still, fair play to the OP, at least you've seen the cause and effect, perhaps you'll get less toxic responses from now on, I certainly hope so :)



Jigabachi #6 Posted 12 November 2018 - 05:51 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 21,021
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
The tone here can be rather rough sometimes, but that rarely happens without a reason. That said, you have to understand that writing stupid things is toxic, too. And that will attract the same kind of answers. And you wrote quite a lot of stupid things...
It's called cause and effect, a very simple rule.

Laatikkomafia #7 Posted 12 November 2018 - 06:01 PM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 23265 battles
  • 5,091
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010

My two cents.

 

When people here read other players' suggestions, they will take a look at the suggester's win rate to see, if they actually know how the game works. Unlike WG, people who are "above average" in WoT, will take suggestions made by said above average players more seriously.

 

Also, do keep the fact in mind, that if people say you are a bot, bad in WoT, whatever win rate-related, it isn't personal ;)



Homer_J #8 Posted 12 November 2018 - 06:01 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 32425 battles
  • 35,416
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010
I find that a lot of people don't like honesty.  Generally doesn't stop me though.

Dead_in_30_seconds #9 Posted 12 November 2018 - 06:59 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 5163 battles
  • 699
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    11-07-2017
My Momma says, "Toxicity is as toxicity does"

N_Sask_R #10 Posted 13 November 2018 - 05:58 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 15330 battles
  • 144
  • Member since:
    11-04-2018
My winrate isn't good enough yet to have an opinion.  If it ever improves enough I'll say I don't find it to be near as bad as forums from....that other place, I love the people on EU for the most part! (in my country we embrace humour and assume everything is meant in a good way, even politics)

Bomblibu #11 Posted 17 November 2018 - 07:08 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36207 battles
  • 218
  • [BEBJI] BEBJI
  • Member since:
    12-10-2011

View Postcro001, on 12 November 2018 - 05:58 PM, said:

 

  1. You make bold claim(for example, arty is fair and balanced)
  2. People say - "No it's not dude, we've been over this 100 times before you."
  3. You say - "Ummm, yes it is..."
  4. People check out your stats, 48% WR play4fun division
  5. People say - "Shut up bot."

EDIT: Mentioned scenario is hypothetical.

 

Yeah, but it is wrong to say so. Because statistically players with winrate 47% ... 48% is a main player base in our game. So developers would listen to them more than to us.

Where I saw stats?

 


Edited by Bomblibu, 17 November 2018 - 07:09 PM.


_SpartanWarrior_ #12 Posted 18 November 2018 - 12:30 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36276 battles
  • 449
  • [BLOJ] BLOJ
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013
I don't care about winrate.Im not a guy for stats.I play WOT for fun.

Jigabachi #13 Posted 18 November 2018 - 01:11 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 21,021
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View Post_SpartanWarrior_, on 18 November 2018 - 12:30 AM, said:

I play WOT for fun.

If you try to think about that once again, you might come to the conclusion that this is not only a very stupid thing to say, because we ALL play this game for fun (people might just have a different understanding of fun), but also a rather toxic thing to say, because it hides quite the bold implications. In fact, it's actually one of the most stupid things to say and one of those lines that makes people 'sigh' and facepalm since years.

 

In other words - it's exactly what I meant in my previous post.


Edited by Jigabachi, 18 November 2018 - 01:11 AM.


kaneloon #14 Posted 18 November 2018 - 01:43 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 30966 battles
  • 3,662
  • [RHIN0] RHIN0
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011

View PostBomblibu, on 17 November 2018 - 06:08 PM, said:

 

Yeah, but it is wrong to say so. Because statistically players with winrate 47% ... 48% is a main player base in our game. So developers would listen to them more than to us.

Where I saw stats?

 

 

But you can't believe that a 48% player understand the game as a 60% one does. But the 48% is sure he does.

It is called the Dunning Kruger effect :

https://en.m.wikiped...g–Kruger_effect

=>

the cognitive bias of illusory superiority results from an internal illusion in people of low ability and from an external misperception in people of high ability; that is, "the miscalibration of the incompetent stems from an error about the self, whereas the miscalibration of the highly competent stems from an error about others."[



ralesm1989 #15 Posted 18 November 2018 - 02:52 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32621 battles
  • 1,944
  • [DE-VI] DE-VI
  • Member since:
    10-19-2012

View Post_SpartanWarrior_, on 18 November 2018 - 12:30 AM, said:

I don't care about winrate.Im not a guy for stats.I play WOT for fun.

 

This is by far, at same time, the most stupid and the most funny sentence you can hear from players like him. And so much iritating.

 

And rest of us? Are we playing this for gold olympic medal? Please, if your idea is not get ''intoxicated'' even here, do not use this sentence, or any other stupid phrases.



cro001 #16 Posted 18 November 2018 - 06:05 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 32797 battles
  • 2,805
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012

View PostBomblibu, on 17 November 2018 - 07:08 PM, said:

Yeah, but it is wrong to say so. Because statistically players with winrate 47% ... 48% is a main player base in our game. So developers would listen to them more than to us.

Where I saw stats?

 

 

Yeah that's why we have Type 5 and 430U and Defender in game. Because WG is catering to your wishes already. And it has backfired.

 


peti15hunagri #17 Posted 18 November 2018 - 08:33 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5837 battles
  • 17
  • [AVNGR] AVNGR
  • Member since:
    05-08-2015

View Post_SpartanWarrior_, on 12 November 2018 - 04:29 PM, said:

I just wonder why are people so toxic on forums.

Whenever i wrote my suggestion,someone gets in topic and says that im a bot or im stupid or something like that.I just wonder WHY

 

I'm also trying to look for that. But I realized these people had a lot of free time....

Pansenmann #18 Posted 18 November 2018 - 10:54 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36231 battles
  • 13,832
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

View Post_SpartanWarrior_, on 12 November 2018 - 04:29 PM, said:

I just wonder why are people so toxic on forums.

Whenever i wrote my suggestion,someone gets in topic and says that im a bot or im stupid or something like that.I just wonder WHY

 

must be your stats or your suggestions are not very well thought.

 

Spoiler

 



Bomblibu #19 Posted 19 November 2018 - 05:55 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36207 battles
  • 218
  • [BEBJI] BEBJI
  • Member since:
    12-10-2011

View PostBomblibu, on 17 November 2018 - 08:08 PM, said:

 

Yeah, but it is wrong to say so. Because statistically players with winrate 47% ... 48% is a main player base in our game. So developers would listen to them more than to us.

 

 

View Postcro001, on 18 November 2018 - 07:05 PM, said:

 

Yeah that's why we have Type 5 and 430U and Defender in game. Because WG is catering to your wishes already. And it has backfired.

 

Eeeee xe xe xe! I see you are not the one who carefully read posts :ohmy: 



ralesm1989 #20 Posted 21 November 2018 - 07:28 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32621 battles
  • 1,944
  • [DE-VI] DE-VI
  • Member since:
    10-19-2012

View Postcro001, on 18 November 2018 - 06:05 PM, said:

 

Yeah that's why we have Type 5 and 430U and Defender in game. Because WG is catering to your wishes already. And it has backfired.

 

+ for you. And also, i would add, beside Type 5 and Defender, also FV4005 and FV183. But my focus mainly is on first and last two i wrote. 

 

So, that tanks are only here because there will always be so much ******* in this game that cant pen with for example with E3, E4 *because 300+ pen is not enough).... or some other heavy, med, TD tanks, so they need someting that will GIVE THEM PEN WHATEVER THEY HIT. The only condition is for them to hit a tank. At least that. And they make some damage. 

 

But i'm ok with that. Im always for helping endangered and weak species. :trollface:


Edited by ralesm1989, 21 November 2018 - 07:29 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users