Jump to content


Do you like winning easily against bot teams?


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

Poll: Do you like winning easily against bot teams? (39 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Do you like winning easily against bot teams?

  1. Yes, I enjoy easy wins against weaker teams courtesy of WG (8 votes [20.51%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.51%

  2. No, I want more balanced and challenging battles (31 votes [79.49%])

    Percentage of vote: 79.49%

Vote Hide poll

qpranger #1 Posted 08 April 2019 - 08:47 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 35973 battles
  • 5,933
  • [HAMMY] HAMMY
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

You know, those comfortable 4-minute 15-4 roflstomps,

do you actually enjoy them and don't think you deserve better opponents?



Sennh #2 Posted 08 April 2019 - 08:52 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 2414 battles
  • 33
  • Member since:
    07-07-2014
i'm a bot myself, well this is what the insults that i get in game, tell me. because i don't try to destroy the wheeled vehicles with my slow tanks.

Edited by Sennh, 08 April 2019 - 08:53 PM.


qpranger #3 Posted 08 April 2019 - 09:11 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 35973 battles
  • 5,933
  • [HAMMY] HAMMY
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View PostSennh, on 08 April 2019 - 09:52 PM, said:

because i don't try to destroy the wheeled vehicles with my slow tanks.

 

The only reason, huh?

KarmaMint #4 Posted 08 April 2019 - 09:27 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 72
  • Member since:
    12-29-2018
Nope, i play the game for fun. Win or lose as long as it's fun and even match

Renesco #5 Posted 08 April 2019 - 09:32 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 24692 battles
  • 753
  • [SOBAD] SOBAD
  • Member since:
    10-08-2010
I like my wins like I like my women, easy

Dorander #6 Posted 08 April 2019 - 09:40 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 19620 battles
  • 4,233
  • Member since:
    05-07-2012
Neither. I don't enjoy them, and for someone to be deserving of something there has to be a good reason for that entitlement, in this case there just isn't one imaginable. I also fear the question itself is a bit loaded with some preconceived conclusion about "fixing" the method in which teams are generated which is just an age old topic which isn't likely to actually improve the game (at this point, or even at all).

lnfernaI #7 Posted 08 April 2019 - 09:42 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 30879 battles
  • 4,000
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

View PostKarmaMint, on 08 April 2019 - 10:27 PM, said:

Nope, i play the game for fun. 

Is that the excuse the bad players use to voice their reasons of playing?



Taudlitz #8 Posted 08 April 2019 - 10:24 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22326 battles
  • 355
  • Member since:
    06-15-2011
I hate it even more than being on bot teams, there I can at least farm some damage before its over.

Laur_Balaur_XD #9 Posted 08 April 2019 - 10:30 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 37100 battles
  • 721
  • [FUSED] FUSED
  • Member since:
    04-20-2011

I prefer a lost game that was closed and where every action counted to a winning roflstomp. 

At 15-0 results sometimes you can't deal enough damage no matter how aggressive you play and it feels like beating a bunch of snails with a baseball bat....:(



OIias_of_Sunhillow #10 Posted 08 April 2019 - 10:39 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 25570 battles
  • 3,095
  • Member since:
    07-20-2011

I've been in a few of those 15-0/1/2, kind of games, both winning, and getting hammered.

 

I've been in one of those teams that are well co-ordinated, attack minded, and map-observant. That have utterly knackered the enemy team in four minutes, and the buzz is great.

It's not so great when you're in one of those teams and you're chasing the battle without getting a shot off.

Particularly when it's your first win of the day. :angry:

 

It works both ways of course.

 

But you deal with whatever cards are dealt you by WG. It is what it is.



kubawt112 #11 Posted 08 April 2019 - 10:42 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 3378 battles
  • 533
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

Nah. Much more fun with a close loss, or a fight that isn't reminiscent of certain colonial-era battle.

(Though I found it strangely comical to meet the same enemy platoon three times in a row, and plowing them every time.)

 

I'm less certain that it would be easy, or even possible, to solve. Perhaps that is part of the reasoning behind the map design - not that it helps much because there are so many variables in WoT. Player skill, numbers, tanks, down to good ol' RNGesus.



Jigabachi #12 Posted 08 April 2019 - 11:19 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 20,760
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Nope, those are just as boring as the defeats.

Toni112007 #13 Posted 08 April 2019 - 11:43 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11057 battles
  • 706
  • Member since:
    11-18-2013
What I hate the most in this game are one sided battles where you aren't able to do much damage cause enemy team is so bad. Id rather lose with good damage tbh.

Edited by Toni112007, 08 April 2019 - 11:43 PM.


Bracciano_gatto #14 Posted 08 April 2019 - 11:53 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 2106 battles
  • 263
  • Member since:
    09-07-2018

View PostlnfernaI, on 08 April 2019 - 09:42 PM, said:

Is that the excuse the bad players use to voice their reasons of playing?

 

No, it's what most players say because they actually do play for fun: a novel concept, I know !

Some take tonks way too seriously, this is a game.

 

Having said that, blowouts, win or lose, are not fun.

 


Edited by Bracciano_gatto, 08 April 2019 - 11:54 PM.


Baldrickk #15 Posted 09 April 2019 - 11:25 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 31954 battles
  • 15,809
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-03-2013

let me re-use a previous post:

Block Quote

 

I don't know where this claim comes from, or why it keeps getting repeated. 

 

Your team-mates and your enemies are all outside your control. 

The nature of random MM is that everything balances out.

As far as any player is concerned, prior to their having an input into each battle, that battle is equivalent to any other battle, that any other player will play.

They don't get easier battles than anyone else be cause they are a good player. 

If they sat afk every battle their result would be the same as anyone else who did that. 

They just do better because they play better. 

 

 



SuedKAT #16 Posted 09 April 2019 - 11:30 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 7,711
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014
I don't play a PvP game to get a PvE experience, so no I don't find the roflstomps enjoyable regardless of the side I'm on, but sadly with current maps and tank balance that's reality far to often.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users