Jump to content


Winning is all that matters


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

jl00306 #1 Posted 08 February 2019 - 12:38 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 25815 battles
  • 19
  • [SAMF] SAMF
  • Member since:
    02-02-2013

Disclaimer: sarcasm, not trolling.

 

I play to win. Playing a game is not about having fun, facing a challenge, being social with my freinds or alike, but all about winning. Therefore I play games at the lowest difficulty setting, theorycraft and get the currently most OP gear, exploit game mechanics, pay-to-win when it's available, and so forth.

 

Thus, in WoT, I currently only play Russian tanks, mostly meds, and shoot only gol... special ammo. I don't have to mind positioning, armor angles, weak spots, ammo types, team tactics or anything, AND I WIN ALMOST ALWAYS :trollface:. Sure, I spend more money than I ought to, but that's better than loosing, right!?

 

One of my team mates asked me the other day why I even play, if I take everything but winning out of the equation... and damn, he's right. So now I pay a professional gamer to play in my stead. This way I win even more often, and have to bother even less - WIN! Meanwhile, my stupid team mate keeps playing his T49, KV2, Leopard 1, Rhm. Borsig, ELC, etc. and as a true moron laughs while losing ...what a loser.



SaintMaddenus #2 Posted 08 February 2019 - 12:40 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36375 battles
  • 1,916
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    03-04-2011
lol   But as i have been informed by one of our board most experienced poster/Guru's its not part of the rules that you have to try to win nor even try to play your best.

Ceeb #3 Posted 08 February 2019 - 12:40 PM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 31700 battles
  • 5,721
  • [BULL] BULL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

View Postjl00306, on 08 February 2019 - 11:38 AM, said:

Disclaimer: sarcasm, not trolling.

 

I play to win. Playing a game is not about having fun, facing a challenge, being social with my freinds or alike, but all about winning. Therefore I play games at the lowest difficulty setting, theorycraft and get the currently most OP gear, exploit game mechanics, pay-to-win when it's available, and so forth.

 

Thus, in WoT, I currently only play Russian tanks, mostly meds, and shoot only gol... special ammo. I don't have to mind positioning, armor angles, weak spots, ammo types, team tactics or anything, AND I WIN ALMOST ALWAYS :trollface:. Sure, I spend more money than I ought to, but that's better than loosing, right!?

 

One of my team mates asked me the other day why I even play, if I take everything but winning out of the equation... and damn, he's right. So now I pay a professional gamer to play in my stead. This way I win even more often, and have to bother even less - WIN! Meanwhile, my stupid team mate keeps playing his T49, KV2, Leopard 1, Rhm. Borsig, ELC, etc. and as a true moron laughs while losing ...what a loser.

 

I think the Russian med bit is spot on :) No point in playing anyother nation.

 

And I bet you havent spent half as much as the BULL clan leader :)



signal11th #4 Posted 08 February 2019 - 12:41 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 39462 battles
  • 6,141
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011
*Edited

Edited by VyNKaSMyN, 08 February 2019 - 05:15 PM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to Naming & Shaming


SaintMaddenus #5 Posted 08 February 2019 - 12:51 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36375 battles
  • 1,916
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    03-04-2011
*Edited

Edited by VyNKaSMyN, 08 February 2019 - 05:15 PM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to Naming & Shaming


SuperOlsson #6 Posted 08 February 2019 - 12:58 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22043 battles
  • 990
  • [E-5OM] E-5OM
  • Member since:
    08-07-2012

View PostCeeb, on 08 February 2019 - 12:40 PM, said:

 

I think the Russian med bit is spot on :) No point in playing anyother nation.

 

And I bet you havent spent half as much as the BULL clan leader :)

Type 5 and super conqueror says hi ;)



Ceeb #7 Posted 08 February 2019 - 12:59 PM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 31700 battles
  • 5,721
  • [BULL] BULL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

View PostSuperOlsson, on 08 February 2019 - 11:58 AM, said:

Type 5 and super conqueror says hi ;)

 

Meds

Balc0ra #8 Posted 08 February 2019 - 01:07 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 68661 battles
  • 18,100
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
 

View Postjl00306, on 08 February 2019 - 12:38 PM, said:

Disclaimer: sarcasm, not trolling.

 

85% of battles in German tanks. 1% in Russians, all prems, all sub 50%. I suspect that's why still stick to the Germans? Because they are so good? Or?

 

 



pecopad #9 Posted 08 February 2019 - 01:18 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 25437 battles
  • 1,225
  • [UGN] UGN
  • Member since:
    09-04-2015

Slap a German flag on the Russian medium  tank, change the crew language to German with a mod, and presto, you are done.

 

If Russian tanks are the best ones, we all play them... what's the problem.. this isn't a game where countries or factions exist to fight each other.

 

Also this problem almost all the times come from players that love German tanks, so I wonder if there is some butt hurting involved on this complains.

 

I love British tanks, and have no problems on playing Russian tanks if the are the best.


Edited by pecopad, 08 February 2019 - 01:20 PM.


NUKLEAR_SLUG #10 Posted 08 February 2019 - 02:12 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 31237 battles
  • 3,048
  • [FISHY] FISHY
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015

View Postjl00306, on 08 February 2019 - 12:38 PM, said:

Thus, in WoT, I currently only play Russian tanks, mostly meds, and shoot only gol... special ammo. I don't have to mind positioning, armor angles, weak spots, ammo types, team tactics or anything, AND I WIN ALMOST ALWAYS :trollface:. Sure, I spend more money than I ought to, but that's better than loosing, right!?

 

You have a 51% winrate. It would appear you have a slightly more relaxed definition of 'winning' than the average player.

Xandania #11 Posted 08 February 2019 - 02:20 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39506 battles
  • 1,235
  • [-DGN-] -DGN-
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013

View Postsignal11th, on 08 February 2019 - 11:41 AM, said:

err ok.. qpranger you are needed here.

 



qpranger #12 Posted 08 February 2019 - 02:24 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 34837 battles
  • 5,514
  • [HAMMY] HAMMY
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
I play to stun.

NoobySkooby #13 Posted 08 February 2019 - 02:25 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 15779 battles
  • 4,221
  • [DENK] DENK
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View PostSaintMaddenus, on 08 February 2019 - 12:40 PM, said:

lol   But as i have been informed by one of our board most experienced poster/Guru's its not part of the rules that you have to try to win nor even try to play your best.

 

Very true, in fact any LT is fun go cart, too fast to auto aim, too puny to do anything, just a fun 5 minutes if you last that long, I leave the winning to others.

wsatnutter #14 Posted 08 February 2019 - 02:25 PM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 25844 battles
  • 8,726
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010

so you admit on open forum that you account share not sure if your a troll however I have a sneaky feeling that this is coming or maybe this or maybe both ?

 

 

Posted Image

 

 

Posted Image

 

 



MrClark56 #15 Posted 08 February 2019 - 06:27 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 6459 battles
  • 2,455
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-17-2013

Is paying a pro gamer to play your account to win more is a new way to p2w??? Amazing that wg didnt come up with that one to make millions out of it.. dude.. patent the idea and sell it to WG!!! 

For realz...



kubawt112 #16 Posted 08 February 2019 - 07:30 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3378 battles
  • 406
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

Well, there are definitely those who feel better after, say, paying someone to three-mark a T10 CW tank. I've seen a few, and they're hilariously obvious.

 

Interestingly, one of the more common forms of, cough-cough, manlihood improvement is the type with no real effect when the members are at attention. Not unlike those in WoT that use paid services or sealclubbing to pad their stats. I don't really care what either do, but it seems strange to improve something that doesn't matter at all for those actually interested in it.

 

View PostMrClark56, on 08 February 2019 - 06:27 PM, said:

Is paying a pro gamer to play your account to win more is a new way to p2w??? Amazing that wg didnt come up with that one to make millions out of it.. dude.. patent the idea and sell it to WG!!! 

For realz...

 

They might have realized the potential already. I can recall a particular staff member whose winrate is slightly above average just because someone had, very obviously, padded the account to not reflect the actual winrate - which was really terrible. :P



Yaccay #17 Posted 09 February 2019 - 08:31 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 33989 battles
  • 2,112
  • [4TL] 4TL
  • Member since:
    11-21-2012
Fun is all that matters.  :girl:

kaneloon #18 Posted 09 February 2019 - 08:32 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29492 battles
  • 2,429
  • [FR2DB] FR2DB
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011
I have a 43% WR in obj-140, and 58% in all my german heavies ... so according to OP it shouldn't be possible ...

PowJay #19 Posted 09 February 2019 - 08:53 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 37102 battles
  • 4,478
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012
I just read that again. My brain hurts! :facepalm:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users