Jump to content


What other stats should WG implement?

stats

  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

fisco77 #1 Posted 05 May 2019 - 12:56 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 74579 battles
  • 500
  • Member since:
    07-09-2012

Obviously WG has many many stats available too look at, but we aren't allowed to see them. There used to be a 'Trees knocked down' stat which i think WG removed, i quite liked that...I would also add 'Crashed' and 'Drowned' for us to see...

 

And although i know it will never happen, the big three: 'Percent of standard ammo used', 'Percent of secondary ammo used', 'Percent of special ammo used'. For each tank! This would make the stats we have now (mainly WR and WN8), when compared to the percentages of ammo types used, actually meaningful. And playing with more 'standard' than 'special' ammo would become a sign of skill and prestige, like hardcore mode. Your opinion? And which ones would you add?

                              

                             



Gruff_ #2 Posted 05 May 2019 - 02:26 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18562 battles
  • 427
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-22-2011

Toxicity Absorbed / Spewed

Good sportsmanship

Hours wasted "played"



wEight_Tanker #3 Posted 05 May 2019 - 03:36 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9815 battles
  • 1,084
  • [VI90M] VI90M
  • Member since:
    11-13-2016
Hamsters fed on the forums.

Homer_J #4 Posted 05 May 2019 - 07:54 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 31398 battles
  • 34,135
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postfisco77, on 05 May 2019 - 12:56 AM, said:

 'Percent of special ammo used'.      

 

Yes.  Something for Dingers to come top of the rankings for! :izmena:

 

Seriously, they should just get rid of stats, they are only used for willy waving and attempting to discredit other people's opinions.

 

View PostwEight_Tanker, on 05 May 2019 - 03:36 AM, said:

Hamsters fed on the forums.

 

Posts like by qpranger would be a good stat to see under someone's avatar.  Much more relevant than battle count. :great:

Tyburn #5 Posted 05 May 2019 - 08:03 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12905 battles
  • 227
  • Member since:
    03-19-2012
Without stats this game would be nothing. More please.

Bordhaw #6 Posted 05 May 2019 - 08:48 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 13572 battles
  • 3,849
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View Postfisco77, on 04 May 2019 - 11:56 PM, said:

Obviously WG has many many stats available too look at, but we aren't allowed to see them. There used to be a 'Trees knocked down' stat which i think WG removed, i quite liked that...I would also add 'Crashed' and 'Drowned' for us to see...

 

And although i know it will never happen, the big three: 'Percent of standard ammo used', 'Percent of secondary ammo used', 'Percent of special ammo used'. For each tank! This would make the stats we have now (mainly WR and WN8), when compared to the percentages of ammo types used, actually meaningful. And playing with more 'standard' than 'special' ammo would become a sign of skill and prestige, like hardcore mode. Your opinion? And which ones would you add?

                              

                             

 

Or you could, you know, just play the game...

shikaka9 #7 Posted 05 May 2019 - 08:50 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 67191 battles
  • 466
  • [SWM] SWM
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013
World of Stats

shishx_the_animal #8 Posted 05 May 2019 - 08:54 AM

    Colonel

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 32025 battles
  • 3,909
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    04-06-2013
Trees broken.

Gruff_ #9 Posted 05 May 2019 - 08:57 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18562 battles
  • 427
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-22-2011

View Postshishx_the_animal, on 05 May 2019 - 07:54 AM, said:

Trees broken.

 

You just broke 60k trees cut you bark nibbling beaver http://wotinfo.net/en/efficiency?server=EU&playername=shishx_the_animal+

WoT_RU_Doing #10 Posted 05 May 2019 - 09:39 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 54264 battles
  • 2,848
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    07-20-2013

View PostGruff_, on 05 May 2019 - 07:57 AM, said:

 

You just broke 60k trees cut you bark nibbling beaver http://wotinfo.net/en/efficiency?server=EU&playername=shishx_the_animal+

 

I see the same number....looks like it maybe stopped counting after 60001

Gruff_ #11 Posted 05 May 2019 - 09:43 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18562 battles
  • 427
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-22-2011
Ah fair enough I linked as I'd been looking in to my own results last night

Tom_Deekanarry #12 Posted 05 May 2019 - 09:55 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10744 battles
  • 495
  • Member since:
    06-28-2012
Arty whining posts started!

Dorander #13 Posted 05 May 2019 - 10:21 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 20349 battles
  • 4,749
  • Member since:
    05-07-2012
Amount of shots hit at full speed, percentage of time spent in bushes, average range of engagement, time per battle spent without driving, percentage of battle time spent alive... :harp:

Jumping_Turtle #14 Posted 05 May 2019 - 10:35 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 65864 battles
  • 6,266
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013

The more stats the better. I love stats.

 

The ones that come to mind :

 

The amount of games played in platoon vs solo

How players are doing on the personal missions. Just show how many got the Stugg/T28HTC, T55A, Obj. 260/Excaliber/Chimera/Obj. 273

Show a percentage on how players are doing with the grinds. Like I am on about 90% done with all grinds

Total distance travelled.

 


Edited by Jumping_Turtle, 05 May 2019 - 10:40 AM.


Dorander #15 Posted 05 May 2019 - 10:38 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 20349 battles
  • 4,749
  • Member since:
    05-07-2012
Ooooh, number of times your vehicle completely lost contact with the ground. Let's see who the real acrobats are!

SlyMeerkat #16 Posted 05 May 2019 - 10:39 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 17737 battles
  • 2,755
  • [FILO] FILO
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
I always thought it was be interesting if they added a stat that counts how many times you got 3rd, 2nd, 1st and Ace Tanker in each individual tank, something minor but one i have always liked to know as well as how long played?

WoT_RU_Doing #17 Posted 05 May 2019 - 10:43 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 54264 battles
  • 2,848
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    07-20-2013

View PostSlyMeerkat, on 05 May 2019 - 09:39 AM, said:

I always thought it was be interesting if they added a stat that counts how many times you got 3rd, 2nd, 1st and Ace Tanker in each individual tank, something minor but one i have always liked to know as well as how long played?

 

I'd have thought that would be REALLY useful since the introduction of the Campaign 2.0 missions.....knowing which vehicles you most often get Ace's in would help with players' selections when they do the Excalibur Union-15 and Alliance-15 missions.

AXIS_OF_RESISTANCE #18 Posted 05 May 2019 - 11:08 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 2177 battles
  • 257
  • [Y-] Y-
  • Member since:
    12-21-2017

Recent 100 battles dpg could be nice because fixing a dpg on a tank you played bad with more than 500 battles could take forever .



HassenderZerhacker #19 Posted 05 May 2019 - 11:50 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 29144 battles
  • 2,900
  • [1DPG] 1DPG
  • Member since:
    09-09-2015

battles played in a platoon, overall and also per tank

 

percentage of "special" ammo fired, overall and per tank


Edited by HassenderZerhacker, 05 May 2019 - 11:51 AM.


Laatikkomafia #20 Posted 05 May 2019 - 12:37 PM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 23076 battles
  • 4,949
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010
Times hit by allies.





Also tagged with stats

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users