Jump to content


Buff the T-22

t-22 buff

  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

The_Chicken_ #1 Posted 16 January 2019 - 02:54 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 41304 battles
  • 10
  • [ANIML] ANIML
  • Member since:
    03-09-2012
For god's sake make the T-22 as it was in the beginning or at least buff the gun somehow. It is so unfair that people struggled so much through the mission to get this tank and at the end WG basically just tells you to go and... yourself.
So what I think happened was some moaning noobies that probably couldn't get the tank and thought it's overpowered, because mostly good players managed to get it and guess what.. if a good player stays against you well it's probably not the T-22 that beats you up.
Now there are weeks even months passing by before you see a T-22 on the battlefield and you don't even care, you had to buff the obj. 907, 260 now you even buff the obj. 279 saying it's "not worthy". Man I really can't get how WG come to these decisions.

Laatikkomafia #2 Posted 16 January 2019 - 02:57 PM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 22519 battles
  • 4,610
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010
Yes, it was obviously balanced when a 61,6% player gets 69,2% win rate in a tier 10 tank.

Edited by Laatikkomafia, 16 January 2019 - 02:58 PM.


Cobra6 #3 Posted 16 January 2019 - 03:08 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16426 battles
  • 16,461
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

View PostThe_Chicken_, on 16 January 2019 - 01:54 PM, said:

For god's sake make the T-22 as overpowered it was in the beginning or at least buff the gun somehow. It is so unfair that people struggled rigged so much through the mission to get this tank and at the end WG basically just tells you to go and... yourself.

 

There, fixed it for you.

 

It's not about noobies and never was, it's about the fact that V-shaped hulls don't work properly in WoT and certainly not on mediums. Compared with the great other stats it had before the nerf made it completely broken.

Also, so many people rigged the missions that it tainted the whole thing.

 

Cobra 6



The_Chicken_ #4 Posted 16 January 2019 - 03:18 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 41304 battles
  • 10
  • [ANIML] ANIML
  • Member since:
    03-09-2012

View PostLaatikkomafia, on 16 January 2019 - 01:57 PM, said:

Yes, it was obviously balanced when a 61,6% player gets 69,2% win rate in a tier 10 tank.

 

View PostCobra6, on 16 January 2019 - 02:08 PM, said:

 

There, fixed it for you.

 

It's not about noobies and never was, it's about the fact that V-shaped hulls don't work properly in WoT and certainly not on mediums. Compared with the great other stats it had before the nerf made it completely broken.

Also, so many people rigged the missions that it tainted the whole thing.

 

Cobra 6

 

Most of the tanks I don't play solo or try to get the 3-marks are like that. You can clearly see that my avg dmg is about 3,4K dmg. It's the same as the most of the tanks that I play now. My e-50m has more, 907 has more ect.. there is nothing to do with the win rate.. it is that the tank is unplayable right now. WG puts OP tanks every day and makes OP tanks even more OP. How do you explain that nobody is playing this tank anymore?

LordMuffin #5 Posted 16 January 2019 - 03:31 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 49210 battles
  • 11,790
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View PostThe_Chicken_, on 16 January 2019 - 03:18 PM, said:

 

 

Most of the tanks I don't play solo or try to get the 3-marks are like that. You can clearly see that my avg dmg is about 3,4K dmg. It's the same as the most of the tanks that I play now. My e-50m has more, 907 has more ect.. there is nothing to do with the win rate.. it is that the tank is unplayable right now. WG puts OP tanks every day and makes OP tanks even more OP. How do you explain that nobody is playing this tank anymore?

I do agree that WG is buffing tanks to OPness, or buffing already OP tanks (Obj 279).

But I don't believe the best direction is to buff even some other tank to OPness aswell. 



Jumping_Turtle #6 Posted 16 January 2019 - 03:33 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 64596 battles
  • 5,820
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013

View PostLordMuffin, on 16 January 2019 - 03:31 PM, said:

 

But I don't believe the best direction is to buff even some other tank to OPness aswell. 

 

This. They should not buff more tanks but nerf some others.

Yaccay #7 Posted 16 January 2019 - 03:41 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 33991 battles
  • 2,112
  • [4TL] 4TL
  • Member since:
    11-21-2012

Most of the T22 were received as a result of rigging and cheating.

IMHO, each and every T22 should be removed.

Have a nice day.

Spoiler

 



Laatikkomafia #8 Posted 16 January 2019 - 03:55 PM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 22519 battles
  • 4,610
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010

View PostThe_Chicken_, on 16 January 2019 - 04:18 PM, said:

 

 

Most of the tanks I don't play solo or try to get the 3-marks are like that. You can clearly see that my avg dmg is about 3,4K dmg. It's the same as the most of the tanks that I play now. My e-50m has more, 907 has more ect.. there is nothing to do with the win rate.. it is that the tank is unplayable right now. WG puts OP tanks every day and makes OP tanks even more OP. How do you explain that nobody is playing this tank anymore?

 

"I don't play solo" is quite obvious. It is also quite obvious how you follow the meta, quite hypocritical to whine about tanks being OP, isn't it?

 

 

You should know that not all matches are won by raw damage output. It is a combination of when the damage is dealt, taking positions, spotting etc. You do something with the T-22 that the E-50M can't.

 

Do you honestly think the solution of power creep is to introduce even more power creep?

 



Cobra6 #9 Posted 16 January 2019 - 03:55 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16426 battles
  • 16,461
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

View PostThe_Chicken_, on 16 January 2019 - 02:18 PM, said:

 

 

Most of the tanks I don't play solo or try to get the 3-marks are like that. You can clearly see that my avg dmg is about 3,4K dmg. It's the same as the most of the tanks that I play now. My e-50m has more, 907 has more ect.. there is nothing to do with the win rate.. it is that the tank is unplayable right now. WG puts OP tanks every day and makes OP tanks even more OP. How do you explain that nobody is playing this tank anymore?

 

Because only a few people have it, generally only skilled players, and they tend to play underperforming vehicles less. In other words, the 85% of the average and below players that would normally fill the rankings with playing it don't own it so it doesn't get played.

 

This tank basically got synonymous with mission rigging and was made to lose it's appeal as a reward as well as being nerfed to stop it from being OP.

 

Cobra 6



The_Chicken_ #10 Posted 16 January 2019 - 03:57 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 41304 battles
  • 10
  • [ANIML] ANIML
  • Member since:
    03-09-2012

View PostYaccay, on 16 January 2019 - 02:41 PM, said:

Most of the T22 were received as a result of rigging and cheating.

IMHO, each and every T22 should be removed.

Have a nice day.

Spoiler

 

 

So you tell me that I lost two months in grinding this tank and it should be removed, because WG fucked up everything with the missions? Sounds fair yeah. It was WGs responsibility to balance and control the missions and the whole gamemod. The players who did it fairly are still f-ed.

signal11th #11 Posted 16 January 2019 - 03:58 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 39462 battles
  • 6,141
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011
90% of people cheated to get the tank in the first place and then when it was released it was so stupidly broken/OP it was always going to get a nerf... so... no that tank deserves to die and be forgotten.

Laatikkomafia #12 Posted 16 January 2019 - 04:00 PM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 22519 battles
  • 4,610
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010

View PostThe_Chicken_, on 16 January 2019 - 04:57 PM, said:

 

So you tell me that I lost two months in grinding this tank and it should be removed, because WG fucked up everything with the missions? Sounds fair yeah. It was WGs responsibility to balance and control the missions and the whole gamemod. The players who did it fairly are still f-ed.

 

No one forced you to grind the tank.

 

WG can remove tanks if they want to, especially as you didn't pay real money for it.



Cobra6 #13 Posted 16 January 2019 - 04:00 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16426 battles
  • 16,461
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

View PostThe_Chicken_, on 16 January 2019 - 02:57 PM, said:

 

So you tell me that I lost two months in grinding this tank and it should be removed, because WG fucked up everything with the missions? Sounds fair yeah. It was WGs responsibility to balance and control the missions and the whole gamemod. The players who did it fairly are still f-ed.

 

You should be used to that by now, pretty much all CW reward tanks we got with the exception of the Obj907 where thoroughly underwhelming compared to their peers for a large portion of time (and some still are).

The rewards for "time playing" in WoT generally are never super duper.

 

Cobra 6



ValkyrionX #14 Posted 16 January 2019 - 04:04 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 48929 battles
  • 1,551
  • [VIVUS] VIVUS
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015

in addition to buff the T22 would be now that it is sold for bonds

 

come on wg, you can do it



DangerMouse #15 Posted 16 January 2019 - 04:05 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 27722 battles
  • 862
  • [FLOG] FLOG
  • Member since:
    10-28-2010

View Postsignal11th, on 16 January 2019 - 02:58 PM, said:

99.999% of people cheated to get the tank in the first place and then when it was released it was so stupidly broken/OP it was always going to get a nerf... so... no that tank deserves to die and be forgotten.

 

Fixed it for you.

 

DM



The_Chicken_ #16 Posted 16 January 2019 - 04:06 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 41304 battles
  • 10
  • [ANIML] ANIML
  • Member since:
    03-09-2012
THE TANK IS TRASH I JUST ASK FOR A LITTLE LOVE FOR IT. The fact that most of you are still butthurt from the crapthat WG mixed up with this tank doesn't mean that it should be dead and forgotten. I would love to play it but it's gun just can't compete with 90% of the T10 nowadays.
Watch Skill he will tell you what it is.
https://www.youtube....h?v=ZAGXHBricdI

Edited by The_Chicken_, 16 January 2019 - 04:12 PM.


ValkyrionX #17 Posted 16 January 2019 - 04:09 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 48929 battles
  • 1,551
  • [VIVUS] VIVUS
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015

sell this tank FOR BONDS like the other removed tier X

 

I WANT IT

 

I missed 10 miserable missions

WAAAAAAAAAA



Verblonde #18 Posted 16 January 2019 - 04:12 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 2522 battles
  • 103
  • [FUNDB] FUNDB
  • Member since:
    02-03-2015
Since a microscopic proportion of T-22 owners didn't get theirs by rigging, it should be left nerfed...

Jumping_Turtle #19 Posted 16 January 2019 - 04:20 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 64596 battles
  • 5,820
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013

View PostVerblonde, on 16 January 2019 - 04:12 PM, said:

Since a microscopic proportion of T-22 owners didn't get theirs by rigging, it should be left nerfed...

 

It should be nerfed even more.

Soup_Potato #20 Posted 16 January 2019 - 04:23 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 282 battles
  • 302
  • Member since:
    09-22-2018

View PostThe_Chicken_, on 16 January 2019 - 03:57 PM, said:

 because WG fucked up everything with the missions?

 

Have we really now reached the state of hate that it's WG's fault that people rigged the missions?  :facepalm:







Also tagged with t-22, buff

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users