Jump to content


What's your Rush-/Raubtier-/RighteousnessRating?

healthy gameplay rushrating rr serious constructive wot teamplay [-UM] Certified Post [-MM] Recruitment Thread

  • Please log in to reply
100 replies to this topic

Alabamatick #61 Posted 20 February 2019 - 08:24 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 31849 battles
  • 3,297
  • Member since:
    04-11-2011
Tell me how to pad it first, then i'll tell you what it is

Cuck0osNest #62 Posted 20 February 2019 - 08:26 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 12928 battles
  • 1,082
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016

View PostAlabamatick, on 20 February 2019 - 08:24 PM, said:

Tell me how to pad it first, then i'll tell you what it is

 

You are already asking this question in the wrong topic.

Alabamatick #63 Posted 20 February 2019 - 08:32 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 31849 battles
  • 3,297
  • Member since:
    04-11-2011

View PostCuck0osNest, on 20 February 2019 - 07:26 PM, said:

 

You are already asking this question in the wrong topic.

 

But does that raise or lower my RR :unsure:

Cannes76 #64 Posted 20 February 2019 - 09:06 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 70277 battles
  • 1,882
  • [TAKE] TAKE
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011

6.8273148045828

Edit. Just looked various players ratings and wtf? What is this rating system even trying to show? Baffling...


Edited by Cannes76, 20 February 2019 - 09:12 PM.


Minio #65 Posted 20 February 2019 - 09:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 42438 battles
  • 667
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

battles: 41540
battle_avg_xp: 858
wins: 24697
winrate: 59.45
spotted: 1.7
survival: 33.08
charmed: 358
kamikaze: 61
platoon awards: 197
avg_tier: 0


VF: 9.460101
plat_kf: 0.47448242657679
avf: 6.7356492477143
skill1: 0
skill2: 0
skill3: 0
skill4: 0.52728428571429
skill5: 0

RR: 7.2629335334286

 

Is that good or bad?

We need a range to understand if it's worth anything...


Edited by Minio, 20 February 2019 - 09:41 PM.


WindSplitter1 #66 Posted 20 February 2019 - 10:10 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 18458 battles
  • 2,925
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostWindSpIitter1, on 20 February 2019 - 10:49 AM, said:

 

Why are you pretending to be me?


Edited by Rilleta, 20 February 2019 - 10:12 PM.


Captain_Kremen0 #67 Posted 21 February 2019 - 08:52 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38257 battles
  • 1,929
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    06-04-2011

View Posteekeeboo, on 20 February 2019 - 05:38 PM, said:

 

Why you pretending to be me?! :justwait:

 

All very well but how big (or small) is yours?:girl:

Jauhesammutin #68 Posted 21 February 2019 - 10:42 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23031 battles
  • 372
  • [KANKI] KANKI
  • Member since:
    11-05-2013

I know this rating is just a joke, but how can you make a rating so inconsistent?

 

Skill 1 Kamikaze. I understand this one perfectly well.

Skill 2 spotting. This one is pretty clear also

Skill 3 "F2P indicator". This one is connected to skill 2 so if you spot a lot you can get a good "F2P" rating even if you run premium time. But if you spot a lot it means you get more XP which then lowers your F2P indicator.

Skill 4 is survival rate. With low survival rate you get high rating. So the idea is that you go in the middle of the battle. Ok I get that. But that grants you more XP than sniping from a distance which then lowers your "F2P indicator".

Skill 5 is whatever. More HoG's give you better rating. But HoG requires you to survive a battle which then lowers your Skill 4. Skill 5 is also affected by skill 3 which is affected by skill 2.

 

So for a good rating you need to spot, but not get good XP. Go in the middle of the fight but not actually fight. Instead do Kamikaze's and die. Try to get as many HoGs as you can while trying to die?.. RubbishRating indeed.


Edited by Jauhesammutin, 21 February 2019 - 10:43 AM.


LordMuffin #69 Posted 21 February 2019 - 10:51 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 50000 battles
  • 12,203
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View PostJauhesammutin, on 21 February 2019 - 10:42 AM, said:

I know this rating is just a joke, but how can you make a rating so inconsistent?

 

Skill 1 Kamikaze. I understand this one perfectly well.

Skill 2 spotting. This one is pretty clear also

Skill 3 "F2P indicator". This one is connected to skill 2 so if you spot a lot you can get a good "F2P" rating even if you run premium time. But if you spot a lot it means you get more XP which then lowers your F2P indicator.

Skill 4 is survival rate. With low survival rate you get high rating. So the idea is that you go in the middle of the battle. Ok I get that. But that grants you more XP than sniping from a distance which then lowers your "F2P indicator".

Skill 5 is whatever. More HoG's give you better rating. But HoG requires you to survive a battle which then lowers your Skill 4. Skill 5 is also affected by skill 3 which is affected by skill 2.

 

So for a good rating you need to spot, but not get good XP. Go in the middle of the fight but not actually fight. Instead do Kamikaze's and die. Try to get as many HoGs as you can while trying to die?.. RubbishRating indeed.

And from glancing at the names, it seems that players with high wn8/WR also get this rating high,  while players with low wr/wn8 get low in this rating.

Exception being qprANGER.

 

you are free to check if this is true or not.



Jahpero #70 Posted 21 February 2019 - 10:55 AM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 10354 battles
  • 1,640
  • [N00T] N00T
  • Member since:
    07-03-2017
Hello everyone, 

I removed few post inappropriate from the thread. 

Have a good day ! 
Jahpero


Siphaeon #71 Posted 21 February 2019 - 11:10 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 13862 battles
  • 88
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011

RR: 2.0663020237664

Whatever that means :teethhappy:



eekeeboo #72 Posted 21 February 2019 - 11:14 AM

    English Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 46254 battles
  • 2,250
  • Member since:
    07-25-2010

View PostCaptain_Kremen0, on 21 February 2019 - 07:52 AM, said:

 

All very well but how big (or small) is yours?:girl:

 

​42.1! :izmena:

 

Spoiler

 



Wannabe_Knispel #73 Posted 21 February 2019 - 11:15 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 54140 battles
  • 18
  • [BADFI] BADFI
  • Member since:
    08-28-2013
RR: 2.9121983816892:hiding:

kaneloon #74 Posted 21 February 2019 - 11:46 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 29951 battles
  • 2,733
  • [FR2DB] FR2DB
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011

RR: 2.4320066918912

 

I probably should stop playing arty ... but I am good with it is too much fun  :hiding:



mango91 #75 Posted 21 February 2019 - 11:52 AM

    Captain

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 43408 battles
  • 2,147
  • [ORKI] ORKI
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

RR: 4.3836744489367

 

hell I'm average also in this.

 

BTW qpranger lier, you tricky hamster



WindSpIitter1 #76 Posted 21 February 2019 - 12:13 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 278 battles
  • 1,135
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    01-13-2017

View PostRilleta, on 20 February 2019 - 10:10 PM, said:

 

Why are you pretending to be me?

 

May I suggest prescription glasses? As far as I can see, we don't have the same name. If anything, it appears that you're pretending to be me - seeing as you have my name in your signature. Dunno why you'd want that. If this happened to be your former nickname, I wonder why you didn't keep it if you liked it so much.

 

I'm happy to see another fan of ninja stars, though. Oh, and if people thought you had rerolled and joined a dedicated clan -  60-odd percent winrate and a three-marked STA-2 is pretty good, isn't it? :)

 

View PostLordMuffin, on 21 February 2019 - 10:51 AM, said:

And from glancing at the names, it seems that players with high wn8/WR also get this rating high,  while players with low wr/wn8 get low in this rating.

Exception being qprANGER.

 

you are free to check if this is true or not.

 

Well, nothing's perfect. If RR could filter out the 'WN8 padlers', then it's certainly a worthwhile tool. Perhaps it would make sense to make a scale, and deduct if the values don't line up?

 

As silly as it sounds, and despite the bad roleplay in the OP, I'm actually serious in that RR is a good idea. I'm a bit critical of the execution, but good-effing-luck padling your RR effectively (unless you have a lot of Kamikazes).


Edited by WindSpIitter1, 21 February 2019 - 12:15 PM.


Jumping_Turtle #77 Posted 21 February 2019 - 12:57 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 65425 battles
  • 6,173
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013
update the list you slowpoke ;)

Joggaman #78 Posted 21 February 2019 - 01:07 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 24935 battles
  • 6,755
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-23-2011

RR: 4.9059085776139

 

is that good or bad?



DuncaN_101 #79 Posted 21 February 2019 - 01:33 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 54592 battles
  • 2,580
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
It won't calculate mine for some reason.
It's probably not even registering that's how low it is

BravelyRanAway #80 Posted 21 February 2019 - 01:39 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 23426 battles
  • 10,744
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostDuncaN_101, on 21 February 2019 - 12:33 PM, said:

It won't calculate mine for some reason.
It's probably not even registering that's how low it is

RR: 1.2117779112423






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users