Jump to content


I just can't wait - Panhard / Failhard


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

PabloGee #1 Posted 08 January 2019 - 02:12 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 30324 battles
  • 147
  • [5TAR5] 5TAR5
  • Member since:
    01-15-2014

I can't wait for all those red generals to fail games like this guy spending 5 minutes trying to get to the position. Even more they will platoon at tier X matches doing it.  Like we don't have enough wn 350 IS7 and E100 on top tiers....

 

 

 

This tank must never be introduced to this game at current state . Its a joke and I will play FV to one hit them at the start of the battle.

It's childish machine, useless in hands of below 2500 wn8 players. 

 


Edited by PabloGee, 08 January 2019 - 02:14 AM.


Obi_Wan_Chernobyl #2 Posted 08 January 2019 - 03:49 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 705 battles
  • 12
  • Member since:
    12-23-2018


__SLICK__ #3 Posted 08 January 2019 - 04:30 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5305 battles
  • 293
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    03-04-2017
Looks like fun. I can't wait either. :)

slitth #4 Posted 08 January 2019 - 06:42 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 12531 battles
  • 1,141
  • [AL-EU] AL-EU
  • Member since:
    06-23-2011
Just add a drowning effect or the overturned mechanics to place on the maps that are forbidden and the problem is solved

1ucky #5 Posted 08 January 2019 - 06:55 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 77816 battles
  • 1,133
  • [-RLD-] -RLD-
  • Member since:
    11-05-2013

View PostObi_Wan_Chernobyl, on 08 January 2019 - 03:49 AM, said:

 

Help us, Obi Wan Chernobyl!

Obi_Wan_Chernobyl #6 Posted 08 January 2019 - 07:17 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 705 battles
  • 12
  • Member since:
    12-23-2018

View Post1ucky, on 08 January 2019 - 06:55 AM, said:

 

Help us, Obi Wan Chernobyl!

 

These aren't the bots you're looking for.

Pandabird #7 Posted 08 January 2019 - 08:06 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 34410 battles
  • 4,532
  • [KOFF] KOFF
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013
looks fun tho

wsatnutter #8 Posted 08 January 2019 - 08:13 AM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 25833 battles
  • 8,696
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010
Great gatsby 

Balc0ra #9 Posted 08 January 2019 - 08:16 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 68533 battles
  • 18,060
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
Who cares. It's the most fun I've had in this game in ages driving that thing. And if it will give others the same fun, be they 200 or 2000 WN8. It will help keep the game going. As fun... is rare these days. 

undutchable80 #10 Posted 08 January 2019 - 08:30 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 9287 battles
  • 2,466
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-30-2014

WG did state they would add invisble walls to the maps when the wheeled line gets introduced. Why do you think they gave away so many rentals? First reason was to test out the parameters for possible changes and second reason was to use the data to know exactly where to add the walls. 

 

View PostBalc0ra, on 08 January 2019 - 08:16 AM, said:

Who cares. It's the most fun I've had in this game in ages driving that thing. And if it will give others the same fun, be they 200 or 2000 WN8. It will help keep the game going. As fun... is rare these days. 

+1



Spioszeqq #11 Posted 08 January 2019 - 08:58 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 12720 battles
  • 77
  • Member since:
    06-07-2015
The gameplay of this vechicle looks so surreal it doesnt fit WOT imo. I like heavy tanks fights etc not f1 cars with cannons.

MightyBalls_2 #12 Posted 08 January 2019 - 09:16 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4931 battles
  • 30
  • [MITY] MITY
  • Member since:
    12-25-2014

Edit, not constructive :( 

 

 

 

 

 


Edited by MightyBalls_2, 08 January 2019 - 09:17 AM.


Simeon85 #13 Posted 08 January 2019 - 09:31 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 1101 battles
  • 4,057
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

They have said they are going to introduce invisible walls to block the boost positions, which is probably why they gave out so many test vehicles.

 

Also you do know that some of these boosts are available to current vehicles yeh? I saw a TVP on the one on Mountain Pass the other day, a far stronger and more dangerous tank than the EBR.

 

Plus its likely that the EBR and the wheeled vehicles will get buffs IMO based on the feedback we have seen, and I don't really see how they are any different from normal lights which are just as fragile and die just as easily in the hands of bad players. 

 

The test very clearly showed that aside from the boosts, these vehicles are very far from broken, they are fun and are a new and unique addition to the game. People complaining about them being too fast just sound like bad players to me who can't handle being outplayed by mobile vehicles in the hands of good players. Well tough luck is what I say to them, you are going to get circled to death, you are going to have these things take advantage whilst you reload and look the other way etc. just like happens now with good light tank play that all the heavy tank bobs complain about.

 

It's just a learn to play scenario, typical of most of the whines in this game IMO. 



Homer_J #14 Posted 08 January 2019 - 09:32 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 30437 battles
  • 32,819
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostPabloGee, on 08 January 2019 - 01:12 AM, said:

 

This tank must never be introduced to this game at current state . Its a joke and I will play FV to one hit them at the start of the battle.

It's childish machine, useless in hands of below 2500 wn8 players. 

 

 

You are just jelly you didn't get your hands on a code.

 

Oh, and posting a video with an 18+ rating on a family forum, really?



Element6 #15 Posted 08 January 2019 - 09:36 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 30578 battles
  • 10,894
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013
No lumberjack boosting though, trees refuse to go down up there. Resilient buggers.

Derethim #16 Posted 08 January 2019 - 09:55 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 18480 battles
  • 2,057
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

Could we stop judging other based on wn8? I have really bad wn8, but it's mostly because I used to be goddamn terrible at the game until like 2014.

 

"yOuR wenreet is BeLow 44546532131654661.14 u sUck ermaGHERD"

 

Really slappable. With a chair. In the head.

08:57 Added after 2 minutes

By the way, am I the only one, who think that this map needs to be either bigger, or the mountains need to be accessible to smaller tanks?

Like, you don't want a Super Conqueror up there, but lights and wheels are fine imo



Balc0ra #17 Posted 08 January 2019 - 12:49 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 68533 battles
  • 18,060
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostElement6, on 08 January 2019 - 09:36 AM, said:

No lumberjack boosting though, trees refuse to go down up there. Resilient buggers.

 

I gave up boosting that as the stat side for it has a cap. And I got there ages ago. 

 

View PostSimeon85, on 08 January 2019 - 09:31 AM, said:

They have said they are going to introduce invisible walls to block the boost positions, which is probably why they gave out so many test vehicles.

 

It's just a learn to play scenario, typical of most of the whines in this game IMO. 

 

That was when the new line does arrive. If the premium comes first, I doubt they will do it along that release. Even so I don't see how that changes much for OP if he thinks the tanks have a high skill level. Does it matter if they spend 5 minutes trying to boost and camp on top of a hill near base vs speeding of and die 60 seconds into the game as he has to get to close to the enemy guns to see anything? 



Robbie_T #18 Posted 08 January 2019 - 01:22 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17766 battles
  • 563
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    07-08-2016

I dont like those wheeled trucks either.

It look they can be fun but i dont think they have any place in Wot.

I will be a crapstorm if they release those things and i dont worrie about the good players having it....but there will be 89%pure trash playing those things,

Quess we gonna see a lot less Skorpion G's and Su130 out there 

 

 


Edited by Robbie_T, 08 January 2019 - 01:23 PM.


TheDrownedApe #19 Posted 08 January 2019 - 02:45 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 46137 battles
  • 5,825
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

View PostDerethim, on 08 January 2019 - 08:55 AM, said:

Could we stop judging other based on wn8? I have really bad wn8, but it's mostly because I used to be goddamn terrible at the game until like 2014.

 

"yOuR wenreet is BeLow 44546532131654661.14 u sUck ermaGHERD"

 


 

 

The problem is that the game is based on relying on your 14 teammates to kill the enemy. A certain % of players want to win and have fun, rather than just have fun. These players (of which I'm one) get frustrated by seeing stupid actions taken by your teammates. Unfortunately the only way to judge the likelihood of a player to make a stupid play before they do it is by stats. We then judge every player by that stat rather than hoping they are twice as good as their stats portray.

 

I will reserve judgement on any player on my team until I see dumbass game play that results in my team having a lesser chance of winning, then I will let them know of my frustration (but only if they have enough games to know better)



Jumping_Turtle #20 Posted 08 January 2019 - 02:49 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 64595 battles
  • 5,793
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013

View PostRobbie_T, on 08 January 2019 - 01:22 PM, said:

but there will be 89%pure trash playing those things,

 

 

And how do you think those players perform in the current LT's ?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users