Jump to content


Whats happening with randoms

game corruption disbalance

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
23 replies to this topic

Cuck0osNest #1 Posted 11 February 2019 - 01:44 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13086 battles
  • 1,082
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016

 

Playing for a maximum skill and performing, viewrange is 420 for sake of reload-aiming , WG learned how to nerf skill, so even RR cant count it, you must just pay for a controlled  flood of disbalance into randoms .

Playing on WZ8 and some comparison with other players.

# NickName (EU) RR Battles Avg_xp WinRate AVF Awards Skill 1 (kamikaze) Skill 2 (spotting) Skill 3 (fairplay) Skill 4 (participation) Skill 5 (oskorei)
1 magictireur 17.5661 29 1041.2414 65.5200 12.1821 0 0.1861 1.3160 1.8959 0.6057 4.5922
2 MrPorsche 13.1468 89 601.3483 56.1800 5.9385 0 0.0260 1.0173 2.5376 0.5504 6.6319
3 szaja118 10.3826 51 588.9804 56.8600 6.1009 0 0.0377 1.2053 3.0696 0.4677 3.7763
4 Cuck0osNest 3.7094 133 549.9023 51.1300 1.1342 0 0.0030 1.7644 4.8129 0.6239 1.9483

Edited by Cuck0osNest, 11 February 2019 - 01:52 AM.


kaneloon #2 Posted 11 February 2019 - 02:45 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 30946 battles
  • 3,638
  • [RHIN0] RHIN0
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011
Some days are worse than others. Solo rush can't counter that ?

NUKLEAR_SLUG #3 Posted 11 February 2019 - 03:02 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 34076 battles
  • 4,395
  • [FISHY] FISHY
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015
Yep, something is definitely wrong when you can't rig your own skill metric to put yourself number one. :D

Cuck0osNest #4 Posted 11 February 2019 - 04:54 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13086 battles
  • 1,082
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016
Nothing is wrong with buying stats. I  am still top1 at skill in this game by any skill dependant rating in overall.

Edited by Cuck0osNest, 11 February 2019 - 04:58 AM.


Sfinski #5 Posted 11 February 2019 - 06:52 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 36470 battles
  • 3,428
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
Shouldn't you win more than anybody else if you were the best?

BR33K1_PAWAH #6 Posted 11 February 2019 - 08:24 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 6467 battles
  • 1,413
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018

View PostSfinski, on 11 February 2019 - 08:52 AM, said:

Shouldn't you win more than anybody else if you were the best?

 

No, bcs he doesn't buy stats from WG like everyone else do.

OreH75 #7 Posted 11 February 2019 - 08:26 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 52814 battles
  • 2,864
  • [-NARF] -NARF
  • Member since:
    05-29-2013
Sleipnir move all the way!

unhappy_bunny #8 Posted 11 February 2019 - 10:39 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 19784 battles
  • 3,516
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

Thats a new way of describing "rigging". WG have found a way to nerf skill. 

They dont just nerf tanks/dpm/accuracy/view range, or manipulate rng and mm in order to rig a battle, they now nerf an individual players skill.

 

My investment in tin-foil makers is going to pay dividends. 



Tom_Deekanarry #9 Posted 11 February 2019 - 10:45 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12951 battles
  • 520
  • Member since:
    06-28-2012

So is he saying he's not no1 on the list only because the game is rigged against his skill?

 

Anyone want to explain how that could work, I'm a bit stumped?

Not to mention once I understand how it works it's a great excuse for my lack of ability which I intend to trot out every time I screw up!



FluffyRedFox #10 Posted 11 February 2019 - 10:47 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 25286 battles
  • 9,138
  • [FLOOF] FLOOF
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012
Yes yes, but of course.

malachi6 #11 Posted 11 February 2019 - 10:49 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 50920 battles
  • 4,249
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

Is this argument basically one of "I am the best why do my stats not reflect it"?  Dunning and Kruger were definitely on to something.

 

I am not very good because of a slew of reasons.  The main one being, I am not very good.


Edited by malachi6, 11 February 2019 - 10:50 AM.


BKatt #12 Posted 11 February 2019 - 10:51 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 36848 battles
  • 590
  • Member since:
    04-28-2013

Thats one super special snowflake.

Guy makes his own "skill system" only to claim nr.1 in his own mind.

 

Alas, its ALWAYS everyone elses fault. :girl:



Cuck0osNest #13 Posted 11 February 2019 - 07:15 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13086 battles
  • 1,082
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016
Learn to play and maybe you will be good in developer's pay to win system.

Edited by Cuck0osNest, 11 February 2019 - 07:17 PM.


SuedKAT #14 Posted 11 February 2019 - 07:20 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 7,990
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014

View PostCuck0osNest, on 11 February 2019 - 07:15 PM, said:

Learn to play and maybe you will be good in developer's pay to win system.

 

Well we ain't the ones with a 51% win rate the last 133 games.

FluffyRedFox #15 Posted 11 February 2019 - 07:22 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 25286 battles
  • 9,138
  • [FLOOF] FLOOF
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012

View PostSuedKAT, on 11 February 2019 - 06:20 PM, said:

 

Well we ain't the ones with a 51% win rate the last 133 games.

But he didn't buy his, like you filthy winrate buying non-reload aiming noob



SuedKAT #16 Posted 11 February 2019 - 07:28 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 7,990
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014

View PostFluffyRedFox, on 11 February 2019 - 07:22 PM, said:

But he didn't buy his, like you filthy winrate buying non-reload aiming noob

 

Ouch, that's a big no no, in that case I would suggest the fifth book in the Dinger tanking for nubs handbook series:

 


Edited by SuedKAT, 11 February 2019 - 07:28 PM.


kubawt112 #17 Posted 11 February 2019 - 08:00 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 3378 battles
  • 752
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostSfinski, on 11 February 2019 - 06:52 AM, said:

Shouldn't you win more than anybody else if you were the best?

 

Fair chance he's in the 99th percentile, though, to be fair.

 

View PostFluffyRedFox, on 11 February 2019 - 07:22 PM, said:

But he didn't buy his, like you filthy winrate buying non-reload aiming noob

 

I wonder what Cuck's view on the Dingers are. You must be like the antichrist to him. :D

AliceUnchained #18 Posted 11 February 2019 - 08:35 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 39029 battles
  • 9,502
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011
Oh look, it's that one again. He/sheIt is so beyond special we really need to invent a new word for that level of special...

unhappy_bunny #19 Posted 11 February 2019 - 11:48 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 19784 battles
  • 3,516
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

View PostAliceUnchained, on 11 February 2019 - 07:35 PM, said:

Oh look, it's that one again. He/sheIt is so beyond special we really need to invent a new word for that level of special...

 

How about specialastic?

Cuck0osNest #20 Posted 12 February 2019 - 07:59 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13086 battles
  • 1,082
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016
I don't add people to my ignore list.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users