Jump to content


T-34 Shielded: the Hero of Kursk


  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

BSHDBCG #21 Posted 28 May 2019 - 12:26 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 6212 battles
  • 1,035
  • Member since:
    04-20-2015

View PostTungstenHitman, on 28 May 2019 - 10:31 AM, said:

 

Fire Bulge? that sounds rude. Anyway, buldges not withstanding, this is an entirely different camo set? I was under the impression that there was the turret camo and the hull camo, that I was always missing the hull camo, maybe not the case?

 

Both are styles, so there is that.

TheCemetery #22 Posted 28 May 2019 - 12:59 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 11228 battles
  • 290
  • Member since:
    01-30-2011

View PostTungstenHitman, on 28 May 2019 - 08:43 AM, said:

 

What was that final stage camo? I got the first stage camo but for the life of me I can't see what's missing?

 

 

https://i.imgur.com/U6IsRcn.jpg



TungstenHitman #23 Posted 28 May 2019 - 02:05 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 31575 battles
  • 6,254
  • [B_M_G] B_M_G
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016
Ok thanks guys, so I'm not missing some hull camo after all then, it's just supposed to be that bare and "straight out the factory door" sort of look, which is actually a cool and more realistic look for that soviet mass production sort of ethos during the war. Some tanks are too fancy and pretty, so a bare rugged looking tank with a slosh of base color and rough welding and grinding on it is probably a better look than anything else.

parim1331 #24 Posted 28 May 2019 - 04:40 PM

    Polish Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 7737 battles
  • 1,574
  • Member since:
    05-11-2012

View PostSimona2k, on 28 May 2019 - 09:08 AM, said:

got it

 

nice

WoT_RU_Doing #25 Posted 28 May 2019 - 05:44 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 59586 battles
  • 3,388
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    07-20-2013

View PostTungstenHitman, on 28 May 2019 - 01:05 PM, said:

Ok thanks guys, so I'm not missing some hull camo after all then, it's just supposed to be that bare and "straight out the factory door" sort of look, which is actually a cool and more realistic look for that soviet mass production sort of ethos during the war. Some tanks are too fancy and pretty, so a bare rugged looking tank with a slosh of base color and rough welding and grinding on it is probably a better look than anything else.

 

Sounds like you have the correct camo style...it should look like this:

shot_1944.jpg

And the Fire Bulge one from the marathon for anyone who doesn't like external links...

shot_1943.jpg


 

 



hipper101 #26 Posted 28 May 2019 - 06:57 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 19329 battles
  • 165
  • [JOD] JOD
  • Member since:
    11-21-2017
but but but WG said they would NEVER EVER sell it 

WoT_RU_Doing #27 Posted 28 May 2019 - 07:03 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 59586 battles
  • 3,388
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    07-20-2013

View Posthipper101, on 28 May 2019 - 05:57 PM, said:

but but but WG said they would NEVER EVER sell it

 

I don't recall WG saying that.

 

What I find more interesting is the fact that I have two sets of the Hero of Kursk style in my depot, applicable only to the T-34S, yet you can only have one of them in the garage....good job WG.



Bordhaw #28 Posted 28 May 2019 - 08:31 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 15576 battles
  • 5,322
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostNBG45, on 28 May 2019 - 08:32 AM, said:

It's a decent tank,none the less. Plus it comes from an event long ago,so those players that missed it can get this tank now.

I was more interested in the camo that was awarded in the final stage. Maybe we get to see those events again in the future ?

 



NL_The_Lion #29 Posted 28 May 2019 - 09:45 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 8487 battles
  • 31
  • [BURP] BURP
  • Member since:
    01-07-2017
Better buy T34-85M it is better shielded

WoT_RU_Doing #30 Posted 28 May 2019 - 09:47 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 59586 battles
  • 3,388
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    07-20-2013

View PostNL_The_Lion, on 28 May 2019 - 08:45 PM, said:

Better buy T34-85M it is better shielded

 

-85M is rubbish if you want a tier 5.

KillingJoker #31 Posted 29 May 2019 - 01:55 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 41714 battles
  • 1,806
  • Member since:
    09-07-2015

 

If i didn't got the tank, i would get it just because i loved this movie 



Kothaar #32 Posted 29 May 2019 - 06:31 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 63558 battles
  • 509
  • [IGNOR] IGNOR
  • Member since:
    01-05-2011

View PostWoT_RU_Doing, on 28 May 2019 - 09:47 PM, said:

 

-85M is rubbish if you want a tier 5.

 

Probably the best tank of its tier.

laceleste #33 Posted 29 May 2019 - 05:20 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 49054 battles
  • 602
  • Member since:
    03-02-2013

 

Got it this time round, wanted one from the very outset. Nice :)



WoT_RU_Doing #34 Posted 29 May 2019 - 05:28 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 59586 battles
  • 3,388
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    07-20-2013

View PostKothaar, on 29 May 2019 - 05:31 AM, said:

 

Probably the best tank of its tier.

 

Maybe, but as I say, if you want a tier 5 there's no point buying a tier 6

Edited by WoT_RU_Doing, 29 May 2019 - 05:28 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users