Jump to content


Premium ammo changes.


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

Joakiml66 #1 Posted 01 January 2019 - 10:02 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 21224 battles
  • 7
  • [TST] TST
  • Member since:
    05-30-2015
I would loe achnge in teh premium ammo .. but not how i heard you suggesed .. id say .. ginve permum ammo more dmg but same pen as ordinary shots . then the players must lern how to shoot on tanks .

AliceUnchained #2 Posted 01 January 2019 - 10:03 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 38769 battles
  • 9,083
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011
Post somewhere else, not in the English section.

HundeWurst #3 Posted 01 January 2019 - 10:10 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 71937 battles
  • 4,417
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

View PostAliceUnchained, on 01 January 2019 - 10:03 PM, said:

Post somewhere else, not in the English section.

 

agreed

Jigabachi #4 Posted 01 January 2019 - 10:10 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 19,986
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

Ehm... what about no? There is way too much damage flying around already, no need to add more. It's the additional penetration that makes premammo even kind of needed in the horrible current balance...

No, that would just be a horribly stupid idea.

 

And yes, basic grammar and spellcheck would be nice.



panter22 #5 Posted 01 January 2019 - 10:22 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15177 battles
  • 471
  • Member since:
    05-23-2011

View PostJoakiml66, on 01 January 2019 - 09:02 PM, said:

I would loe achnge in teh premium ammo .. but not how i heard you suggesed .. id say .. ginve permum ammo more dmg but same pen as ordinary shots . then the players must lern how to shoot on tanks .

 



Jigabachi #6 Posted 01 January 2019 - 10:44 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 19,986
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View Postpanter22, on 01 January 2019 - 10:22 PM, said:

[comment about grammar]

Your writing is much worse. Glasshouse and stuff...



panter22 #7 Posted 01 January 2019 - 11:03 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15177 battles
  • 471
  • Member since:
    05-23-2011

View PostJigabachi, on 01 January 2019 - 09:44 PM, said:

Your writing is much worse. Glasshouse and stuff...

 

i love you to princes :girl:

Joggaman #8 Posted 02 January 2019 - 12:37 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 24634 battles
  • 6,634
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-23-2011

View PostJigabachi, on 01 January 2019 - 10:44 PM, said:

Your writing is much worse. Glasshouse and stuff...

 

View Postpanter22, on 01 January 2019 - 11:03 PM, said:

 

i love you to princes :girl:

 

:facepalm:

Balc0ra #9 Posted 02 January 2019 - 12:53 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 68025 battles
  • 17,639
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

Considering some of your most played tanks normal AP pen vs +1 or even equal tier super heavies armor. This will help your E25 and your AT-15A that lacks 70mm pen as is on the "weakspots" of tier 8 HT's like the Defender and the VK 100.01 how? 

 

As vs a 220mm lower plate or cupola at the ideal angle, or close to 250 at a worse impact angle with 171 pen on the AT-15A. All the aiming in the world won't help you damage it then, even with more alpha. As on those, you still need to aim even with the current gold ammo. As their gold pen is not that superior vs other tanks of it's tier. 


Edited by Balc0ra, 02 January 2019 - 12:55 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users