Jump to content


Why Nato went for the 7.62mm over the .280

Shooting

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

Discontinued #1 Posted 10 January 2019 - 02:46 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 2964 battles
  • 534
  • Member since:
    11-02-2015

i was just looking at this,

 

 

Being into rifle & pistol shooting most of my life i was never aware of this,

 

I just realised.. I'm a shooting noob too!

 

 

I never had a chance to fire an SLR/ FN. i always thought they where overated and the ones i saw where of low quality

 

But looking at this example i might have to reconsider my noobness and think about purchasing one when i win the lottery

 

although im sorely tempted by the  Valmet/Sako (Finnish AK) which i was lucky enough to use at a range in Silinjarvi a couple of years ago.Shooting steel plates was a little naughty with a 7.62x39 (such a sweet little round)

 

 

 


Edited by Discontinued, 10 January 2019 - 02:47 PM.


Nishi_Kinuyo #2 Posted 10 January 2019 - 06:24 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 8070 battles
  • 4,918
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

¿.280? :confused:

 

Only NATO rifle round other than the 7.62×51mm I know of is the 5.56×45mm.



SuedKAT #3 Posted 10 January 2019 - 08:01 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 7,029
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014
I spent enough time with the AK-4 and the AK-5 when I did service in the Airforce to ever want to carry around a a big lump of metal again, however taking a couple of rifles or pistols to the shooting range with my dad (who also served, but in the Military) is great fun. Interesting video, I'm not that interested in guns in general, but history and especially WW2 to Cold War history I find very interesting so it was a nice watch :) 





Also tagged with Shooting

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users