Jump to content

Has XP been nerfed on FL ?

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

BdW_Marecc #1 Posted 12 February 2019 - 03:53 PM


  • Player
  • 11521 battles
  • 117
  • [BPG_G] BPG_G
  • Member since:

So I played 5 or 6 hours yesterday and I kept rotating my Jagdpanther 2 and AMX 50-100 in and out, together with some premiums. But at the end of the day the XP I received was ... mediocre. I thought "well, maybe better luck tomorrow" but then I saw similar posts pop up on Reddit. So it's not only me who thinks XP is a bit on the slow side ?

What's your experience ? Anyone else think that FL is now actually worse for grinding than Randoms ?

Rati_Festa #2 Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:07 PM


  • Player
  • 49299 battles
  • 2,377
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
Wont you need to state your exp per hour on FL and then compare it to randoms to get a clear answer?

Balc0ra #3 Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:22 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 72848 battles
  • 20,707
  • Member since:

On screens compared to last years event when I find simular results. It's more or less around the same. Then again, like randoms. XP is still dependent on how you do said damage. As with a bigger map, the chances of doing damage on others spotting is way bigger.


BR33K1_PAWAH #4 Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:29 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 6467 battles
  • 1,413
  • Member since:
Idk, but xp income isn't that impressive in FL, unless you regularly get General ranks.

Geno1isme #5 Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:44 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 48124 battles
  • 10,223
  • Member since:

You'll likely make somewhat less XP/hour in Frontline than in random, esp. when you're doing a focused grind. You can play like 2-4 random games for each frontline game regarding time. But you have more control about which tanks you focus on, and frontline doesn't get the daily double bonus.


It's hard to verify as there are no (public) stats recorded for frontline, so one would have to actually write the results down manually for evaluation.

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users