Jump to content


Speechless


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
12 replies to this topic

Vikingmakt #1 Posted 18 March 2019 - 01:47 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10254 battles
  • 27
  • [IAAN] IAAN
  • Member since:
    04-13-2016
Hi again fellow commanders!

Here you have a perfect example why WG´s customer service is bad and so unprofessional and rude. They just closed the topic I started (http://forum.worldof...e-in-the-world/). The moderator (Asklepi0s) is really doing his job. He closed the topic accusing me that I allegedly started this topic because of some bans. He did NOT even read the topic! I started the topic regardless and before I got any bans. My problem was totally different and is presented in the mentioned topic (I hope that you can read). Anyway not even the problem was a reason that I started the topic. The reason was that WG´s customer service is not answering us, customers. They have those "robot" answers that they are sending to us and closing tickets without giving us a proper answer. As you can see is not only the tickets but also topics that are not consistent with WG´s policy. They are just leaving you speechless and astonished that stuff can be so unprofessional and rude to customers that are holding this game alive. Speechless.

Laatikkomafia #2 Posted 18 March 2019 - 01:57 PM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 23076 battles
  • 4,954
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010


SiliconSidewinder #3 Posted 18 March 2019 - 05:10 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 28504 battles
  • 6,493
  • Member since:
    09-16-2012
speechless indeed :D , say dear OP did you read the forum rules?

Seldarine #4 Posted 18 March 2019 - 05:25 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 19531 battles
  • 121
  • Member since:
    09-02-2010
Speechless maybe, but unfortunately not typeless. 

Vikingmakt #5 Posted 18 March 2019 - 05:29 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10254 battles
  • 27
  • [IAAN] IAAN
  • Member since:
    04-13-2016

View PostSiliconSidewinder, on 18 March 2019 - 05:10 PM, said:

speechless indeed :D , say dear OP did you read the forum rules?

 

Tell me dear OP are you thinking about any specific rule? Multiposting maybe?

You do not have to agree with my point of view but please do not blindly defend WG...

16:31 Added after 1 minute

View PostSeldarine, on 18 March 2019 - 05:25 PM, said:

Speechless maybe, but unfortunately not typeless. 

 

Something in specific?

Nishi_Kinuyo #6 Posted 18 March 2019 - 05:51 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 8397 battles
  • 5,644
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

Discussing moderator sanctions...

Yeah, that's not allowed on the forum.



Vikingmakt #7 Posted 18 March 2019 - 06:03 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10254 battles
  • 27
  • [IAAN] IAAN
  • Member since:
    04-13-2016

View PostNishi_Kinuyo, on 18 March 2019 - 05:51 PM, said:

Discussing moderator sanctions...

Yeah, that's not allowed on the forum.

 

I am not discussing moderator sanctions. The point of my discussion is to show how WG´s is working with regards to customers. In my opinion it is very unprofessional and just rude.

Jigabachi #8 Posted 18 March 2019 - 06:13 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 20,920
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

The thread was three pages long, two of which were about you refusing to elaborate your point and thus just useless. But it didn't get much better when you finally explained your standpoint, so the lock was just a matter of time - just like the lock for this thread, except that the reason for the lock is more obvious this time.

 

View PostVikingmakt, on 18 March 2019 - 06:03 PM, said:

I am not discussing moderator sanctions. 

You did.


Edited by Jigabachi, 18 March 2019 - 06:15 PM.


Vikingmakt #9 Posted 18 March 2019 - 07:07 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10254 battles
  • 27
  • [IAAN] IAAN
  • Member since:
    04-13-2016

View PostJigabachi, on 18 March 2019 - 06:13 PM, said:

The thread was three pages long, two of which were about you refusing to elaborate your point and thus just useless. But it didn't get much better when you finally explained your standpoint, so the lock was just a matter of time - just like the lock for this thread, except that the reason for the lock is more obvious this time.

 

You did.

This is not even worth my comments. Whatever floats your boat...

jack_timber #10 Posted 18 March 2019 - 07:31 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 37452 battles
  • 2,852
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014

Did you read and digest these.... http://forum.worldof...nks-game-rules/

Likely not, next please.



Jigabachi #11 Posted 18 March 2019 - 08:27 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 20,920
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostVikingmakt, on 18 March 2019 - 07:07 PM, said:

This is not even worth my comments. Whatever floats your boat...

No need for a comment, I just stated some simple facts. But as before, feel free to tell me where I'm wrong with anything I wrote there.

But if you want to do that, better do it fast - threadlock incoming.



Vikingmakt #12 Posted 18 March 2019 - 08:36 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10254 battles
  • 27
  • [IAAN] IAAN
  • Member since:
    04-13-2016

View PostJigabachi, on 18 March 2019 - 08:27 PM, said:

No need for a comment, I just stated some simple facts. But as before, feel free to tell me where I'm wrong with anything I wrote there.

But if you want to do that, better do it fast - threadlock incoming.

 

I am going to pass on that. It is pointless with you.

I am just amazed that everybody cares so much about forum rules and general love to WG but nobody is at least a little bit critical about what they are doing. No comments.

Jahpero #13 Posted 19 March 2019 - 12:05 PM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 10753 battles
  • 1,664
  • [N00T] N00T
  • Member since:
    07-03-2017

Hello everyone, 

Since this thread is discussing forum moderation, it is now locked.

 

Thank you for your understanding.
Jahpero

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users