Jump to content


Swedish Heavy Tanks Rebalance

1.5

  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

vuque #1 Posted 26 April 2019 - 01:38 PM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 18105 battles
  • 3,392
  • [YOQ] YOQ
  • Member since:
    08-05-2010

Hello Commanders, 

 

Please leave your feedback on Swedish Heavy Tanks Rebalance for Update1.5, and remember to remain on-topic and constructive. 

 

Roll out!



TheNightFox #2 Posted 30 April 2019 - 02:59 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 7120 battles
  • 72
  • [ATMA] ATMA
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014
Looks really good. I hope you won't do any re-re-re-balancing after like 8 months, "when more people have it". Do it fast or forget about it.

Edited by TheNightFox, 30 April 2019 - 03:00 PM.


kaneloon #3 Posted 30 April 2019 - 03:33 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 30021 battles
  • 2,857
  • [FR2DB] FR2DB
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011

I think lots of people already had and liked the emil I and II. For instance those like me who had swedish girls from past Chrismas and don't like ghost tds.

But the kravagn really was unplayable in full X. It is the first tiers X I demoted the crew back on tiers IX.

So any buff as planned (not too good) is really welcome and was needed. Keep it that way !



SlyMeerkat #4 Posted 30 April 2019 - 03:55 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 17738 battles
  • 2,757
  • [FILO] FILO
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
Nice

LowLancer #5 Posted 01 May 2019 - 11:56 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 39924 battles
  • 41
  • [-LOW-] -LOW-
  • Member since:
    04-11-2014
Can someone PLEASE tell me why WG nerfed my beloved Emil 1's dispersion?!
The accuracy, aiming time and dispersion already sucked to begin with!
Patch notes:
Emil I

*Increased the dispersion during movement of the Emil Alt 1 suspension by 12%

*Increased the dispersion during movement of the Emil Alt 2 suspension by 4%

Increased the dispersion on hull traverse of the Emil Alt 1 suspension by 12%

*Increased the dispersion on hull traverse of the Emil Alt 2 suspension by 4%

WG please tell me, why?!

DangerMouse #6 Posted 01 May 2019 - 01:33 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 28359 battles
  • 1,028
  • [FLOG] FLOG
  • Member since:
    10-28-2010

View PostLowLancer, on 01 May 2019 - 10:56 AM, said:

Can someone PLEASE tell me why WG nerfed my beloved Emil 1's dispersion?!
The accuracy, aiming time and dispersion already sucked to begin with!
Patch notes:
Emil I

*Increased the dispersion during movement of the Emil Alt 1 suspension by 12%

*Increased the dispersion during movement of the Emil Alt 2 suspension by 4%

Increased the dispersion on hull traverse of the Emil Alt 1 suspension by 12%

*Increased the dispersion on hull traverse of the Emil Alt 2 suspension by 4%

WG please tell me, why?!

 

Apparently a player on the RU server had his Defender killed by one once.

NotRichou #7 Posted 02 May 2019 - 02:37 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6325 battles
  • 43
  • [PZF42] PZF42
  • Member since:
    01-18-2018

was it really necessary to NERF the EMil 1 ? 

its so [edited]slooooooooooow now 



TacPenguin #8 Posted 02 May 2019 - 04:00 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44232 battles
  • 1,606
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

Wargamming congratulations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

You have made a bad tank the EMIL 1 now utterly crap.

 

I did not believe it possible but you have

 

3 shots in mag so you cant execute a full HP  a enemy that make a mistake.  Why remove number 4    ??????????????

 

The gun handling is even worse.  Why did you think this was a good idea. Why???????????

 

IT is now an utter slug and climbs hill like a Maus or Type super heavy Why?????????????????????????????????????

 

Engine power WTF??? even less.  Why????????????????????
 

Just played stepps map in my fully upgraded Emil 1 and over regular ground on the Flat I was slowly over taken by a Ferdinand as I went to right ridge.

 

This tank was bad and is now even worse.

 

Fire your balance department!!!!!!!

 

Fire your supertesters!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Listen to the feedback from community? Top Clan Players and community contributors.

 

 

TacP

 

 

PS

 

I see the much needed rebalance to OBJ 430/430u cancelled due to moaning by RU Server

 

 

WArgamming why not split the EU away from RU servers?

 

Buff all soviet super tanks so RU servers can be happy and then do a proper fair rebalance for the EU / NA/Sea  where there is no maniacal demand for all things soviet to be OP and to hell with fair gamming.


Edited by TacPenguin, 02 May 2019 - 04:03 PM.


LowLancer #9 Posted 02 May 2019 - 04:16 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 39924 battles
  • 41
  • [-LOW-] -LOW-
  • Member since:
    04-11-2014

View PostDangerMouse, on 01 May 2019 - 12:33 PM, said:

 

Apparently a player on the RU server had his Defender killed by one once.

That's the only logical explanation! XD

15:22 Added after 5 minutes
@TacPinguin I know right? WHY NERF EMIL 1?!? I don't think I have read any reason for the nerf anywhere either... WG just tell us why you think the Emil 1 needed these changes. I kind of understand you want it to behave like the Kranvagn and Emil 2, but at tier Vlll. But that does not justify the mobility and gun handling nerfs, right?

NotRichou #10 Posted 02 May 2019 - 04:25 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6325 battles
  • 43
  • [PZF42] PZF42
  • Member since:
    01-18-2018

after playing a few matches in the Emil i have to say WHAT THE [edited]did the EMil do to deserve this 

 

first of all i like the changed top gun and the better dpm on stock 

makes it alot more competitive but HOLY [edited]that thing is so slow now what the [edited] 

a VK 100 feels more mobile and that at least gets solid armor and doesnt get missed by arty for 400 dmg every shot 

 

you killed the Emil and you have the guts to pretend its a buff 



Csokiboci #11 Posted 02 May 2019 - 06:55 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 40581 battles
  • 23
  • [6HPH] 6HPH
  • Member since:
    03-15-2014
Emil 2 feels slower than before wtf? It's literally a freaking snail.

Afrika_Korps #12 Posted 02 May 2019 - 07:59 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 26456 battles
  • 12
  • Member since:
    05-08-2011

*Edit


Edited by xP4_warrior, 07 May 2019 - 03:10 PM.
*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to insults against Wargaming.


Coolf #13 Posted 02 May 2019 - 10:44 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 41629 battles
  • 1
  • [PGT] PGT
  • Member since:
    12-22-2011
Emil 1 is a *edit. It so bad that it made me post on the forum for the first time in 41k battles. People that posted earlier exhausted the subject why ist's so bad.

Edited by xP4_warrior, 07 May 2019 - 03:14 PM.
*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


KattRackan #14 Posted 03 May 2019 - 07:36 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11916 battles
  • 15
  • Member since:
    10-14-2016

Thank you for this fine rebalance of The kranvagn.

I liked it from The first beginning thanks to its looks and diffrences, and now it stands out even more thanks to theese tweaks. Love it!

So boring when so many tanks are so alike in playstyle, imo wg are in right direction with creating more diversity to the tanks. 


Edited by KattRackan, 03 May 2019 - 07:37 AM.


LowLancer #15 Posted 03 May 2019 - 07:44 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 39924 battles
  • 41
  • [-LOW-] -LOW-
  • Member since:
    04-11-2014

View PostKattRackan, on 03 May 2019 - 06:36 AM, said:

Thank you for this fine rebalance of The kranvagn.

I liked it from The first beginning thanks to its looks and diffrences, and now it stands out even more thanks to theese tweaks. Love it!

So boring when so many tanks are so alike in playstyle, imo wg are in right direction with creating more diversity to the tanks. 

With Kranvagn they did good things, but the Emil 1 didn't deserve what it got.



KattRackan #16 Posted 03 May 2019 - 09:45 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11916 battles
  • 15
  • Member since:
    10-14-2016

View PostLowLancer, on 03 May 2019 - 07:44 AM, said:

With Kranvagn they did good things, but the Emil 1 didn't deserve what it got.

 

Havent played Emil 1 since i grinded thru it, the tank itself was mediocre, almost bad imo so yea, it dont deserve getting worse.

Kalonianhydra #17 Posted 03 May 2019 - 12:39 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 28599 battles
  • 69
  • Member since:
    07-19-2013
Emil I *edit, it was bad before but now it's rely bad. The aim time is about a year and the accuracy is *edit, and on top of that you nerfed the mobility so now it's worse than a TS-5

Thanks for this, when are you going to get something right.

Edited by xP4_warrior, 07 May 2019 - 03:15 PM.
*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


Rati_Festa #18 Posted 03 May 2019 - 12:43 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 47490 battles
  • 2,140
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    02-10-2012

Bad point - Agreed tried my Emil which wasn't anywhere near the best t8 heavy and it's now a lot weaker. It feels like the crew are constantly stunned... bad decision by WG.

 

Good point - Kranvagn is now useable though and fun to play. Just glad I don't have to grind the Emil again :)



TacPenguin #19 Posted 03 May 2019 - 04:23 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44232 battles
  • 1,606
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

After further play this tank is indeed utter garbage.

 

It has 217 pen apparently but this coupled with 3 second ?? aim time means lots of bounce at any range over 5 m.  I'm currently penning about 50% shots and those that hit seem magnetically drawn to armor for bounce.

 

So out of every 3 shots 1.5 are bounce just pathetic really

 

Edit

I run Gun lay drive, Vert stab,  BIA, Snap Shot, Smooth ride and it is still utterly slow crap to aim.

 

Maybe WG want me to pay for food or Use directives or  enhanced equipment to use up bonds?

 

well not happening nope

 

TCP

 

 

 


Edited by TacPenguin, 03 May 2019 - 05:24 PM.


S3uch3nvog3l #20 Posted 03 May 2019 - 05:06 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24117 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    06-01-2015

Since the last Patch my Emil 1just runs 25 km/h max 28 and not the 50 km/h what he should do outta Tankstats, some1 else have same Problem ?

Tank is complete destroyed, again a sign that WG programmers are not able to find a good balance, overpowered or underpower, middle way seems to be not possible...

Outta my View Game is going to be more and more destroyed, and don`t wonder if people take 10 steps back and join other games


Edited by S3uch3nvog3l, 03 May 2019 - 06:46 PM.






Also tagged with 1.5

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users