Jump to content


Make this stop


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
22 replies to this topic

dd_keky #1 Posted 09 March 2019 - 03:47 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 8311 battles
  • 32
  • [BESNI] BESNI
  • Member since:
    04-01-2013
Edited

Edited by Asklepi0s, 10 March 2019 - 10:56 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to Naming and Shaming


Laatikkomafia #2 Posted 09 March 2019 - 03:52 PM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 23076 battles
  • 4,948
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010

Mandatory naming and shaming comment.



SuedKAT #3 Posted 09 March 2019 - 03:57 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 7,741
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014
If anything the lovely bottom tier 3-5-7 MM he will get in that tier 8 tank almost all the matches he play will scare him away faster than anything you can ever say and do.

wsatnutter #4 Posted 09 March 2019 - 04:00 PM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 26044 battles
  • 9,157
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010
OP that player plays for fun like you should and stop naming and shaming

unhappy_bunny #5 Posted 09 March 2019 - 04:48 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 19371 battles
  • 3,278
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

So what tank was you in? And how did you do in that battle?

 

Its all very well picking out one player and showing his tanks, but how about showing the full results screen so we can see how the rest of the team did?



Jigabachi #6 Posted 09 March 2019 - 04:50 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 20,888
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

1. Naming and shaming. Remove the name.

2. It's stupid to blame it all on one guy.

3. What about players with >10k matches who still play like a new player in his first few matches?

4. Looks like a reroll/second account. It's not too bad.

5. If you look closely, you'll see that he is basically playing at your level. Bonuspoints for you having the majority of your 6k matches in hightier tanks, too.



Homer_J #7 Posted 09 March 2019 - 05:08 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 31398 battles
  • 34,111
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postdd_keky, on 09 March 2019 - 02:47 PM, said:

So after battle i noticed my top tier tank a t-34 had only 390 dmg done, ofc we lost. So i went on to check his in game profile and this is what i have discoverd.
Enjoy ruining game even more with allowing players to buy a high premium tanks even tho they have 100 battles and they have no clue whats they job once battle is on.
 

 

So in your opinion he has ruined maybe 100 battles whereas in someone else's opinion you have ruined about 3500.  Pot, Kettle, black.

sniper_pixie #8 Posted 09 March 2019 - 05:52 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 55981 battles
  • 259
  • Member since:
    12-15-2011

At least your T34 did some damage. I've just played a game where one of our top tier tanks was playing his 26th game in total in a Skorpion G, with average damage per game of 0.

 

We have two EU servers. One should be for players with win rates of above average and the other for below.



Homer_J #9 Posted 09 March 2019 - 05:58 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 31398 battles
  • 34,111
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postsniper_pixie, on 09 March 2019 - 04:52 PM, said:

One should be for players with win rates of above average and the other for below.

 

Yes that will work so well.  :rolleyes:

 

Maths not your strong point is it?



sniper_pixie #10 Posted 09 March 2019 - 06:10 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 55981 battles
  • 259
  • Member since:
    12-15-2011

View PostHomer_J, on 09 March 2019 - 04:58 PM, said:

 

Yes that will work so well.  :rolleyes:

 

Maths not your strong point is it?

 

How so?

spamhamstar #11 Posted 09 March 2019 - 06:16 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 64313 battles
  • 2,023
  • [LLAY] LLAY
  • Member since:
    12-02-2012

View Postsniper_pixie, on 09 March 2019 - 05:10 PM, said:

 

How so?

 

Think how your suggestion would work if only players with either above or below average win rates were facing each other.

 

 



vasilinhorulezz #12 Posted 09 March 2019 - 06:27 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 23240 battles
  • 1,483
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014
Don't try to educate the idiots, it doesn't work.

malachi6 #13 Posted 09 March 2019 - 06:30 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 50920 battles
  • 3,920
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

That guy wins as many games in his T34 as you do overall.  What's your boggle, a single game?

 

Play one game on the above average server; lose.  Immediately go to the below average server; win.  Go back to the better server.  



sniper_pixie #14 Posted 09 March 2019 - 06:30 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 55981 battles
  • 259
  • Member since:
    12-15-2011

I have. Bad players and bots can avoid seal clubbers and have fun on one server while people who know how to play can avoid them on the other. Play well enough on the bad server and you get promoted next time you log on. Keep losing on the good server and you go down to the bad one. The win rate bell curve should flatten out, but if your objective in the game is to enjoy it and not just concentrate on win rates then so what?

 



malachi6 #15 Posted 09 March 2019 - 06:31 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 50920 battles
  • 3,920
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View Postvasilinhorulezz, on 09 March 2019 - 06:27 PM, said:

Don't try to educate the idiots, it doesn't work.

 

Quite right.  After all, the forums has rules regarding insults.  Yet some people just cannot learn.  The irony is awesome.

WindSplitter1 #16 Posted 09 March 2019 - 09:07 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18709 battles
  • 3,114
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016
This thread made my day.

CraftyVeteran #17 Posted 10 March 2019 - 05:23 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6317 battles
  • 561
  • [-B2C-] -B2C-
  • Member since:
    05-03-2016
I want morons to get banned for knocking others off cliffs to skirt team damage policy but no matter how many replays I send it they never do.  Wish in one hand....

7thSyndicate #18 Posted 10 March 2019 - 07:18 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 45370 battles
  • 383
  • Member since:
    10-09-2012
Cool Story

HanZi #19 Posted 10 March 2019 - 07:24 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 46945 battles
  • 297
  • [-NFD-] -NFD-
  • Member since:
    02-26-2011

View Postdd_keky, on 09 March 2019 - 03:47 PM, said:

So after battle i noticed my top tier tank a t-34 had only 390 dmg done, ofc we lost. So i went on to check his in game profile and this is what i have discoverd.
Enjoy ruining game even more with allowing players to buy a high premium tanks even tho they have 100 battles and they have no clue whats they job once battle is on.
 

 

He or she has a point here.

PowJay #20 Posted 10 March 2019 - 08:16 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 38065 battles
  • 4,741
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

WG make a lot of noise about banning players for unfair mods and (apparently) the use of automated bots, but every single day we see players who achieve NOTHING in battle after battle and WG could not care less.

 

I don't even mind so much if players try. Every now and again they might make a difference. The ones that simply do not care and yet are allowed to play make the mind boggle.


 

I have reported a mid tier T29 who camped in a spot where he could not do a darned thing. He admitted that he "likes to watch". Replay to WG and he is "not breaking any rules" because players are "Free to play as they choose" Edit. He is still playing. Black and red colours against almost all his stats. He does at least appear to be trying, though. That's something, I guess.


 

I recently watched a player drown at the opening of the battle. His stats suggests that he suicides just about every single match (and this was top tier as well iirc). WG don't care because if he is reported often enough, the system will catch him. :facepalm:


Edited by PowJay, 10 March 2019 - 09:01 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users