Jump to content


Rankeds should be 7 vs 7 or 5 vs 5


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

PabloGee #1 Posted 30 May 2019 - 12:13 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 32525 battles
  • 178
  • Member since:
    01-15-2014

Hey,

15 vs 15 is not a ranked - its another grind fest and credits sinker.

 

Rankeds shoud be playable 24 h/7 in for ex. 7 vs 7 mode - there skill would matter. - there w should be seasons, leagues, and most important - ANTY CHEAT !  

WOWs have amazing ranked system but for WOT seems its too hard to achieve after 10 years. Today's system where you have to first play 4 divisions for being placed is just a  joke xD It like - spend your 3 weeks 6 h/ day and you will be placed somewhere. What a nonsense 

In meantime player base is lowest in history ... ez Clap 

I think a lot of players want to compete but seems Wargmiang has only one idea : GRIND GRIND 



Balc0ra #2 Posted 30 May 2019 - 12:38 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 72848 battles
  • 20,703
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

For 7 vs 7 on our maps, you need communication and team work. Not just run solo, and fall back to farm damage to save your rank later. So I doubt it would have the desired effect. And then what? The top 3 on the team gets moved up on a win and the last place goes down? Even if they all worked as a team? And even if the ranked system was "faster" don't mean you will get up faster when everyone else does too tbh. Then again it might have any effect as not many play ranked as is. And it's not the grind that's the issue. The most common complaint is still... that WG thought tier X is the best tier for it.

 

And if you feel everyone is cheating. Then why play at all? As going by half the topics about it so far. Most seems to think there are still cheats to show your unspotted location at all times, and no-clip cheat on shells so they can hit behind cover and terrain. Or the 0.01 dispersion cheat on the move, or a mod that does 100% ammo rack damage on each hit I've yet to find. So I'm still amazed that players spots them more then WG do. As the few mods most use are not easy to prove from your aspect. As now if you guess right on a 50/50 on where the unspotted enemy went. You use a map destruction mod. Or if you hit 2 out of 10 shots or even dare to snap something. You cheat. So, even if they had an anti-cheat. Would you notice any difference? 



Sylvansight #3 Posted 30 May 2019 - 01:11 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 33685 battles
  • 516
  • [YFWM] YFWM
  • Member since:
    01-01-2013
24/7 would not encourage T-22 style cheating at all :hiding:

dex_1950 #4 Posted 30 May 2019 - 01:48 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35566 battles
  • 527
  • [N1GER] N1GER
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014
or 1vs1

tajj7 #5 Posted 30 May 2019 - 01:51 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 28175 battles
  • 16,226
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

10 v 10 I think would be a better number. Some maps would be a bit empty with literally less than 50% of the normal tanks. 

 

But less players I think would make it less brawl centric and more skill based, you might see more variety as well in tank choices. 

 

IIRC ranked in WOWs is 7v7, with the normal game 12 v 12, but I think the maps are a little smaller. 



filipriec #6 Posted 14 June 2019 - 12:43 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11166 battles
  • 47
  • [DAG0D] DAG0D
  • Member since:
    06-04-2013

View PostBalc0ra, on 30 May 2019 - 11:38 AM, said:

For 7 vs 7 on our maps, you need communication and team work. Not just run solo, and fall back to farm damage to save your rank later. So I doubt it would have the desired effect. And then what? The top 3 on the team gets moved up on a win and the last place goes down? Even if they all worked as a team? And even if the ranked system was "faster" don't mean you will get up faster when everyone else does too tbh. Then again it might have any effect as not many play ranked as is. And it's not the grind that's the issue. The most common complaint is still... that WG thought tier X is the best tier for it.

 

 

 

how about chevron receiving only the winners? i mean in csgo it works, teams can communicate, why it cant be here like that? i dont mind even weaker players to join, ill cooperate with them, and cos of that ill be winning the games so my rank will be higher and playing with better players who are doing the same as me. Isnt the point of this game to win? 

eldrak #7 Posted 14 June 2019 - 02:07 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 51219 battles
  • 1,354
  • [GR-W] GR-W
  • Member since:
    01-27-2011

View Postfilipriec, on 14 June 2019 - 11:43 AM, said:

 

how about chevron receiving only the winners? i mean in csgo it works, teams can communicate, why it cant be here like that? i dont mind even weaker players to join, ill cooperate with them, and cos of that ill be winning the games so my rank will be higher and playing with better players who are doing the same as me. Isnt the point of this game to win? 

 

Imagine people being kicked for not working with the team or for not using coms.

Imagine them being replaced by bots that you could control after you die

Imagine people getting automatic bans for teamdamage, suicides or leaving battle



r00barb #8 Posted 14 June 2019 - 02:13 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 27533 battles
  • 11,106
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View Postdex_1950, on 30 May 2019 - 12:48 PM, said:

or 1vs1

 

This, on Mittengard with tier 1 tanks so that no one has a premium/reward advantage. And every battle has to begin with the traditional mating call of the greater clueless halfwit, "1v1 me bro, 1v1 me". :great:

shikaka9 #9 Posted 14 June 2019 - 02:55 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 70629 battles
  • 958
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013
i vote for 1 vs 1, then you win/loose all by yourself ... and WR will be real :)

Edited by shikaka9, 14 June 2019 - 02:55 PM.


r00barb #10 Posted 14 June 2019 - 03:10 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 27533 battles
  • 11,106
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View Postshikaka9, on 14 June 2019 - 01:55 PM, said:

... and WR will be real :)

 



shikaka9 #11 Posted 14 June 2019 - 03:20 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 70629 battles
  • 958
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013

View Postr00barb, on 14 June 2019 - 02:10 PM, said:

 

still not real? damit .. is it possible somehow on this game?

:confused:



r00barb #12 Posted 14 June 2019 - 04:05 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 27533 battles
  • 11,106
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View Postshikaka9, on 14 June 2019 - 02:20 PM, said:

still not real? damit .. is it possible somehow on this game?

:confused:

 

Apologies, I was making a reference to the repeated claims seen on the forum that WR is rigged, particularly in ranked battles. You could simplify it as much as you want but the tinfoilers would still proclaim rigged battles and RNG are to blame because it's never their fault when they lose. 

 

:)






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users