Jump to content


Obj140>t62a


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

hasnainrakha57 #1 Posted 02 February 2019 - 03:16 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18366 battles
  • 916
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

Why the heck t62a is still in the game? I think it should be removed since wg buffed obj140 turret roof which was a huge difference between these two meds.

Obj140 gives u solid pros Then t62a +1 gun depression and 220mm+ effective hull armor.

Whereas t62a 5depression and only 175mm+ effective hull and the pros for t62a are useless gun handling which are not significantly different from obj140 gun.



XxKuzkina_MatxX #2 Posted 02 February 2019 - 03:25 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 53231 battles
  • 5,313
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016
To be buffed! :B

Hellfoxe #3 Posted 02 February 2019 - 04:04 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23873 battles
  • 692
  • [QSF-C] QSF-C
  • Member since:
    04-05-2011

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 02 February 2019 - 03:16 PM, said:

Why the heck t62a is still in the game? I think it should be removed since wg buffed obj140 turret roof which was a huge difference between these two meds.

Obj140 gives u solid pros Then t62a +1 gun depression and 220mm+ effective hull armor.

Whereas t62a 5depression and only 175mm+ effective hull and the pros for t62a are useless gun handling which are not significantly different from obj140 gun.

 

T-62A need a buff just mount the 115mm gun and it will able to survie tier x battles longer.

Element6 #4 Posted 02 February 2019 - 04:16 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 31687 battles
  • 11,496
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013
Why should it be removed? Just don't play it if you do not like it...

hasnainrakha57 #5 Posted 02 February 2019 - 05:28 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18366 battles
  • 916
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

View PostElement6, on 02 February 2019 - 03:16 PM, said:

Why should it be removed? Just don't play it if you do not like it...

Coz I used my damn discount on 62a without comparing it with object 140 and u don't see t62a these days only bobject 140..and it's just to fool players that u can get 2 tier 10s with t-54 ...

(Haven't bought it yet)


Edited by hasnainrakha57, 02 February 2019 - 05:31 PM.


fighting_falcon93 #6 Posted 02 February 2019 - 05:37 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 32560 battles
  • 4,393
  • Member since:
    02-05-2013

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 02 February 2019 - 05:28 PM, said:

Coz I used my damn discount on 62a without comparing it with object 140

 

So other players should be punished because of your mistake? :mellow:

 

I like my T-62A, it has better accuracy and aim time and it looks much better than the Obj.140. And on top of that WG has said that they will either buff it or make it more unique in the future. So no, they should not remove the T-62A.



wEight_Tanker #7 Posted 02 February 2019 - 05:38 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10739 battles
  • 1,161
  • [VI90M] VI90M
  • Member since:
    11-13-2016

View PostElement6, on 02 February 2019 - 04:16 PM, said:

Why should it be removed? Just don't play it if you do not like it...

 



Element6 #8 Posted 02 February 2019 - 05:40 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 31687 battles
  • 11,496
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 02 February 2019 - 05:28 PM, said:

Coz I used my damn discount on 62a without comparing it with object 140 and u don't see t62a these days only bobject 140..and it's just to fool players that u can get 2 tier 10s with t-54 ...

(Haven't bought it yet)

I don't see why a company should remove one of it's products because customers fail to compare it to other products. It's good practice to either test tanks on the test server, or look up videos on youtube if you are unsure.



LordMuffin #9 Posted 02 February 2019 - 05:49 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 52608 battles
  • 13,329
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View PostElement6, on 02 February 2019 - 04:16 PM, said:

Why should it be removed? Just don't play it if you do not like it...

Because it adds nothing of interest.

 

It is just a downgraded Obj 140.

 

WG have to do something about it, just like they need to do something about Leopard, E 50m, 50B, Kranvagn, Obj 268, IS-4, E5, E4, Grille 15, JgPzE100, E100, FV4005, CAX, AMX 30 B,  other French T10 heavy and some more.

 

All these tanks are more or less just inferior versions of other T10 tanks.


Edited by LordMuffin, 02 February 2019 - 05:52 PM.


XxKuzkina_MatxX #10 Posted 02 February 2019 - 05:54 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 53231 battles
  • 5,313
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 02 February 2019 - 06:28 PM, said:

Coz I used my damn discount on 62a without comparing it with object 140 and u don't see t62a these days only bobject 140..and it's just to fool players that u can get 2 tier 10s with t-54 ...

(Haven't bought it yet)

 

Some day maybe sooner than you expect you'll be grinning because you bought some OP tier 10 with discount. :)

Element6 #11 Posted 02 February 2019 - 06:02 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 31687 battles
  • 11,496
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013

View PostLordMuffin, on 02 February 2019 - 05:49 PM, said:

Because it adds nothing of interest.

 

It is just a downgraded Obj 140.

The first part can be said about anything in the game, depending on who you ask. It's not like these things are in the way of people who don't find them interesting, is it? 

 

View PostwEight_Tanker, on 02 February 2019 - 05:38 PM, said:

 

Do you think that is a good comparison? One is a tank you can choose to play or grind towards if you want to, the other being something attached to your body that hurts you. 

 



ValkyrionX #12 Posted 02 February 2019 - 06:09 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 52495 battles
  • 2,454
  • [RDDT] RDDT
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015

they are two different tank, who compares the obj140 to the t62a has not understood the role of these two mediums.

if you do not like it, do not play it, simple.

 

anyway the t62a has a much better gun in my opinion, a monstrously well armored turret and a turret/hull rotation exceptional.



hasnainrakha57 #13 Posted 02 February 2019 - 09:17 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18366 battles
  • 916
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

View Postfighting_falcon93, on 02 February 2019 - 04:37 PM, said:

 

So other players should be punished because of your mistake? :mellow:

 

I like my T-62A, it has better accuracy and aim time and it looks much better than the Obj.140. And on top of that WG has said that they will either buff it or make it more unique in the future. So no, they should not remove the T-62A.

Well if they did say they will buff or make it unique then Welcome from me!

Where did wg say that?



1ucky #14 Posted 02 February 2019 - 09:20 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 85391 battles
  • 1,244
  • [THRIL] THRIL
  • Member since:
    11-05-2013

#SoftStats

#FutureStatChanges



fighting_falcon93 #15 Posted 02 February 2019 - 09:52 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 32560 battles
  • 4,393
  • Member since:
    02-05-2013

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 02 February 2019 - 09:17 PM, said:

Well if they did say they will buff or make it unique then Welcome from me!

Where did wg say that?

 

It was a while ago, but IIRC they said it during some Q&A, and then I'm not sure if they also mentioned it during WG fest, and then not long ago there was leaked news about a T-62M model.

hasnainrakha57 #16 Posted 02 February 2019 - 10:13 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18366 battles
  • 916
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

View Postfighting_falcon93, on 02 February 2019 - 08:52 PM, said:

 

It was a while ago, but IIRC they said it during some Q&A, and then I'm not sure if they also mentioned it during WG fest, and then not long ago there was leaked news about a T-62M model.

Well thanks  buddy I will put that thing in my collection! Just got angry that grinded the whole line and unlocked useless thing over better thing..


Edited by hasnainrakha57, 02 February 2019 - 10:13 PM.


TankkiPoju #17 Posted 02 February 2019 - 10:21 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 23629 battles
  • 7,238
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011
Some day WG will megabuff T62A, because its Russian.

wEight_Tanker #18 Posted 03 February 2019 - 04:53 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10739 battles
  • 1,161
  • [VI90M] VI90M
  • Member since:
    11-13-2016

View PostElement6, on 02 February 2019 - 06:02 PM, said:

Do you think that is a good comparison? One is a tank you can choose to play or grind towards if you want to, the other being something attached to your body that hurts you. 

 

You'll have to be a non-dinger to understand the joke.



Solstad1069 #19 Posted 03 February 2019 - 04:57 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 44487 battles
  • 3,558
  • Member since:
    06-15-2013
Its russian so it will be buffed and most likely they overdo it in true WG style.

shikaka9 #20 Posted 03 February 2019 - 05:04 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 70582 battles
  • 950
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013
because T-62 is shiet in reality ... so it is shiet in the game




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users