Jump to content


No-so ranked battles


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

Condr #1 Posted 08 June 2019 - 01:45 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 40790 battles
  • 10
  • [TNAC] TNAC
  • Member since:
    12-20-2011

Probably multiple topics were already posted, but still.

Expectation of ranked battles was one of very few things that kept me in this game and reason I was buying stuff like premium. Well, was, as what we received was just an insult.

 

What WG gave us this time is not ranked. It's same useless random with rewards. I did not seen any battle with more them 3 people at same rank per team. That is not ranked battle.

 

You want to do ranked battles in TEAM GAME? Then make team matter. Losing team lose chevrons (yes, all of them). Winning team gain them. Top performers may gain more to boost overall progression.

Anyone saying it's not fair - IT IS. It's a team game and if you want to try to cure all crapthat is currently happening in this random with awards - you need to give one and only motivation for team to win. 

 

 



Toon_lass #2 Posted 08 June 2019 - 02:39 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 463 battles
  • 4
  • Member since:
    04-21-2019
Making teams equal by people/league is one reasonably fair way to provide equal teams whilst keeping the wait times manageable is it not?

Rattogigi #3 Posted 09 June 2019 - 01:16 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 58805 battles
  • 96
  • Member since:
    01-27-2011

Ranked is not more TEAM is just i try get chevrons, losing or winning i play safe and i hope

Mean all go one side of map, some camps trying survive more and get some kill for more exp.

Spamming premium ammo and hope thats ranked; not a skill game mode.


Edited by Rattogigi, 09 June 2019 - 01:16 AM.


Ricky_Rolls #4 Posted 09 June 2019 - 09:57 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 72177 battles
  • 1,782
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    11-10-2010
Peoples finally came to realize that ranked is nothing but a useless farm fest where anyone with a broken reward tank can reach top ranks? How shocking...

shikaka9 #5 Posted 09 June 2019 - 10:14 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 70675 battles
  • 970
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013
team? in wot? kids dont need teamwork, they just need forward'n'shoot

demon_tank #6 Posted 09 June 2019 - 12:23 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26785 battles
  • 1,561
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostRicky_Rolls, on 09 June 2019 - 08:57 AM, said:

Peoples finally came to realize that ranked is nothing but a useless farm fest where anyone with a broken reward tank can reach top ranks? How shocking...

 

SC , IS7 , 430U , PROGETTO 65 , 268-4.

 

Much rewards tanks much wow.

 

In previous Ranked Battles seasons players with 1200-1500 wn8 managed to climb as high as unicums and super unicums with the trusty IS7 or the slooooow SC.



r00barb #7 Posted 09 June 2019 - 01:05 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 27533 battles
  • 11,108
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostCondr, on 08 June 2019 - 12:45 PM, said:

You want to do ranked battles in TEAM GAME? Then make team matter. Losing team lose chevrons (yes, all of them). Winning team gain them. Top performers may gain more to boost overall progression.

 

IIRC that's how it was in the first season or two and "everyone" complained that it wasn't fair that they'd lose a chevron if their team was rubbish but they had a good battle personally.



Ricky_Rolls #8 Posted 09 June 2019 - 01:27 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 72177 battles
  • 1,782
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    11-10-2010

View Postdemon_tank, on 09 June 2019 - 12:23 PM, said:

 

SC , IS7 , 430U , PROGETTO 65 , 268-4.

 

Much rewards tanks much wow.

 

In previous Ranked Battles seasons players with 1200-1500 wn8 managed to climb as high as unicums and super unicums with the trusty IS7 or the slooooow SC.

 

I guess u're just not playing the same ranked.

demon_tank #9 Posted 09 June 2019 - 01:35 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26785 battles
  • 1,561
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostRicky_Rolls, on 09 June 2019 - 12:27 PM, said:

 

I guess u're just not playing the same ranked.

 

We do. You just missed the memo of standards tanks that are as good as the cw/reward tanks OR can do the same job.

 

You also missed the memo of 30k players who own the 907 and another 31k who own the 260 by now.

 

So you re presumably crying about 2 tanks here. The 279 and the Chieftain. And noone is stopping players to get one of them.

 

Crying about ONE AND A HALF tanks when there are at least 9 more that everybody has than can do the same job is a bit odd dont you think ?

 

Lets count them together.

 

260 , 907 , 5A , 277 , IS7 , SC , 430U , PROGETTO 65 , 268-4.


Edited by demon_tank, 09 June 2019 - 01:36 PM.


Ricky_Rolls #10 Posted 09 June 2019 - 08:01 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 72177 battles
  • 1,782
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    11-10-2010

View Postdemon_tank, on 09 June 2019 - 01:35 PM, said:

 

We do. You just missed the memo of standards tanks that are as good as the cw/reward tanks OR can do the same job.

 

You also missed the memo of 30k players who own the 907 and another 31k who own the 260 by now.

 

So you re presumably crying about 2 tanks here. The 279 and the Chieftain. And noone is stopping players to get one of them.

 

Crying about ONE AND A HALF tanks when there are at least 9 more that everybody has than can do the same job is a bit odd dont you think ?

 

Lets count them together.

 

260 , 907 , 5A , 277 , IS7 , SC , 430U , PROGETTO 65 , 268-4.

 

"As good as the reward tanks" LMFAO. You're just living on another planet.

LordMuffin #11 Posted 09 June 2019 - 10:16 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 52674 battles
  • 13,342
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View Postshikaka9, on 09 June 2019 - 10:14 AM, said:

team? in wot? kids dont need teamwork, they just need forward'n'shoot

You know that most players you seeing this game are between 25 and 45 years old.

 

So, these are the persons that you refer to.

21:18 Added after 2 minutes

View Postdemon_tank, on 09 June 2019 - 01:35 PM, said:

 

We do. You just missed the memo of standards tanks that are as good as the cw/reward tanks OR can do the same job.

 

You also missed the memo of 30k players who own the 907 and another 31k who own the 260 by now.

 

So you re presumably crying about 2 tanks here. The 279 and the Chieftain. And noone is stopping players to get one of them.

 

Crying about ONE AND A HALF tanks when there are at least 9 more that everybody has than can do the same job is a bit odd dont you think ?

 

Lets count them together.

 

260 , 907 , 5A , 277 , IS7 , SC , 430U , PROGETTO 65 , 268-4.

The Chieftain is just an upgrade of all the tanks you mentioned. 

 

I am not playing ranked for the sole reason it presents the worst balanced tier in game with the most boring gameplay in game. 

I would rather play ranked in T1 tanks.

 

T10 is the worst crapintroduced in WoT, and anything going on at T10 is just a meme-fest.


Edited by LordMuffin, 09 June 2019 - 10:20 PM.


the_nebuchadnezzar #12 Posted 09 June 2019 - 11:42 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 54388 battles
  • 1,663
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    08-19-2013
FV/T95 is tier 11.

demon_tank #13 Posted 10 June 2019 - 12:34 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26785 battles
  • 1,561
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostRicky_Rolls, on 09 June 2019 - 07:01 PM, said:

 

"As good as the reward tanks" LMFAO. You're just living on another planet.

 

You re spining it the way you want it which is sad and pathetic.

 

I clearly wrote as good OR can do the same job which is ABSOLUTELY true.

 

430U is on par with any of the cw/reward tanks.

 

907 and 260 everybody has them.  IS7 and SC are OP when hulldown and can do the same job as well.

 

Get your off your horse and stop crying.



Kartoshkaya #14 Posted 10 June 2019 - 12:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 27383 battles
  • 950
  • [HAPY-] HAPY-
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015

View Postdemon_tank, on 10 June 2019 - 12:34 PM, said:

 

You re spining it the way you want it which is sad and pathetic.

 

I clearly wrote as good OR can do the same job which is ABSOLUTELY true.

 

430U is on par with any of the cw/reward tanks.

 

907 and 260 everybody has them.  IS7 and SC are OP when hulldown and can do the same job as well.

 

Get your off your horse and stop crying.

 

Then what's the problem of removing them from ranked?



Strizi #15 Posted 10 June 2019 - 01:06 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 41988 battles
  • 885
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011

View Postdemon_tank, on 10 June 2019 - 12:34 PM, said:

 

You re spining it the way you want it which is sad and pathetic.

 

I clearly wrote as good OR can do the same job which is ABSOLUTELY true.

 

430U is on par with any of the cw/reward tanks.

 

907 and 260 everybody has them.  IS7 and SC are OP when hulldown and can do the same job as well.

 

Get your off your horse and stop crying.

 

Yes yes SC and friends need a nerf but still Chieftain and 279 are a level above them. In every game in ranked the team with more of those 2 tanks has won.

demon_tank #16 Posted 10 June 2019 - 02:15 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26785 battles
  • 1,561
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostKartoshkaya, on 10 June 2019 - 11:40 AM, said:

 

Then what's the problem of removing them from ranked?

No problem as long as you remove 430U , IS7 , SC , 5A , 277 , PROGETTO 65 and 268-4 as well. Then remove all the cw and missions tanks.

View PostStrizi, on 10 June 2019 - 12:06 PM, said:

 

Yes yes SC and friends need a nerf but still Chieftain and 279 are a level above them. In every game in ranked the team with more of those 2 tanks has won.

279 nobody is stopping you from getting one. The same with 260 .Nobody is stopping you and 31k players already got it.

 

From the 6 CW tanks 4 of them suck for Ranked and nobody would play them.

 

30k players have the 907 so stop crying about it. The 430U is as good , albeit sligthly different in gamestyle. No point of crying here.

 

So you re left with the Chieftain to cry because only 4900 players got it which btw is rivaled by the SC and IS7 albeit being clearly better.

 

So basically the generic arguement about ALL THE CW/REWARD tanks is nothing more than crying about 1 tank when at least 9 other good tanks exist that are fine for Ranked battles and can do a good job at it.

 

QQ MOAR.


Edited by demon_tank, 10 June 2019 - 02:51 PM.


Kartoshkaya #17 Posted 10 June 2019 - 02:31 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 27383 battles
  • 950
  • [HAPY-] HAPY-
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015

View Postdemon_tank, on 10 June 2019 - 02:15 PM, said:

Blablablablablabla

 

Why is it so important for you that some players gets an advantage over other players in a competitive mode ?



demon_tank #18 Posted 10 June 2019 - 02:57 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26785 battles
  • 1,561
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostKartoshkaya, on 10 June 2019 - 01:31 PM, said:

 

Why is it so important for you that some players gets an advantage over other players in a competitive mode ?

 

I dont have a problem if WG removes cw/mission tanks from Ranked. I dont give a f.

 

My problem is people who dont understand that removing 5 tanks wont change anything. In the next Ranked people will demand for the next batch of 5 OP tanks to be removed.

 

You re recognizing 5 tanks are a problem because you dont have them despite the fact you could get some of them relatively easily but you dont want to put the effort.

But you dont recognize that we have at least 7 more free tanks that will do the same thing. Why ?

 



Jauhesammutin #19 Posted 10 June 2019 - 03:00 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23618 battles
  • 989
  • [FAUF] FAUF
  • Member since:
    11-05-2013

View Postdemon_tank, on 10 June 2019 - 11:34 AM, said:

 

You re spining it the way you want it which is sad and pathetic.

 

I clearly wrote as good OR can do the same job which is ABSOLUTELY true.

 

430U is on par with any of the cw/reward tanks.

 

907 and 260 everybody has them.  IS7 and SC are OP when hulldown and can do the same job as well.

 

Get your off your horse and stop crying.

 

So remove them from ranked since everyone has them and tech tree tanks are as good or can do the same job.

demon_tank #20 Posted 10 June 2019 - 04:04 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26785 battles
  • 1,561
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostJauhesammutin, on 10 June 2019 - 02:00 PM, said:

 

So remove them from ranked since everyone has them and tech tree tanks are as good or can do the same job.

 

I dont care if they remove them. Owners of those tanks can still play them in random.

 

The problem would be justifying the removal since like i said free/standard tanks exist that are as good (430U) or can be as effective (IS7 , SC , PROGETTO 65 , 268-4 , 5A , 277).

 

How would you justify removing VK72 , 121B , T95E6 and M60 ??? They are subpar / mediocre or simply not great.

So remove 907 and Chieftain (which are OP) but keep the others ???

 

And then there are the missions tanks. 260 and 279. What would be the arguement for removing those ? Anyone can get them.31k already own the 260.

Remove one but keep the other ??? Doesnt make sense one bit to remove either.

 

We have weak / vague arguements and tricky , complex tasks at hand.

 

All i see here is a minefield.

 

You can as easily just come and say remove X tank for no reason at all.


Edited by demon_tank, 10 June 2019 - 04:06 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users