Jump to content


Updated Map Pool for Strongholds


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 08 December 2018 - 02:00 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 27,157
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Learn more about the new or removed maps for this competitive mode.

The full text of the news item

_Sensation_ #2 Posted 08 December 2018 - 02:10 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 8278 battles
  • 605
  • [SHEKL] SHEKL
  • Member since:
    01-10-2017
Yay no mountain pass :)

ussvortex #3 Posted 08 December 2018 - 02:14 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 8322 battles
  • 7
  • [U-L] U-L
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

Map pool is incomplete, I've run into Studzanki on the Strongholds map rotation AT TIER 10 yet I see no mention of it here on the TIER 10 updates.

Why is it mentioned at TIER 8 and not TIER 10?



Simona2k #4 Posted 08 December 2018 - 08:33 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 2259 battles
  • 436
  • [GGLT] GGLT
  • Member since:
    10-01-2017
interesting

SlenderMoose #5 Posted 08 December 2018 - 09:42 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 61232 battles
  • 413
  • [ENZYM] ENZYM
  • Member since:
    05-04-2011
I see that you still can camp on Ruinberg on tier X Advance. Please remove!

Rock_n_Rollie #6 Posted 09 December 2018 - 09:33 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13604 battles
  • 685
  • Member since:
    10-11-2017

I would like this opportunity to once more plead my case for more map variation 

cfr put different versions of the same map in the map rotation

 

For example Mountain Pass : you could have at least 4 versions of it :

  1. The "regular" Mountain Pass as we know it
  2. An almost identical version where the bridge has collapsed
  3. A version where the "ice road" is blocked off by a landslide
  4. A version where the southwest "alley" is blocked off by a landslide

 

 

Make sure there is no variant indication during the load screen and it will force player to adapt tactics "on the fly" and detour in stead of the usual lemming train once they find out which version it is.

 

You can do similar things with almost all "corridor" maps, it will lead to more interesting gameplay.  Although, of course the autistic blunicums won't like it ........

 

And one can only hope that one day we'll get dynamic weather...

 



Bordhaw #7 Posted 09 December 2018 - 01:28 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 12736 battles
  • 3,024
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostCommunity, on 08 December 2018 - 01:00 PM, said:

Learn more about the new or removed maps for this competitive mode.
<a href="https://worldoftanks.eu/en/news/general-news/stronghold-map-changes-dec2018/">The full text of the news item</a>

 



Cobra6 #8 Posted 09 December 2018 - 01:37 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16401 battles
  • 16,257
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

Why is Erlenberg removed for Skirmishes? An open map where light tanks can actually work with their vision?

 

Also, Manneheimline and Siegfriedline are good maps, no need to remove them.

 

That being said, to get people to play skirmishes again it's time to remove the (failed) Skill Based Matchmaking that has completely removed the fun from skirmishes for most players that are not complete tomato's. It was a nice experiment while it lasted but it's proven to be bad for participation especially for the higher skilled players.

Currently it's tryhard setups only, no fun allowed.

 

Cobra 6


Edited by Cobra6, 09 December 2018 - 01:39 PM.


eekeeboo #9 Posted 10 December 2018 - 05:51 PM

    English Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 45835 battles
  • 926
  • Member since:
    07-25-2010

Thanks for the feedback. 

 

I can ask the questions, but I don't know when I'll get the answers! 



Zorgane #10 Posted 10 December 2018 - 05:53 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 24430 battles
  • 3,120
  • [FORGE] FORGE
  • Member since:
    11-30-2013

Block Quote

  Learn more about the new or removed maps for this competitive mode.

 

Advances are competitives, not skirmishes.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users