Jump to content


Improvements to Personal Missions And Reward Tanks


  • Please log in to reply
104 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 17 January 2019 - 02:07 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 31,820
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Read up on Personal Missions and Reward vehicles changes coming with the Update 1.4.

The full text of the news item

serra11 #2 Posted 17 January 2019 - 02:13 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 9086 battles
  • 68
  • Member since:
    05-26-2013
Why buff 279 tho ?

lkstamenov #3 Posted 17 January 2019 - 02:13 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 40623 battles
  • 324
  • [BG-AF] BG-AF
  • Member since:
    03-20-2013
Chimera must be imressive tank. I am still on Escalibur

SharpBlue #4 Posted 17 January 2019 - 02:15 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 64881 battles
  • 287
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    09-03-2011
The Chimera is a lot of fun, so this will make it all the better.

baranyaitamas1 #5 Posted 17 January 2019 - 02:47 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 13012 battles
  • 27
  • [RA5HA] RA5HA
  • Member since:
    02-18-2014

"Improved the lower plate": Where man there are four tracks 

 

Stupidest change I've ever seen, don't buff 279 I can't even pen it 


Edited by baranyaitamas1, 17 January 2019 - 02:49 PM.


Cobra6 #6 Posted 17 January 2019 - 02:47 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16531 battles
  • 17,636
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

"Winning battle" conditions should be removed completely as for the majority of players that is not up to them but their team. So it has nothing to do with personal missions.

 

Cobra 6



Dark_Aquila #7 Posted 17 January 2019 - 02:48 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 34315 battles
  • 28
  • [IDERP] IDERP
  • Member since:
    09-28-2013

WHY would you buff the Obj 279??? It makes NO SENSE!!

 

Meanwhile T69, Indien Pz, AMX 65 t are "just fine", right?


Edited by Dark_Aquila, 17 January 2019 - 02:51 PM.


Ati1919HUN #8 Posted 17 January 2019 - 02:52 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 13801 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    01-01-2016
The obj 279 buff is the stupidest buff i have ever seen.There are other tanks like tiger 2 etc. that need buff.

Ramshock #9 Posted 17 January 2019 - 03:11 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14882 battles
  • 148
  • [L-G-N] L-G-N
  • Member since:
    12-25-2016

View PostAti1919HUN, on 17 January 2019 - 03:52 PM, said:

The obj 279 buff is the stupidest buff i have ever seen.There are other tanks like tiger 2 etc. that need buff.

 

Tiger II is not Russian so it actually should get nerfed...

Maauru #10 Posted 17 January 2019 - 03:14 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22906 battles
  • 827
  • Member since:
    03-29-2014

How about improving/buffing Chieftain/T95 and  IS-5?

You buffed T10 CW tanks, you are buffing PM reward tanks and 2 above could really use some buff.

They are also reward tanks and with all new premiums this 2 became obsolete (Chieftain was crap even when it was introduced)

 



Hammerhead20 #11 Posted 17 January 2019 - 03:17 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 30114 battles
  • 2,214
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

Today I saw one "Bobject 279" on the enemy team.

 

That guy simple rushed into the middle of the map (it was Glacier).

 

Nobody was able to penetrate that broken thing, even with Premium ammo...

 

Battle was already lost, because pretty much every single teammate was trying to take out that [edited]joke on tracks...

 

Soon, we got flanked. Battle lasted less than 5 minutes, bravo WG, bravo.

 

And now you making this thing even stronger?  What the actual [edited]???

 

Why bother to buff or fix Tiger II, T32 or AMX 65t if we can do that for USSR tanks, right?

 

Also, your Personal Missions 2.0 sucks. How the hell do I have to skip stupid SPG's missions?

 

Maybe it's time remove them? Also remove "bounce x amount of damage" and "capture enemy base" [edited]as well...

 

I have no idea who the hell are those guys who suggested such usless and ridiculous idea to make that "Bobject" even more powerful...

 

Update 1.4 will be pathetic like previous updates. More broken stuff and less fun as usual...

 

 



Ramshock #12 Posted 17 January 2019 - 03:17 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14882 battles
  • 148
  • [L-G-N] L-G-N
  • Member since:
    12-25-2016

View PostMaauru, on 17 January 2019 - 04:14 PM, said:

How about improving/buffing Chieftain/T95 and  IS-5?

You buffed T10 CW tanks, you are buffing PM reward tanks and 2 above could really use some buff.

They are also reward tanks and with all new premiums this 2 became obsolete (Chieftain was crap even when it was introduced)

 

Chieftain is balanced! And IS-5 buff is on the way, probably will get autoreloader same as IS-3A but more alfa :)



Denton_0451 #13 Posted 17 January 2019 - 03:18 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26368 battles
  • 1,842
  • Member since:
    02-18-2011
Why are you buffing the 279? It's fine as it is currently.

Hammerhead20 #14 Posted 17 January 2019 - 03:26 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 30114 battles
  • 2,214
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

So yeah... It basically means I'm not able to complete even the first set of the missions due [edited]SPG's...

 

Looks like, it's time to go back and try to claim the T-55A...

 

These missions are waste of time and complete frustration...


Edited by Hammerhead20, 17 January 2019 - 03:27 PM.


WhaleOylBeefHooked #15 Posted 17 January 2019 - 03:27 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 89101 battles
  • 179
  • [T-S_K] T-S_K
  • Member since:
    06-11-2011

All very simple except the RNG is a joke at the moment, 10% is an outright lie. I'm playing matches where 60% of my shots are bouncing or not penning, not to mention an aimed shot going wild. Also camo is linked with RNG because I'm being spotted by the enemy behind multiple bushes and just recently through rocks and buildings when I am fully in cover. My other complaint also with RNG is that as soon as a team starts to lose, usually around the 8 down mark the RNG, moves in favour of the other team no Glorious Last Stands you normally get raped by the opposing team because non of your last shots penetrate. It's about time the game was reworked completely before other players notice and the player base go down even further.

 



Ciki_el_Tigre #16 Posted 17 January 2019 - 03:27 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 65724 battles
  • 132
  • [WP_OS] WP_OS
  • Member since:
    12-01-2013

View PostSatanchia, on 17 January 2019 - 02:25 PM, said:

I can't belive buff to already OP 279 do you guys have a brain this tank can be pened only with tier X guns with HEAT only lower tiers like tier VIII cant pen him even with premium ammo. Buf armor on already insane tank is braindead i cant belive remove votka from balance department.

 

Very simple - After many days of testing WG developers realized that the 279e is just OP, and they should like to be OOP.


Edited by Ciki_el_Tigre, 17 January 2019 - 03:28 PM.


Flooding #17 Posted 17 January 2019 - 03:28 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24115 battles
  • 33
  • [JORM] JORM
  • Member since:
    02-28-2013

We will all accept this and continue as we always do , remember 430U ? Most OP tank in the game,has more armor than a heavy,a good mobility and big alpha with great reload time, want to compare that to Leopard of same tier or some other tanks,

Want to compare 268 v4 to other TDs,maybe chinese tier X TD or T110e4 ? 

I used to pay for premium account and bought few tanks before and few months ago i stopped just because of these reasons,no sense in researching any other line when you get Russian tanks and definitely will stop playing at all because of this,no competition in this game just Russian stubborn tank going straight forward killing you while you are sitting duck.

Does any of you plays stronghold or advance ? What is majority of tanks you choose for that type of game ? Maybe mostly Russians,wonder why? 

Anyone plays tier VIII team battles,Wonder what you choose ? IS3A, defender ? 

Enough of me and this game,wish you all luck,



LCpl_Jones #18 Posted 17 January 2019 - 03:39 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13281 battles
  • 1,339
  • Member since:
    06-17-2017
super rasha tonks

Head_crusher #19 Posted 17 January 2019 - 03:48 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 22919 battles
  • 88
  • Member since:
    01-03-2013


SlyMeerkat #20 Posted 17 January 2019 - 03:55 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18620 battles
  • 3,240
  • [-RLD-] -RLD-
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
Nice




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users