Jump to content


CHEATER


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
19 replies to this topic

zegetusa #1 Posted 13 January 2019 - 09:40 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 14924 battles
  • 6
  • [DB_AR] DB_AR
  • Member since:
    02-13-2012

*edited*


Edited by hierrark, 13 January 2019 - 06:19 PM.
comment edited for naming & shaming


SuedKAT #2 Posted 13 January 2019 - 09:46 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 7,052
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014
You do realize that the name you mention in the title is the name of the Youtuber not the one playing right?

Balc0ra #3 Posted 13 January 2019 - 09:46 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 68087 battles
  • 17,677
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

There are several topics about this video already.  And you got the name wrong. Creator of the video is not the one driving the tank. 


Edited by Balc0ra, 13 January 2019 - 09:48 AM.


Sfinski #4 Posted 13 January 2019 - 09:50 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 33092 battles
  • 2,876
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
This again?

UrQuan #5 Posted 13 January 2019 - 09:52 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20629 battles
  • 6,718
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-19-2011

View PostSuedKAT, on 13 January 2019 - 09:46 AM, said:

You do realize that the name you mention in the title is the name of the Youtuber not the one playing right?

 

And this is why naming & shaming is so dangerous. People are bound to go naming & hunting the wrong folks.

Jigabachi #6 Posted 13 January 2019 - 10:16 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 20,009
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Hey! Surprise, surprise! "I quit, fork WG!"-thread author returns to the game two days later.
But he forgot to use cheaters as an excuse for not being a unicum yet...

Erwin_Von_Braun #7 Posted 13 January 2019 - 10:29 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 40014 battles
  • 5,622
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014

View PostUrQuan, on 13 January 2019 - 08:52 AM, said:

 

And this is why naming & shaming is so dangerous. People are bound to go naming & hunting the wrong folks.

 



chiggy #8 Posted 13 January 2019 - 10:59 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32007 battles
  • 1,007
  • [ROTN1] ROTN1
  • Member since:
    07-17-2011
*edited*

Edited by hierrark, 13 January 2019 - 06:24 PM.
comment edited for swearing and insulting


jack_timber #9 Posted 13 January 2019 - 11:06 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 35298 battles
  • 2,413
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014

Is it time to dust off the pitch forks yet....

 

Bit slow this morning see Erwin beat me to it!


Edited by jack_timber, 13 January 2019 - 11:08 AM.


AliceUnchained #10 Posted 13 January 2019 - 11:16 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 38769 battles
  • 9,091
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View Postzegetusa, on 13 January 2019 - 09:40 AM, said:

*edited*

 

*edited*


Edited by hierrark, 13 January 2019 - 06:29 PM.
comment edited as it is non-constructive


CmdRatScabies #11 Posted 13 January 2019 - 12:03 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 37628 battles
  • 4,590
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015

View PostAliceUnchained, on 13 January 2019 - 11:16 AM, said:

*edited*

 

I think this one does show an aimbot and unusually, it's used by a very good player,

AliceUnchained #12 Posted 13 January 2019 - 12:15 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 38769 battles
  • 9,091
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View PostXqual, on 13 January 2019 - 11:22 AM, said:

*edited*

View PostCmdRatScabies, on 13 January 2019 - 12:03 PM, said:

I think this one does show an aimbot and unusually, it's used by a very good player,

 

I am fully aware of that, and this specific replay certainly does show unusual reticle snapping. But the OP makes no distinction, he/she/it just states cheaters use auto-aim. He/she/it also claims that a single replay of a single player is 'prove' that the game is full of cheater. Finally, I sincerely doubt the OP here can actually spot a cheater and is able to tell the difference between in-game auto-aim and MOD assisted.



BKatt #13 Posted 13 January 2019 - 02:22 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34484 battles
  • 533
  • [-LYNX] -LYNX
  • Member since:
    04-28-2013

IMO WG should remove the possibility to use any mods. So everybody can be on even footing with a vanilla installment.



Homer_J #14 Posted 13 January 2019 - 02:53 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 30191 battles
  • 32,332
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostBKatt, on 13 January 2019 - 01:22 PM, said:

IMO WG should remove the possibility to use any mods. So everybody can be on even footing with a vanilla installment.

 

Yes because having a clock displayed in your garage is an unfair advantage!!!!!!:izmena:

 

Really though, if they disable mods then people will just use hacks and cheats instead.



Warzey #15 Posted 13 January 2019 - 03:00 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 57711 battles
  • 981
  • [GOOFY] GOOFY
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View PostBKatt, on 13 January 2019 - 01:22 PM, said:

IMO WG should remove the possibility to use any mods. So everybody can be on even footing with a vanilla installment.

 

You do realize that a lot of UI improvements originate from different mods? For example WG added improved minimap in vanilla client, if you remember old minimap didn't have any markings other than the grid. 



chiggy #16 Posted 13 January 2019 - 03:05 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32007 battles
  • 1,007
  • [ROTN1] ROTN1
  • Member since:
    07-17-2011

View PostWarzey, on 13 January 2019 - 03:00 PM, said:

 

You do realize that a lot of UI improvements originate from different mods? For example WG added improved minimap in vanilla client, if you remember old minimap didn't have any markings other than the grid. 

 

Understood. But wargaming are a multi billion Euro company. The player base deserves MUCH MORE. We give this company money for in house innovation it should not be reliant on mods like it is some indy title with three developers.

AliceUnchained #17 Posted 13 January 2019 - 03:17 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 38769 battles
  • 9,091
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View PostStig_Stigma, on 13 January 2019 - 02:40 PM, said:

*edited*

*edited*

 


Edited by hierrark, 13 January 2019 - 06:41 PM.
comment edited for being insulting and non constructive.


spamhamstar #18 Posted 13 January 2019 - 03:41 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 64313 battles
  • 1,670
  • [LLAY] LLAY
  • Member since:
    12-02-2012

View PostBKatt, on 13 January 2019 - 01:22 PM, said:

IMO WG should remove the possibility to use any mods. So everybody can be on even footing with a vanilla installment.

 

Anything installed client side can be "modded" whether WG allow it or not.  As pointed out by Warzey, a lot of good things in the game were originally mods, such as the over tank markers we all take for granted.

Soup_Potato #19 Posted 13 January 2019 - 04:02 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 282 battles
  • 282
  • Member since:
    09-22-2018
I followed up on this actually, and the guy got kicked from his clan right after this witch hunt started on forums, then he switched his name and went back to the same clan. It's amazing that clans have no backbone today either and will just accept any kind of behavior from their players.

hierrark #20 Posted 13 January 2019 - 06:46 PM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 1348 battles
  • 79
  • [BII] BII
  • Member since:
    07-17-2017

Greetings Tankers.

 

I am locking this thread, as it is violating multiples Rules of the Wargaming Forums.

 

While cheating is forbidden, and strongly punished, so is Naming & shaming, yet alone when it's aimed at the wrong person.

To avoid sanctions please mind the forums rules, and take the time to both read, and fully understand them, thank you.

Rules of the Forum can be checked anytime by clicking HERE

 

General Hierrark

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users