Jump to content


BIG POLL: What would you be prepared to pay for?


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

Poll: BIG POLL QUESTION: What would you be prepared to pay for with your hard earned €? (Beside ussual stuff sold by WG) (109 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

What would you be prepared to pay for beside ussual stuff ?

  1. No arty (39 votes [8.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.33%

  2. Tier8 BIA crew tanks (10 votes [2.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.14%

  3. Bundled discounted current BIA crew tanks, 5-6x Berlin package (8 votes [1.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.71%

  4. 2x(two zero skills) BIA+ one more crew member (16 votes [3.42%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.42%

  5. Camouflages with 5% camo rating (instedad of ussual 4%) (11 votes [2.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.35%

  6. Invisible camouflage-transparent (5 votes [1.07%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.07%

  7. Tier8 tanks if discounted (17 votes [3.63%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.63%

  8. Tier8 with huge credit potential (like type59 2G or some new invention like LOWE 2G etc..) (21 votes [4.49%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.49%

  9. Historical tanks, like Tiger 217 etc.. (21 votes [4.49%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.49%

  10. Non-techtree nation Premium tanks, like Israely M4, T34, or captured finnish T26, etc (18 votes [3.85%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.85%

  11. Historial 3D skins for exsisting trechtree tanks, like Israely skin for T34 (23 votes [4.91%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.91%

  12. Aufklärungspanzer Panther as Premium (short: Aufkl. Panther) (11 votes [2.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.35%

  13. Historical commanders as separate crew memebers (possible 2x zero) (10 votes [2.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.14%

  14. Commander crew member with 6th sense (13 votes [2.78%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.78%

  15. Female crew member(s) (14 votes [2.99%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.99%

  16. Twice a year lootboxes (16 votes [3.42%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.42%

  17. Larger lootbox bundles with greater discount (150 or 200 eur etc) (6 votes [1.28%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.28%

  18. Monthly / yearly subscription (6 votes [1.28%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.28%

  19. Increase of weekly credit vault (from 750-->2 or 3 mio) (13 votes [2.78%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.78%

  20. Blueprint swap (universal --> national) (24 votes [5.13%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.13%

  21. Premium account activated in regards of games played or days played (33 votes [7.05%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.05%

  22. x5 Budles with ON/OFF switch (12 votes [2.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.56%

  23. Historicaly accurate 3D styles-skins (18 votes [3.85%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.85%

  24. Enhanced equipment (which for now can be bought only for bonds) (13 votes [2.78%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.78%

  25. 50% or even 100% credit boosters (18 votes [3.85%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.85%

  26. Elited techtree tanks aquire Premium status with crew multiplier (possible also with credits) (22 votes [4.70%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.70%

  27. Tier10 Premium tanks with credit multiplier (21 votes [4.49%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.49%

  28. None of the above (29 votes [6.20%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.20%

Vote Hide poll

Zmago5000 #1 Posted 09 June 2019 - 07:48 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12242 battles
  • 757
  • Member since:
    11-24-2018
POLL

Edited by Zmago5000, 09 June 2019 - 08:01 AM.


jack_timber #2 Posted 09 June 2019 - 08:13 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 40323 battles
  • 3,249
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014
Only premium account.... Can live with the rest.

Tigerfish_Torpedo #3 Posted 09 June 2019 - 08:31 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 34279 battles
  • 204
  • [BC-V] BC-V
  • Member since:
    10-08-2013

You missed the option to have a separate server with all the 2-4k rated players on it.

 

In my mind it works like this...  Allow me to paint a picture... Imagine the Summer Olympics in full swing, the jostle and waving of national flags, supporters taking their seats and cheering their nations to glory in the pursuit of stunning, pressed-gold medals. The commentator announces, 'now we move to the swimming venue'... There, inside the massive indoor swimming arena is two distinctly different pools; the Olympic sized pool for those that take their sport seriously, and a second kids' pool with inflatable rubber rings, polystyrene floats, and a small diving board for those Olympians that simply want to 'play for fun'. Sure, they can 'splish and splash' with their national-flag-coloured armbands on, but please, keep them away from those that want to achieve something... 'Now, taking to the top board for Team Edited that likes to sit behind arty in his heavy tank'...

 

Seriously, I'd pay four times the cost of premium membership to see my teams not have 1k-3k top tier heavy tanks in tier 10 games.


Edited by Asklepi0s, 19 June 2019 - 09:09 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inflammatory remarks.


Laur_Balaur_XD #4 Posted 09 June 2019 - 09:09 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 37107 battles
  • 856
  • [CTRL-] CTRL-
  • Member since:
    04-20-2011

View PostTigerfish_Torpedo, on 09 June 2019 - 07:31 AM, said:

You missed the option to have a separate server with all the 2-4k rated players on it.

 

 

Hmmm, the 5k guy can't stand the 4k players to be on the same server with him....

 

Your comparative with Olympic games is beyond stupid. This is a online game with RANDOM matchmaking, not a top athletes competition. Randoms is like everyone meeting for a fun football game - from first league players to 12 yo kids.

If you want to put players on a ranked matchmaking based on their personal score or whatever, then the 10k PR guy should get 100 times more credits and xp as the 2k PR guy - like happens in anything competitive.


Edited by Laur_Balaur_XD, 09 June 2019 - 09:09 AM.


Tigerfish_Torpedo #5 Posted 09 June 2019 - 10:30 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 34279 battles
  • 204
  • [BC-V] BC-V
  • Member since:
    10-08-2013

View PostLaur_Balaur_XD, on 09 June 2019 - 09:09 AM, said:

 

Your comparative with Olympic games is beyond stupid. 

 

That's what I was going for, numb-nuts...

 

sarcasm
/ˈsɑːkaz(ə)m/
noun
noun: sarcasm; plural noun: sarcasms
the use of irony to mock or convey contempt.
"she didn't like the note of sarcasm in his voice"
synonyms: derision, mockery, ridicule, satire, irony, scorn, sneering, scoffing, gibing, taunting; More
trenchancy, mordancy, acerbity;
rarecausticity, mordacity
"his voice was


KanonenVogel19 #6 Posted 09 June 2019 - 10:36 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 390 battles
  • 539
  • Member since:
    04-05-2019

Hmm, a bit tricky poll, because while I would be willing to pay for quite a lot of the stuff you mentioned, a lot of these things are also P2W aspects on a smaller or bigger scale. For example, commanders with free 6th sense, more efficient camouflage, crew members with free skills, etc. Then I also think it would be a real shame to put historical items behind a paywall, for example Tiger 217 or historical commanders. I'm not saying that these historical items cannot be sold, just give F2P players a way to obtain them aswell, even if it takes 1-2 years.



Laur_Balaur_XD #7 Posted 09 June 2019 - 11:00 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 37107 battles
  • 856
  • [CTRL-] CTRL-
  • Member since:
    04-20-2011

View PostTigerfish_Torpedo, on 09 June 2019 - 09:30 AM, said:

 

That's what I was going for, numb-nuts...

 

sarcasm
/ˈsɑːkaz(ə)m/
noun
noun: sarcasm; plural noun: sarcasms
the use of irony to mock or convey contempt.
"she didn't like the note of sarcasm in his voice"
synonyms: derision, mockery, ridicule, satire, irony, scorn, sneering, scoffing, gibing, taunting; More
trenchancy, mordancy, acerbity;
rarecausticity, mordacity
"his voice was

 

I think you missed the point:

- you say that is stupid for everyone to be playing on the same field

- i say that is not, because that is what random means

- and on top of that if you want players to be separated in leagues based on their PR, then you should pay the 10k PR guys 100 times more than the 3k guys get. And i don't think that anyone would want that, not that you actually have anything to do with credits and xp past a point in this game - everything becomes more or less useless.



Tigerfish_Torpedo #8 Posted 09 June 2019 - 11:24 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 34279 battles
  • 204
  • [BC-V] BC-V
  • Member since:
    10-08-2013

View PostLaur_Balaur_XD, on 09 June 2019 - 11:00 AM, said:

 

I think you missed the point:

- you say that is stupid for everyone to be playing on the same field

- i say that is not, because that is what random means

- and on top of that if you want players to be separated in leagues based on their PR, then you should pay the 10k PR guys 100 times more than the 3k guys get. And i don't think that anyone would want that, not that you actually have anything to do with credits and xp past a point in this game - everything becomes more or less useless.

 

Actually (and I'll offer this disclaimer now, to avoid the usual responses to this opinion; This is my own personal opinion, and I really don't need graphs and tables to prove my personal opinion is incorrect), I'd rather see a skill based matchmaker.

 

I played a game this morning, where we had a 19% win chance. The top three tanks on our team were all sub 3k rated (at tier 10), yet the enemy team had a platoon of Object 260s (2 of which were rated over 10k). The 15-1 roflstomp that occurred as a result, was quite honestly, not surprising given the stats of the players. See, people say 'remove XVM', but it wouldn't change the team line-up, nor the final result of the game. It just makes us oblivious.

 

Either putting weaker players (those credited with 'bad' or 'below average' ratings (based on either player rating or wn8)) in a special 'play for fun' sandpit, or introducing a skill based MMer, or even denying players below a certain rating of playing specific tiers would result in a better experience. Bottom line is, and in response to the OP's initial post, I would gladly pay WG extra money to offer a matchmaker that delivers fairer games. As it currently stands, I haven't given WG any money for over a year, and I won't any time soon - sorry WG, but I'm truly frustrated with the matchmaker.



Jumping_Turtle #9 Posted 09 June 2019 - 11:44 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 69445 battles
  • 7,541
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013
It all depends on the price and how some of your picks are specified. Like I would buy the Aufklarungs if it is the old tier 7 version, but not the 'updated' tier 8 version.

DuncaN_101 #10 Posted 09 June 2019 - 12:36 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 56009 battles
  • 3,004
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
None of it.

Im playing premium and besides that I don't want to pay for anything else.

Laur_Balaur_XD #11 Posted 09 June 2019 - 01:20 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 37107 battles
  • 856
  • [CTRL-] CTRL-
  • Member since:
    04-20-2011

View PostTigerfish_Torpedo, on 09 June 2019 - 10:24 AM, said:

 

Actually (and I'll offer this disclaimer now, to avoid the usual responses to this opinion; This is my own personal opinion, and I really don't need graphs and tables to prove my personal opinion is incorrect), I'd rather see a skill based matchmaker.

 

I played a game this morning, where we had a 19% win chance. The top three tanks on our team were all sub 3k rated (at tier 10), yet the enemy team had a platoon of Object 260s (2 of which were rated over 10k). The 15-1 roflstomp that occurred as a result, was quite honestly, not surprising given the stats of the players.

Because of how human mind works people always remember the cases when they had a unfair disadvantage (like you 19% chance to win game) but they don't remember the opposite cases (like when they are in the 80% chance to win team). 

See, people say 'remove XVM', but it wouldn't change the team line-up, nor the final result of the game. It just makes us oblivious.

I would give you the same advice, i used XVM long time (pretty much since it appeared) but at some moment i got tired of updating mods after every patch and micropatch - now i have @2 years without XVM and i can tell you that the game is much more enjoyable to play and it does not affect my performance. You don't get upset when you have a bad team, you don't get to aggressive and fail when you have a good team, you just play the game as it should be played.

 

Either putting weaker players (those credited with 'bad' or 'below average' ratings (based on either player rating or wn8)) in a special 'play for fun' sandpit, or introducing a skill based MMer, or even denying players below a certain rating of playing specific tiers would result in a better experience.

Putting all bad players to play between them would mean denying any chance for them to improve.

Denying people access to content of the game just because they are bad at this game would be the most idiotic thing ever in the history of video games. Bad players already have some things in the game that they probably never get - like CW rewards and ranked rewards.

Bottom line is, and in response to the OP's initial post, I would gladly pay WG extra money to offer a matchmaker that delivers fairer games. As it currently stands, I haven't given WG any money for over a year, and I won't any time soon - sorry WG, but I'm truly frustrated with the matchmaker.

You get sometimes good teams and sometimes bad teams because it is called 'random battle' , if you want same skill go play detachment or advance - and you will see the joy or 'skill based mm'...

 


Edited by Laur_Balaur_XD, 09 June 2019 - 01:21 PM.


Zylon0 #12 Posted 09 June 2019 - 01:38 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 9765 battles
  • 188
  • Member since:
    01-06-2011

One thing I never understood about them not selling this years ago..

To have a tank skin that looks factory new. 

 

The most experienced and best tank groups, where supplied with the newest and best equipment.

I do not want a tank that looks beat up and 2nd or 3rth hand.

 

I do want a tank that looks like it just rolled off the production line.


Edited by Zylon0, 09 June 2019 - 01:38 PM.


DuncaN_101 #13 Posted 09 June 2019 - 01:54 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 56009 battles
  • 3,004
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
Dunno.. If I played 1k games in a tank I find it hard to believe that it's fresh from the factory.
But its an arcade game so there is why.

SilentFear #14 Posted 09 June 2019 - 02:53 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 26348 battles
  • 3,289
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    01-29-2011
No arta. They introduce that and im paying instantly. 

unhappy_bunny #15 Posted 09 June 2019 - 03:17 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 19810 battles
  • 3,530
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

Error in the poll?

 

28 options.

Can pick max 27.

 

This means you can pick 26 things you'd be willing to pay for and then annul them by also picking "None of the above".

 

 

So I picked "No Arty" and "None of the above". Which vote counted?


Edited by unhappy_bunny, 09 June 2019 - 03:19 PM.


mpf1959 #16 Posted 09 June 2019 - 04:02 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28404 battles
  • 1,591
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-29-2017
None of the above, but I would like to be able to change the nationality of crew members, and wouldn't be averse to parting with either a lot of credits, or a small amount of gold to do so.

anonym_buNSL9e2tZp3 #17 Posted 09 June 2019 - 04:04 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 29
  • Member since:
    08-10-2019
Preferential MM & something to stop me being bottom tier more often than not as I seem to be lately.

Blubba #18 Posted 09 June 2019 - 05:06 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 60182 battles
  • 2,358
  • Member since:
    05-30-2011

I'd like the Lorraine (for example) to be offered without the go faster crew, 3x camouflages and garage slot and at a reduced price to reflect it. Say around £25.

I'd like some of those over priced underperforming tier 8 tanks in the premium shop to be reduced to better reflect that (or buff them).

I'd like them to offer that BDR skin at something approaching sensible. 

That's a few of things I might be prepared to pay for.

 



vasilinhorulezz #19 Posted 09 June 2019 - 05:21 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28027 battles
  • 1,997
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014
Oh, now it's a poll.

Bordhaw #20 Posted 09 June 2019 - 05:22 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 14894 battles
  • 4,892
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostZmago5000, on 09 June 2019 - 06:48 AM, said:

What would you be prepared to pay for?

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users