Jump to content


Worst T5 Tanks? (Heavy, Medium and Tank Destroyers)

Heavy Tier 5 Worst Powercreeped? Tier5 Medium Tank Destroyer Best

  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

Poll: Worst T5 Tanks (Excluding: Arty and Light) You can pick 2 options in each poll! (86 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

What is the absolute worst tier 5 heavy according to you?

  1. BDR G1 B (22 votes [18.80%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 18.80%

  2. Voted Churchill I (42 votes [35.90%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 35.90%

  3. KV-1 (1 vote [0.85%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 0.85%

  4. KV-1S (3 votes [2.56%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.56%

  5. Voted O-I Experimental (14 votes [11.97%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 11.97%

  6. T1 Heavy (7 votes [5.98%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.98%

  7. VK 30.01 (H) (28 votes [23.93%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 23.93%

What is the absolute worst tier 5 medium according to you?

  1. 25TP (29 votes [23.77%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 23.77%

  2. Crusader (5 votes [4.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.10%

  3. Voted M4 Sherman (1 vote [0.82%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 0.82%

  4. P.43 (4 votes [3.28%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 3.28%

  5. Pz.Kpfw III/IV (7 votes [5.74%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.74%

  6. Pz.Kpfw IV (3 votes [2.46%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.46%

  7. Renault G1 (32 votes [26.23%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 26.23%

  8. Sherman III (1 vote [0.82%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 0.82%

  9. Skoda T24 (7 votes [5.74%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.74%

  10. Voted Strv m/24 (5 votes [4.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.10%

  11. T-34 (2 votes [1.64%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 1.64%

  12. Type 3 Chi-Nu (15 votes [12.30%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 12.30%

  13. Type T-34 (11 votes [9.02%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 9.02%

What is the absolute worst tier 5 tank destroyer according to you?

  1. 60G FT (10 votes [8.26%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 8.26%

  2. Voted Archer (33 votes [27.27%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 27.27%

  3. Voted AT 2 (20 votes [16.53%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 16.53%

  4. Ikv 103 (29 votes [23.97%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 23.97%

  5. M10 Wolverine (4 votes [3.31%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 3.31%

  6. Pz.Sfl IVc (10 votes [8.26%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 8.26%

  7. S35 CA (9 votes [7.44%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 7.44%

  8. SU-85 (3 votes [2.48%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.48%

  9. T67 (lol as if) (3 votes [2.48%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.48%

Thank you for completing this small "survey", I like to see peoples different opinions and thoughts. Have a nice day and happy tanking, sincerely, your toxic anti arty friend, Mikkiller.

  1. You too! (50 votes [44.25%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 44.25%

  2. Toxic noob (17 votes [15.04%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 15.04%

  3. Uninstall plz (18 votes [15.93%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 15.93%

  4. Have a nice day but.... (15 votes [13.27%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 13.27%

  5. Voted I'm a sealclubber. (13 votes [11.50%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 11.50%

Vote Hide poll

mikkiller #1 Posted 14 April 2019 - 10:27 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 13997 battles
  • 92
  • Member since:
    10-24-2012
As the title says, and I can't wait for the replies. Have fun and happy tanking yes yes.:harp:

barison1 #2 Posted 14 April 2019 - 10:44 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 43589 battles
  • 2,065
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    01-14-2012
t67 is a tier 6 with low hp tho :hiding::trollface:

mikkiller #3 Posted 14 April 2019 - 10:47 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 13997 battles
  • 92
  • Member since:
    10-24-2012

View Postbarison1, on 14 April 2019 - 10:44 PM, said:

t67 is a tier 6 with low hp tho :hiding::trollface:

 

or a E25 with a turret... or just a tier VII with a V gun penetration but still able to wreck VIIs

AvengerOrion #4 Posted 14 April 2019 - 11:20 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27635 battles
  • 1,333
  • Member since:
    12-21-2013

Outside of the IKV which I just hate with a passion I'm missing an option.

 

[X] WTF did the OP smoke to come up with these tanks as worst tier 5?

 

Edit: And no the Archer is not a bad tank, it is the unusual playstyle that does players the head in.


Edited by AvengerOrion, 14 April 2019 - 11:23 PM.


mikkiller #5 Posted 14 April 2019 - 11:29 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 13997 battles
  • 92
  • Member since:
    10-24-2012

View PostAvengerOrion, on 14 April 2019 - 11:20 PM, said:

Outside of the IKV which I just hate with a passion I'm missing an option.

 

[X] WTF did the OP smoke to come up with these tanks as worst tier 5?

 

Edit: And no the Archer is not a bad tank, it is the unusual playstyle that does players the head in.

 

Not sure what you mean by "OP smoke" but, the Archer indeed just has a different playstyle. It's "okay", just not the usual TD.

breeeze #6 Posted 14 April 2019 - 11:55 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 37263 battles
  • 642
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    03-11-2014

Churchill I - going 25 with no armor and -4 gun depression, lol

G1 R - literally a crapM4/Pz IV H, apparently WG thinks shell velocity alone can offset every other stat being much worse

Archer - the Ikv at least is funky and fast, the Archer is just plain bad. Yes I know, blah blah different playstyle because it goes backwards, but from experience theres nothing redeeming, it still only goes 32 with heavy tank acceleration and has to aim for 3 decades after turning, literally useless outside of sitting stationary in a bush.

 



mikkiller #7 Posted 14 April 2019 - 11:56 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 13997 battles
  • 92
  • Member since:
    10-24-2012

View Postbreeeze, on 14 April 2019 - 11:55 PM, said:

Churchill I - going 25 with no armor and -4 gun depression, lol

G1 R - literally a crapM4/Pz IV H, apparently WG thinks shell velocity alone can offset every other stat being much worse

Archer - the Ikv at least is funky and fast, the Archer is just plain bad. Yes I know, blah blah different playstyle because it goes backwards, but from experience theres nothing redeeming, it still only goes 32 with heavy tank acceleration and has to aim for 3 decades after turning, literally useless outside of sitting stationary in a bush.

 

 

Maybe it's just built to be a bush?? idk lol

BravelyRanAway #8 Posted 15 April 2019 - 12:07 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 24334 battles
  • 11,835
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

Guess what I voted......



FluffyRedFox #9 Posted 15 April 2019 - 12:24 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 25286 battles
  • 9,138
  • [FLOOF] FLOOF
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012

My choices -

VK H - Good gun on a handicapped platform, having a flat 50mm hull at t5 is infuriating as derp guns have some chance of going through you with HE.

G1 - Awful, large and clunky platform with a sh*t selection of guns with no mobility.

Chi-Nu - Fairly alright gun with a paper platform that lacks an engine.

AT-2 - No mobility, dependent on armour in a HE-spam environment that becomes utterly useless when uptiered with 2 awful guns to chose from.

SU-85 - Arty levels of view range with no HP, and a gun that felt much more mediocre than it seemed.



Bracciano_gatto #10 Posted 15 April 2019 - 12:27 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 2916 battles
  • 410
  • Member since:
    09-07-2018

The Churchill is an armored mobile 57mm machinegun platform.

 

It can be awesome !



mikkiller #11 Posted 15 April 2019 - 01:10 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 13997 battles
  • 92
  • Member since:
    10-24-2012

View PostFluffyRedFox, on 15 April 2019 - 12:24 AM, said:

My choices -

VK H - Good gun on a handicapped platform, having a flat 50mm hull at t5 is infuriating as derp guns have some chance of going through you with HE.

G1 - Awful, large and clunky platform with a sh*t selection of guns with no mobility.

Chi-Nu - Fairly alright gun with a paper platform that lacks an engine.

AT-2 - No mobility, dependent on armour in a HE-spam environment that becomes utterly useless when uptiered with 2 awful guns to chose from.

SU-85 - Arty levels of view range with no HP, and a gun that felt much more mediocre than it seemed.

 

G1 is just... Bad at everything lol

I like the SU 85 though, but definitely SU 100 above like, everything about the SU 85



SuedKAT #12 Posted 15 April 2019 - 03:08 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 7,990
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014
Logged in just to vote on the IKV 103, so far I haven't played any tank at any tier that's worse than the IKV.

lnfernaI #13 Posted 15 April 2019 - 05:02 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33938 battles
  • 4,758
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

Block Quote

BDR,Churchill I,25TP,Renault G1,AT 2.

All of them are slow,easy to circle or flank,and have large profiles.

Everything else that has some kind of mobility is good enough. Armor is pretty irrelevant at this tier. If you have armor,it means you are slow,and if you are slow,it means you are food for the big fish in tiers 6 or 7. And if you have neither,then you are screwed. Just like that.

 

Block Quote

T67.

 Good at everything,but turns you into a degenerate after awhile,so I stopped playing it.

 

 

Everything else is fine more-or-less. Can't honestly say VK 30 is a heavy,it's basically a TD disguised as a HT. The same goes for things like Chi-Nu. What matters - these tanks are capable,and actually playable pretty often.



KarmaMint #14 Posted 15 April 2019 - 05:28 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 1945 battles
  • 176
  • Member since:
    12-29-2018
I bet it was the hamster who voted on T67

mikkiller #15 Posted 15 April 2019 - 07:59 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 13997 battles
  • 92
  • Member since:
    10-24-2012

View PostKarmaMint, on 15 April 2019 - 05:28 AM, said:

I bet it was the hamster who voted on T67

 

lol +1 rep

Nishi_Kinuyo #16 Posted 15 April 2019 - 04:57 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 9067 battles
  • 6,260
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

(Type) T-34 and Crusader for worst MTs imo.

I can make just about any medium work at tier 5, except the ones with pop guns like those.



vasilinhorulezz #17 Posted 15 April 2019 - 06:01 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27966 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

Churchill I, probably because is not a proper heavy, especially the gun,

Type T-34, mostly because is a worse T-34, adding the very bad gun depression,

Ikv 103, really need to explain that?



Laatikkomafia #18 Posted 15 April 2019 - 06:11 PM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 23265 battles
  • 5,091
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010

I am actually surprised the amount of votes the VK 30 has.

 

Honestly, I'd take it over the T1 any day of the week. Simply because of the gun.



barison1 #19 Posted 15 April 2019 - 06:13 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 43589 battles
  • 2,065
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    01-14-2012

View PostLaatikkomafia, on 15 April 2019 - 06:11 PM, said:

I am actually surprised the amount of votes the VK 30 has.

 

Honestly, I'd take it over the T1 any day of the week. Simply because of the gun.

 

think most people hate vk just for the platform, gun is pretty decent/good

 

 



DeadLecter #20 Posted 15 April 2019 - 06:14 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32223 battles
  • 1,752
  • Member since:
    05-28-2016

View PostAvengerOrion, on 15 April 2019 - 01:50 AM, said:

Outside of the IKV which I just hate with a passion I'm missing an option.

 

[X] WTF did the OP smoke to come up with these tanks as worst tier 5?

 

Edit: And no the Archer is not a bad tank, it is the unusual playstyle that does players the head in.

 

Maybe Archer is a good tank, but it was one of the shittiest experiences I've ever had in my entire WoT career. That and AT2 are just pure garbage for me.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users