Jump to content


Rigged battles by WG


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
358 replies to this topic

carpius30 #1 Posted 15 January 2019 - 09:20 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 44256 battles
  • 25
  • [_PMC_] _PMC_
  • Member since:
    09-15-2013

What u think about that??

 

Some battles i got 80-90% hit, next battle 20-30, same tank, and when you check other players they also got same percentage 10% +-.

 

Every topic about Rigged battles WG lock, WHY?????



Richthoffen #2 Posted 15 January 2019 - 09:21 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 28377 battles
  • 2,463
  • [MS-] MS-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2011
not rigged, RNG, thats the official title

Edited by Richthoffen, 15 January 2019 - 09:22 PM.


wEight_Tanker #3 Posted 15 January 2019 - 09:23 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9102 battles
  • 720
  • [VI90M] VI90M
  • Member since:
    11-13-2016
Rigged number generator

BravelyRanAway #4 Posted 15 January 2019 - 09:25 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 23220 battles
  • 10,346
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010
It appears to be rigged in your favour....do you want WG to change that?

Nishi_Kinuyo #5 Posted 15 January 2019 - 09:34 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 8121 battles
  • 5,081
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

I've had battles where I've hit with every shot...

And I do mean more than one shot was fired that battle. :trollface:



NUKLEAR_SLUG #6 Posted 15 January 2019 - 09:35 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 31208 battles
  • 3,016
  • [FISHY] FISHY
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015

View Postcarpius30, on 15 January 2019 - 09:20 PM, said:

 

Some battles i got 80-90% hit, next battle 20-30

 

Aim better.

TheDayWeDie #7 Posted 15 January 2019 - 09:36 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18003 battles
  • 367
  • Member since:
    12-28-2014

Rigged? No

 

Absurd RNG concept? Yes

 

Does it make the game experience  nauseous? Yes, of course.



AggressivePotato #8 Posted 15 January 2019 - 09:49 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 30994 battles
  • 23
  • [-UVS-] -UVS-
  • Member since:
    08-22-2013

RNG is RNG,

https://patents.goog.../US8425330B1/en



BravelyRanAway #9 Posted 15 January 2019 - 09:54 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 23220 battles
  • 10,346
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostAggressivePotato, on 15 January 2019 - 08:49 PM, said:

 

Do point out exactly what you want us to look at in that patent....don't be lazy, be exact.

TheDayWeDie #10 Posted 15 January 2019 - 10:10 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18003 battles
  • 367
  • Member since:
    12-28-2014

View PostAggressivePotato, on 15 January 2019 - 10:49 PM, said:

 

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 15 January 2019 - 10:54 PM, said:

 

Do point out exactly what you want us to look at in that patent....don't be lazy, be exact.

 

I guess what he tries to say is that RNG must be taken as it is. Well, in my opinion (an I stated it many times before), what brought us here wont get us there.

 

In other words, RNG is doing more harm than good now, especially in 3/5/7 when the player is almost always at the bottom of the list.

 



DeadLecter #11 Posted 15 January 2019 - 10:11 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26628 battles
  • 1,018
  • Member since:
    05-28-2016
Just RNG. One battle you hit every pixel of any tank you want. Next battles you miss a Type 5 from 20 meters. You can thank RNG for that.

HassenderZerhacker #12 Posted 15 January 2019 - 10:27 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 29000 battles
  • 2,762
  • [1DPG] 1DPG
  • Member since:
    09-09-2015

View Postcarpius30, on 15 January 2019 - 09:20 PM, said:

What u think about that??

 

Some battles i got 80-90% hit, next battle 20-30, same tank, and when you check other players they also got same percentage 10% +-.

 

Every topic about Rigged battles WG lock, WHY?????

 

do you run a premium account or have spent money in WoT in the last 30 days?

Edited by HassenderZerhacker, 15 January 2019 - 10:27 PM.


Balc0ra #13 Posted 15 January 2019 - 11:00 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 68506 battles
  • 18,038
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View Postcarpius30, on 15 January 2019 - 09:20 PM, said:

What u think about that??

 

Some battles i got 80-90% hit, next battle 20-30, same tank, and when you check other players they also got same percentage 10% +-.

 

​So you're saying it's 100% impossible to get more then one miss pr game unless WG riggs it? I see. Do all your guns have 0.1 dispersion at 500m? If you brawl with the 80% one, and play support and fire mostly at targets 400m away with a 0.40 gun and get 30%... It's not gonna be 0.40 on every shot in both games is it? 

 

View Postcarpius30, on 15 January 2019 - 09:20 PM, said:

Every topic about Rigged battles WG lock, WHY?????

 

​Because 90-80% of them go nowhere with the creator of the topic just ranting, raging, making some "edited" appear and then leaves never to look at it again. And 20-30% that do remain open they tend to use less hars words, and most have more common sense in the discussion that follows. So it stays up... Kinda like your hit rate. 

Edited by Balc0ra, 15 January 2019 - 11:02 PM.


AggressivePotato #14 Posted 15 January 2019 - 11:03 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 30994 battles
  • 23
  • [-UVS-] -UVS-
  • Member since:
    08-22-2013

Exactly as pointed by somebody else, i am too drunk and lazy to do so.

RNG is RNG

Some battles you auto aim and pulverize enemy tanks , some matches it's the completly  the other way arround .

You don't hit anything, fully focused shots miss by miles, critical hits, non penetrations.

But , in  the end, nobody talks about the good RNG games, only the bad ones.

 

 

Short story: Deal with it, or stop complaining, 

it's a part of the game we all are familiar with.

 

Edited by AggressivePotato, 15 January 2019 - 11:04 PM.


kaneAAA #15 Posted 15 January 2019 - 11:06 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39733 battles
  • 1,875
  • [SKRAP] SKRAP
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012
its WG idiotic idea that plastering everything with tonnes of randomness is somehow "fun". 

TheDayWeDie #16 Posted 15 January 2019 - 11:08 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18003 battles
  • 367
  • Member since:
    12-28-2014

View PostAggressivePotato, on 16 January 2019 - 12:03 AM, said:

But , in  the end, nobody talks about the good RNG games, only the bad ones.

 

Uhmm..perhaps there are a lot of players who actually don't need "the good RNG". Have you ever thought about it?

Edited by TheDayWeDie, 15 January 2019 - 11:12 PM.


BR33K1_PAWAH #17 Posted 15 January 2019 - 11:15 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 4862 battles
  • 1,062
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018

View PostkaneAAA, on 16 January 2019 - 01:06 AM, said:

its WG idiotic idea that plastering everything with tonnes of randomness is somehow "fun". 

 

But it is :)

OreH75 #18 Posted 15 January 2019 - 11:27 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 50147 battles
  • 2,621
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    05-29-2013

View PostkaneAAA, on 15 January 2019 - 11:06 PM, said:

its WG idiotic idea that plastering everything with tonnes of randomness is somehow "fun". 

 

It kept you busy for almost 40k battles. So unless you enjoy pain and frustration (fine with me) you seem to have fun as well......

Edited by OreH75, 15 January 2019 - 11:27 PM.


Sfinski #19 Posted 16 January 2019 - 06:44 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 33401 battles
  • 2,985
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

View PostAggressivePotato, on 15 January 2019 - 10:49 PM, said:

 

Having a patent doesn't mean it's in use. None of my patents are used.

slitth #20 Posted 16 January 2019 - 07:38 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 12531 battles
  • 1,140
  • [AL-EU] AL-EU
  • Member since:
    06-23-2011

So you think that WG is rigging battles to get a specific outcome?

As easy as this is to claim I never see answers to 2 question

How do they rig the game and why?

 

It's especially the how they do it that interest me.

Because I can for the life of me not see how they could make a program that could do this.

For one how does it account for user incompetence?

I mean I know for a fact that 99,9 of my deaths are do to my own bad decisions.

So I fail to see a program that would help be stay alive longer or do more damage.

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users