Jump to content


Could we have a 9.17 patch server?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
6 replies to this topic

RenamedUser_555746413 #1 Posted 01 April 2019 - 11:15 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 3108 battles
  • 96
  • Member since:
    06-13-2018

so 7.0 clearly shows WG can run 2 versions of the game and as the new MM, arty buffs, 468v4 bs, 1.0 HD maps. new maps, maps changed  etc have ruined WOT (although it was far from perfect then!!) and have driven so many players out of the game could we have a 9.17 version playable full time

 

although the italian tanks are fine, there aint anything else  since 9.17 that's been any good and I would love old erlenberg, Kharkov, Stalingrad, old fishermans bay, even old fjords back in the game



Frostilicus #2 Posted 01 April 2019 - 11:26 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 22733 battles
  • 3,294
  • [-ZNO-] -ZNO-
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011

+1 

Maybe the Classic could host different versions of the game for a set period every so often



sokolicc #3 Posted 01 April 2019 - 11:33 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 27163 battles
  • 186
  • [GOOFY] GOOFY
  • Member since:
    04-14-2016

NO, NO, FOR THE LOVE OF SERB!

Type 5 got overbuffed in that patch.

9.14-15-16 would be nicer to see.

 

Also, did you saw how nice were Fjords in classic patch?

Also, Fisherman's bay .It had vawes on the ground, little hills and valleys so you can use terrain, maybe escape. Not this flat crapwe have now. -_-



OMG_Abaddon #4 Posted 01 April 2019 - 11:37 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11789 battles
  • 744
  • [BDCP] BDCP
  • Member since:
    04-19-2011

View PostRenamedUser_555746413, on 01 April 2019 - 11:15 AM, said:

so 7.0 clearly shows WG can run 2 versions of the game 

 

That's some pointless argument, you can run as many versions of the game as you wish as long as your server has the resources to do so. The problem with that statement is that you'll be dividing the community for each version you add, and they'd have to fill games with bots. Which wouldn't mean anything to be honest as the vast majority of players I encounter lately look like they are playing with NES controllers.



RenamedUser_555746413 #5 Posted 01 April 2019 - 11:39 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 3108 battles
  • 96
  • Member since:
    06-13-2018

View PostOMG_Abaddon, on 01 April 2019 - 11:37 AM, said:

 

That's some pointless argument, you can run as many versions of the game as you wish as long as your server has the resources to do so. The problem with that statement is that you'll be dividing the community for each version you add, and they'd have to fill games with bots. Which wouldn't mean anything to be honest as the vast majority of players I encounter lately look like they are playing with NES controllers.

 

perhaps, but there might be over 2000000 players that might come back

Geno1isme #6 Posted 01 April 2019 - 11:46 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 45858 battles
  • 9,528
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

Wouldn't be surprised if we see other patch versions in future iterations of the classic server, maybe one from each year since 2011:

- 0.7.5 or 0.8 from 2012

- 0.8.7 or 0.8.9 from 2013

- 0.8.11 or 0.9.3 from 2014

- 0.9.10 or 0.9.12 from 2015

- 0.9.15 or 0.9.16 from 2016

- 0.9.20 from 2017

- 1.2 from 2018

 

I doubt they added a complete subforum for this single testrun.



Asklepi0s #7 Posted 01 April 2019 - 11:50 AM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 9566 battles
  • 1,001
  • Member since:
    01-23-2017
Thread is closed.
Please remember rules are there for reason ! 

8. Don’t try to cheat the punishment system
If you have been banned, the moderation team can automatically ban all your alternate accounts on the forums.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users