Jump to content


General Feedback

1.5 Public Test

  • Please log in to reply
183 replies to this topic

vuque #1 Posted 10 April 2019 - 01:39 PM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 18007 battles
  • 3,312
  • [YOQ] YOQ
  • Member since:
    08-05-2010

Hello Commanders, 

 

Please leave your general feedback regarding the 1.5 Public Test in this topic.

 

For feedback on specific topics from the test, please use the specific topics below: 

 

New Swedish Medium Tanks

Swedish Heavy Tanks Rebalance

SPG Rebalance

Grand Battles (for tier VIII)

Map Blacklist

New WoT Premium Account

Ranked Battles and Season Improvements

Grand Battles for Tier VIII

Changes to Japanese Heavy Tanks

Bug Report

 

Roll out!


Edited by vuque, Yesterday, 02:35 PM.


Naydenshaco #2 Posted 11 April 2019 - 06:56 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 18449 battles
  • 16
  • [BAT-S] BAT-S
  • Member since:
    10-19-2015
*edited*  

Edited by Jahpero, 12 April 2019 - 04:53 PM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to off-topic.


Naydenshaco #3 Posted 11 April 2019 - 07:07 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 18449 battles
  • 16
  • [BAT-S] BAT-S
  • Member since:
    10-19-2015
Btw weren't we promised 700 dmg hesh on types and 900 dmg on HE ? Why they have same dmg AGAIN but 3 times more pen on premium hesh? So once again pay to win tank as it used to be just with less dmg ( Or not since 200 pen hesh will still deal pretty much same dmg).

These are just bad.Don't do it.Or at least put 1100 as it used to be on standard HE.

Kolmiopaavo #4 Posted 11 April 2019 - 07:09 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 43860 battles
  • 1,218
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    06-28-2011
1st actually good looking update in a long time that I can remember, not that its gonna be enough to get me back to the game but nice to see the game taking some right direction after a long time.

_Arcanus #5 Posted 11 April 2019 - 07:10 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24006 battles
  • 29
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    06-25-2011

This looks like a solid patch, except for one aspect: The FV4005 nerfs. I can understand the Type 5 and Type 4 adjustments, since those tanks are met with utter disdain ever since their HE guns were added, but the nerf to the FV4005 is unnecessary and frankly too harsh. The FV is a one-trick pony, which excels at one thing only: an ocassional one shot on someone who makes a major mistake in the positioning of their tank. It gets spotted by everything, everywhere and every time. I am quite confident WG will find the community to react to this mistake in the same way as it did to the proposed 6 shot autoloader to the Bat-chat 25t - major disapproval, and I would appreciate them listening to the community the same way as they did in the Bat-chat situation.

 

edit: grammar

 

 


Edited by _Arcanus, 11 April 2019 - 07:11 PM.


prohunter00 #6 Posted 11 April 2019 - 07:12 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19881 battles
  • 14
  • [FIV3E] FIV3E
  • Member since:
    06-29-2013
Imagine 2 Type 5s facing and trying to pen each other with 290 pen:))))))).Or even a Maus:)))  

the_nebuchadnezzar #7 Posted 11 April 2019 - 07:32 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 51406 battles
  • 1,478
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    08-19-2013

WG, I still hope you are going to rework arty missions as well. 

About the patch, I think it's looking good. New tanks, map exclusion, nerfing Type's and the stupid FV4005, ranked battles... all sounds great. Hope you don't screw it up in the end like you always do...



ProMaster_2013 #8 Posted 11 April 2019 - 07:35 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 35840 battles
  • 23
  • [DTPT] DTPT
  • Member since:
    07-14-2013
#DontNerfFV4005
Great update, except 2 things...
1. The ability to exclude 2 maps with WoT Premium account, it should be for all players or for none.
2. Why the heack are you going to nerf the FV4005???? It is so bad already, it's like you take a bike and an 183mm gun, the tank only has the gun going for it, I mean, the excuse is that the WoT Replays has lots of replays with that tank with huge amounts of damage, but it is nonsense. I have the tank, and yeah sometimes it is great it hits and pens 90% of the shots (with gold) but those battles are like 1 in 50 or 1 in 100, in the other battles the gun doesn't pen and only makes splash dmg, or we get spoted and obliterated in a mater or 1-2 minutes. But as it is obvious, nobody will upload those replays to WoT Replays '-', basically there's no point in nerfing the FV4005 because it is already a bad tank but has a good gun, nothing else. Worst cammo than Maus, bad top speed, acceptable mobility, 0 armour and then there is the gun, that is awesome sometimes and very frustrating the other times...
#DontNerfFV4005
(I don't use # very often but I felt like I wanted to lol)

Promil1984 #9 Posted 11 April 2019 - 07:38 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37200 battles
  • 1,118
  • [PUNKS] PUNKS
  • Member since:
    03-25-2012
Ok... so anyone will explain to my why Type4 and Type5 will have less damage than tier 6? Yes, O-I has 910dmg on HE, E100 has 950, 60TP has 950 with similar RoF. 192mm HESH won't help to balance things out as you cannot penetrate most pancakes (soviet objects) with it anyway so all it will work against are some LT (except soviet ofcourse ;) ), japan med, czech med, swedish med, french med and italian med (sorry, forgot Leopard ;) ) This ammo will NOT work on heavily armored targets AT ALL. Nice "alternative and expensive" ammo... and soviet meds will still have 330-340mm HEATs since tier 8 (object 416). Yup, nice, nice. 290mm penetration on 14cm gun is a joke also. E100 has 334mm HEAT, Object705A has 317mm HEAT, 60TP has 317mm HEAT. Types have 282 (atm) AP. What exactly AP benefits there? Big penetration loss over distance and autobounce over 70ish degrees? Yay! Tiger II, Lowe, T34 and KV-4 have similar penetration on TIER 8! Ridiculous! 

Edited by Promil1984, 11 April 2019 - 07:42 PM.


Deztro #10 Posted 11 April 2019 - 07:38 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 50951 battles
  • 81
  • Member since:
    09-05-2013
Still not nerfing this disgusting premium ammo ? :(

DeadLecter #11 Posted 11 April 2019 - 07:40 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28812 battles
  • 1,395
  • Member since:
    05-28-2016
Great, now every clicker with premium acc bans 2 of the small corridor maps, probably Ensk and Himmelsdorf. So now we get 3 clickers every single game. Great job WG.

Ville67 #12 Posted 11 April 2019 - 07:48 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22849 battles
  • 247
  • [-NPS-] -NPS-
  • Member since:
    08-05-2013
Do you have any plans to nerf lower tier SPG's? We all know they are overpowered. Circonflexes and someone else (can't remember the name) made videos saying the exact problems with them. Are you going to ignore it?

Mind_Blower_1 #13 Posted 11 April 2019 - 07:51 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16915 battles
  • 11
  • [RINSE] RINSE
  • Member since:
    05-18-2015

The FV4005 nerf is too harsh, the tank is already hard to play, I can understand nerfing the dispersion, but traveerse and speed? really? the FV is left with nothing!

 

#DontnerfFV4005



fryster_12 #14 Posted 11 April 2019 - 07:52 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46327 battles
  • 898
  • [U_L] U_L
  • Member since:
    11-19-2012

All that needs nerfing about the FV005 Is the alpha damage that's it, changes to arty are welcome, still think it needs to be only 1 arty per team, would much rather have 1 arty in every battle than 3 arty in most battles, changes to prem account are brilliant, black listing maps also brilliant.



RagingGamerChris #15 Posted 11 April 2019 - 07:57 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5847 battles
  • 4
  • [TATOR] TATOR
  • Member since:
    12-16-2014
Oh wow I'm actually looking forward to the FV4005 nerf. This has to be the best update ever. Let all them clueless wannabe unicums start crying how it shouldnt get nerfed. Would be even better if this tank was removed from the game completely.

Promil1984 #16 Posted 11 April 2019 - 08:01 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37200 battles
  • 1,118
  • [PUNKS] PUNKS
  • Member since:
    03-25-2012
Make lightly armored TD with big gun even slower, Very heavy Object268v4 still outruns some MTs ;) yay, magic :D

FunkyTowel #17 Posted 11 April 2019 - 08:06 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 24360 battles
  • 87
  • [BGTC-] BGTC-
  • Member since:
    12-29-2012
Give the option to go back to the old English TD if you're going to make FV4005 garbage again. 
I want Stalinium armor on all my tanks.

Edited by FunkyTowel, 11 April 2019 - 08:07 PM.


az_zill #18 Posted 11 April 2019 - 08:28 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 38241 battles
  • 108
  • Member since:
    04-10-2014

Finally Type 4/5 gonna lose retarded p2w ammo. And it only took 2 years /s

M44 nerf when? 3 years from now?

Edited by az_zill, 11 April 2019 - 08:35 PM.


DeadLecter #19 Posted 11 April 2019 - 08:33 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28812 battles
  • 1,395
  • Member since:
    05-28-2016

View PostVille67, on 11 April 2019 - 10:18 PM, said:

Do you have any plans to nerf lower tier SPG's? We all know they are overpowered. Circonflexes and someone else (can't remember the name) made videos saying the exact problems with them. Are you going to ignore it?

 

You really think this is a feedback post? Name one time, something was said here and WG listened. When they want to do sth, they do it. They don't care about our feedback. Remember WVs. 90% of the posts were "don't add them". 

Wot_in_2k19 #20 Posted 11 April 2019 - 08:34 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 45647 battles
  • 284
  • Member since:
    08-14-2012

reverse speed -8km/h hahaha WG once again strikes with no brain 

#DontnerfFV4005







Also tagged with 1.5 Public Test

4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 1 anonymous users