Jump to content

AT-2, is the grind worthwhile?

Horrible grind Worth it?

  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

spark82 #21 Posted 12 April 2019 - 12:49 PM


  • Player
  • 39517 battles
  • 55
  • Member since:

I don't know what happened to it, I abandoned the tank back when it was nerfed, I was at 85% MoE at that time. A few days ago I took it out for a spin just for laughs, and I got the 3rd mark in that battle. So it must have felt the nerf a bit. Still liked it tho in that battle (was top tier, so why not). Note that I 3 marked the AT8 and the AT15A as well, so I'm likely into these kind of tanks.

Edited by spark82, 12 April 2019 - 12:49 PM.

thestaggy #22 Posted 12 April 2019 - 02:24 PM


  • Player
  • 17160 battles
  • 2,103
  • Member since:

Do you like;


- Slow, inflexible tanks

- Tanks that attract gold spam and arty

- Tanks that have no turrets

crnakoza #23 Posted 13 April 2019 - 08:38 PM


  • Player
  • 63733 battles
  • 2,124
  • Member since:
AT2 was amazing once, haven't really touched it since nerf. The gun is amazing though, you can blow dozens of tiny little holes on enemy tanks. This tank is first and foremost newbie stomper, people who know how to deal with it will laugh at you and make you suffer, those that don't will put a smile on your face. And get used to speed and 'dynamics' of gameplay because the rest of the line plays in the exact same way. AT8 is meh, AT7 is alright (both have atrocious gun angles), then you get to the AT-15 which is okay and considerable improvement, then comes the Tortoise which is like AT-15 but more in every single way and quite nasty after the buff, and finally the Badger which is ridge riding one trick pony weirdo (although it does that one trick rather well).

RaxipIx #24 Posted 14 April 2019 - 09:39 AM


  • Player
  • 36350 battles
  • 1,692
  • Member since:
I hated the line, from all my heart. I did some pretty terrible grindes but the AT line was the worst so far.

mpf1959 #25 Posted 14 April 2019 - 02:31 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 37442 battles
  • 3,079
  • Member since:

Why not find out for yourself? The test server is your friend. ;)

LordMuffin #26 Posted 15 April 2019 - 12:55 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 58084 battles
  • 13,409
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:

View PostBaldrickk, on 11 April 2019 - 01:28 PM, said:

AT2 is great!


Ok, it's slow,  and you might find that boring, and the whole line is like that. 

But it isn't bad. 

I would say AT2 is terrible.


1: It is very slow. 

2: The armour doesn't work since you mostly are buttom tier and thus meet many T6 and T7 tanks.

Many T6 and T7 tanks can just auto-aim and have a good chance of penning it with standard rounds,  and the few that cant do that can just dab the 2 key for easy pen.

T5 tanks can in general dab the 2 key for easy Penetrations.

The armour only works when you meet T4 and T5 tanks that doesn't shoot premium ammo.

But then the armour is retarded because these tanks can't pen you anywhere instead.

Because the armour layout doesn't allow for any interesting use.


The gun though, it is OK. And the only good part about the tank.


11:57 Added after 1 minute

View Postwsatnutter, on 11 April 2019 - 01:43 PM, said:

when they nerfed the commanders hatch it did make it a little not so worthwhile

however I take mine out still so I say its worth it

They didn't nerf the commanders hatch, the actually buffed it.

But they nerfed every other frontal area of the tank. So instead of like 202mm frontal armour with a 100 mm cupola, it got 140mm uniform frontal armour.

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users