Jump to content


a Suggestion for a new Chinese Heavy Tank.

113 114

  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

The_Naa #1 Posted 04 April 2019 - 01:42 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 5239 battles
  • 666
  • [QSF-L] QSF-L
  • Member since:
    11-10-2017

Hello :)

 

yesterday when i was playing my 113 i got ammo racked and as result of it i got a idea for a brand new Chinese Heavy Tank.

 

Meet the 114:

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

stats would be the same as the 113 but with that sweet rear mounted turret. :rolleyes:

 

 


Edited by The_Naa, 04 April 2019 - 01:46 PM.


eekeeboo #2 Posted 04 April 2019 - 02:00 PM

    English Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 46244 battles
  • 2,250
  • Member since:
    07-25-2010

How a new Tech tree is born! Fascinating! 

 

I do look at that engine deck though and think juicy arty shell landing pad! 



The_Naa #3 Posted 04 April 2019 - 02:03 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 5239 battles
  • 666
  • [QSF-L] QSF-L
  • Member since:
    11-10-2017

View Posteekeeboo, on 04 April 2019 - 02:00 PM, said:

How a new Tech tree is born! Fascinating! 

 

I do look at that engine deck though and think juicy arty shell landing pad! 

bring it on.

i always carry a spall liner as i am a anti-arty extremist when it comes to playing a heavy tank. 

kubawt112 #4 Posted 04 April 2019 - 02:05 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 3378 battles
  • 533
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View Posteekeeboo, on 04 April 2019 - 02:00 PM, said:

How a new Tech tree is born! Fascinating!

(...)

 

Some may get the impression that you're implying that the Chinese TDs may have been sourced from very sekrit documents similar to the above. :P

 

On a more serious note, will we ever see an article about the Chinese TDs or Japanese HTs akin to the 50B history?

I'm honestly curious how WG produced certain designs, that seem to have no material available (and frankly don't care if they're made up, they look like tanks).



hasnainrakha57 #5 Posted 04 April 2019 - 02:20 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 15212 battles
  • 818
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

View PostThe_Naa, on 04 April 2019 - 12:42 PM, said:

Hello :)

 

yesterday when i was playing my 113 i got ammo racked and as result of it i got a idea for a brand new Chinese Heavy Tank.

 

Meet the 114:

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

stats would be the same as the 113 but with that sweet rear mounted turret. :rolleyes:

 

 

Well those 3 tanks behind you tells me that u was in critical situation !



The_Naa #6 Posted 04 April 2019 - 02:29 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 5239 battles
  • 666
  • [QSF-L] QSF-L
  • Member since:
    11-10-2017

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 04 April 2019 - 02:20 PM, said:

Well those 3 tanks behind you tells me that u was in critical situation !

 

yeah, thats about right.

hasnainrakha57 #7 Posted 04 April 2019 - 06:13 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 15212 battles
  • 818
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

View PostThe_Naa, on 04 April 2019 - 01:29 PM, said:

 

yeah, thats about right.

Op 907

Op 430u

1050dmg jagero 

 

 


Edited by hasnainrakha57, 04 April 2019 - 06:14 PM.


Nishi_Kinuyo #8 Posted 04 April 2019 - 06:33 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 8288 battles
  • 5,485
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011
Eh, the China tree is already full of fakes, so one more wouldn't matter.

Shacou #9 Posted 05 April 2019 - 10:27 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21502 battles
  • 857
  • [D-NUT] D-NUT
  • Member since:
    11-07-2011
Whole chinese tree is powercreeped except for WZ5A and maybe a t10 TD. The rest needs to be reworked or new vehicles need to be added. Cannot wait for their promised "rework". I'm a fanboyo of chinese tree.

LordSkyFury #10 Posted 05 April 2019 - 10:29 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14042 battles
  • 136
  • [R_D1] R_D1
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014
It is 113 B.





Also tagged with 113, 114

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users