Jump to content


Minelayers


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

PayMore #1 Posted 11 April 2019 - 11:34 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24886 battles
  • 357
  • [BWAH] BWAH
  • Member since:
    05-24-2013

WG seems to be positive to implement new stuff into the game like wheeled tanks, swedish/international tanks and tds with their X-mechanic. WG is allso good with nerfing things that a small minority dont like (arty). WG is allso very fond of making corridormaps. Those corredor maps limits the creativity of the players far beyond pressing 2. 

 

What WG should do to fix this, is to introduce minelayers to shut down corridors and mitigate the nerfs to arty and introducion of wheeled tanks. If the where pioneer tanks that could shoot mines into corridors to stop EBRs atc I think a lot of people would be happy.



pecopad #2 Posted 11 April 2019 - 11:45 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26379 battles
  • 1,476
  • [UGN] UGN
  • Member since:
    09-04-2015

Stop EBR is simple. 

 

Red line snipers instead of running to cover, should just shoot them.



PayMore #3 Posted 11 April 2019 - 02:15 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24886 battles
  • 357
  • [BWAH] BWAH
  • Member since:
    05-24-2013

View Postpecopad, on 11 April 2019 - 10:45 AM, said:

Stop EBR is simple. 

 

Red line snipers instead of running to cover, should just shoot them.

 

The mentality of redline sniprs is let others fix problems, that why the are redline sniprs. Your solution demands to much from them.

SaintMaddenus #4 Posted 11 April 2019 - 02:36 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 36711 battles
  • 2,108
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    03-04-2011

Minelayers would probably be a better consumable thing in frontline than artillery strike.   Just make it so it cant be put down where a tank is already present.

 

 



Balc0ra #5 Posted 11 April 2019 - 02:45 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 69705 battles
  • 18,740
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
We get it... you hate wheeled lights.

Nishi_Kinuyo #6 Posted 11 April 2019 - 05:57 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 8288 battles
  • 5,485
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

So basically, you want to promote camping even more?

Yeah, that's a totally good idea, of course. :facepalm:



Kicky92 #7 Posted 11 April 2019 - 06:17 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 15331 battles
  • 187
  • [EMRYS] EMRYS
  • Member since:
    04-21-2015
Can I have flamethrowers to burn the camping bushes instead?

UserZer00 #8 Posted 11 April 2019 - 06:39 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11925 battles
  • 768
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013

View PostKicky92, on 11 April 2019 - 06:17 PM, said:

Can I have flamethrowers to burn the camping bushes instead?

Why not both?

 



vasilinhorulezz #9 Posted 11 April 2019 - 06:41 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 23236 battles
  • 1,398
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



SiliconSidewinder #10 Posted 11 April 2019 - 06:49 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 28342 battles
  • 6,228
  • Member since:
    09-16-2012

half the maps consist of stupid small corners where you can only engage enemies from the front.

obviously we need more options to reduce intiative and tactical gameplay.



1ncompetenc3 #11 Posted 11 April 2019 - 09:46 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 37824 battles
  • 11,618
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013
I can't actually tell if OP is serious or not.

DeadLecter #12 Posted 11 April 2019 - 10:15 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28812 battles
  • 1,395
  • Member since:
    05-28-2016

View PostPayMore, on 11 April 2019 - 02:04 PM, said:

WG seems to be positive to implement new stuff into the game like wheeled tanks, swedish/international tanks and tds with their X-mechanic. WG is allso good with nerfing things that a small minority dont like (arty). WG is allso very fond of making corridormaps. Those corredor maps limits the creativity of the players far beyond pressing 2. 

 

What WG should do to fix this, is to introduce minelayers to shut down corridors and mitigate the nerfs to arty and introducion of wheeled tanks. If the where pioneer tanks that could shoot mines into corridors to stop EBRs atc I think a lot of people would be happy.

This line alone is enough to question your knowledge of what we want and not want. I have rarely seen any non-arty player have no problem with arty. Everyone hates arty. In fact only a minority are OK with arty or like it. If arty was hated by a small minority we wouldn't have a topic pinned to the top of the forum to discuss arty.



SaintMaddenus #13 Posted 12 April 2019 - 10:06 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 36711 battles
  • 2,108
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    03-04-2011

"Everyone hates arty. In fact only a minority are OK with arty or like it."

 

So actually not everyone hates arty then :hiding:


 

I don't agree with OP btw.  



S1dew1nder #14 Posted 12 April 2019 - 10:24 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4508 battles
  • 78
  • Member since:
    07-26-2013

View PostPayMore, on 11 April 2019 - 10:34 AM, said:

WG seems to be positive to implement new stuff into the game like wheeled tanks, swedish/international tanks and tds with their X-mechanic. WG is allso good with nerfing things that a small minority dont like (arty). WG is allso very fond of making corridormaps. Those corredor maps limits the creativity of the players far beyond pressing 2. 

 

What WG should do to fix this, is to introduce minelayers to shut down corridors and mitigate the nerfs to arty and introducion of wheeled tanks. If the where pioneer tanks that could shoot mines into corridors to stop EBRs atc I think a lot of people would be happy.

 

 

lol mine layers with the way team damage works in this game good luck with that one


Edited by S1dew1nder, 12 April 2019 - 10:24 AM.


SaintMaddenus #15 Posted 12 April 2019 - 10:35 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 36711 battles
  • 2,108
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    03-04-2011

View PostS1dew1nder, on 12 April 2019 - 10:24 AM, said:

 

lol mine layers with the way team damage works in this game good luck with that one

 

Seriously yes.  You know it.


 

 

 



ValkyrionX #16 Posted 12 April 2019 - 11:16 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 49505 battles
  • 1,630
  • [S-GUN] S-GUN
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015

View PostPayMore, on 11 April 2019 - 11:34 AM, said:

WG seems to be positive to implement new stuff into the game like wheeled tanks, swedish/international tanks and tds with their X-mechanic. WG is allso good with nerfing things that a small minority dont like (arty). WG is allso very fond of making corridormaps. Those corredor maps limits the creativity of the players far beyond pressing 2. 

 

What WG should do to fix this, is to introduce minelayers to shut down corridors and mitigate the nerfs to arty and introducion of wheeled tanks. If the where pioneer tanks that could shoot mines into corridors to stop EBRs atc I think a lot of people would be happy.

 

if you want the mines in the game I suggest you go and play Crossout

Captain_Kremen0 #17 Posted 12 April 2019 - 12:14 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38257 battles
  • 1,929
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    06-04-2011

View PostKicky92, on 11 April 2019 - 05:17 PM, said:

Can I have flamethrowers to burn the camping bushes instead?

 

Can I have a seed layer to plant more bushes to replace the ones you burnt?

Kicky92 #18 Posted 12 April 2019 - 05:58 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 15331 battles
  • 187
  • [EMRYS] EMRYS
  • Member since:
    04-21-2015

View PostCaptain_Kremen0, on 12 April 2019 - 11:14 AM, said:

 

Can I have a seed layer to plant more bushes to replace the ones you burnt?

 

Yeah, but only if I get a 'Salting' consumable to salt the ground with once every 90 seconds to stop your seeds from growing lol. :trollface: 

You'd also need some serious miracle grow to get a bush to regrow within the space of a single battle lmao.

 



Hechaton #19 Posted 13 April 2019 - 07:06 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 49690 battles
  • 178
  • Member since:
    06-25-2014
How about bridgelayers?

Yakito #20 Posted 14 April 2019 - 10:39 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 19228 battles
  • 1,383
  • Member since:
    05-03-2011

View PostPayMore, on 11 April 2019 - 10:34 AM, said:

WG is allso good with nerfing things that a small minority dont like (arty). 

 

Oh god. Really? You think a minority hates arty? You think of yourself as majority? Then I'll say this - if what WG does annoy you and your arty playing sessions then I sincerely hope they continue with their current development.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users