Jump to content


Disappointed In Ranked

ranked

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
44 replies to this topic

demon_tank #21 Posted 10 June 2019 - 02:46 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26507 battles
  • 1,473
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostKartoshkaya, on 10 June 2019 - 01:36 PM, said:

 

So you admit having this tank is a chance.

 

What if you're not interrested into clan sh*t ? Why would you get penalized in a non clan related mode ?

 

Having the 260 or 279 tanks is a matter of skill + time + dedication/effort + luck. noone is stopping you to get them.

 

Having ANY cw tank is a matter of stacking A LOT of bonds (auction) OR playing the CW events if you have time and the better you are in the game the better your chances are.

 

Its not impossible to get one.

 

Plus a decent number of free/standard tanks can do the same job.

 

The whole "cw/missions tanks too good for Ranked" arguement isnt as strong as people claim. Thats all i am saying. Nothing more nothing less.

 

And lets put it this way so you may understand. IF we remove/exclude CW/missions tanks from Ranked (which i have no problem with) all you ll see in the teams will be 430Us vs 430Us with the occasional SC or IS7.

 

Did you fix anything ? Doubt it. 

 

So what does Ricky "salty not having the Chieftain" Rolls have to say about that ?


Edited by demon_tank, 10 June 2019 - 02:50 PM.


Kartoshkaya #22 Posted 10 June 2019 - 03:46 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26085 battles
  • 761
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015

View Postdemon_tank, on 10 June 2019 - 02:46 PM, said:

 

Having the 260 or 279 tanks is a matter of skill + time + dedication/effort + luck. noone is stopping you to get them.

 

Having ANY cw tank is a matter of stacking A LOT of bonds (auction) OR playing the CW events if you have time and the better you are in the game the better your chances are.

 

Its not impossible to get one.

 

Plus a decent number of free/standard tanks can do the same job.

 

The whole "cw/missions tanks too good for Ranked" arguement isnt as strong as people claim. Thats all i am saying. Nothing more nothing less.

 

And lets put it this way so you may understand. IF we remove/exclude CW/missions tanks from Ranked (which i have no problem with) all you ll see in the teams will be 430Us vs 430Us with the occasional SC or IS7.

 

Did you fix anything ? Doubt it. 

 

So what does Ricky "salty not having the Chieftain" Rolls have to say about that ?

 

Oh I see, you just totally missed the point. We are not talking about fixing tanks here, we are talking about balancing a 'competitive' mode between players who don't farm bonds/get into clans/doesn't achieved campaigns in a mode wich isn't supposed to be related to those three things.



demon_tank #23 Posted 10 June 2019 - 03:53 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26507 battles
  • 1,473
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostKartoshkaya, on 10 June 2019 - 02:46 PM, said:

 

Oh I see, you just totally missed the point. We are not talking about fixing tanks here, we are talking about balancing a 'competitive' mode between players who don't farm bonds/get into clans/doesn't achieved campaigns in a mode wich isn't supposed to be related to those three things.

 

I didnt miss anything im just replying to those who talk about the "too good for Ranked tanks".

Kartoshkaya #24 Posted 10 June 2019 - 03:56 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26085 battles
  • 761
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015

View Postdemon_tank, on 10 June 2019 - 03:53 PM, said:

 

I didnt miss anything im just replying to those who talk about the "too good for Ranked tanks".

 

Well you clearly missed my point then since you quoted me.



avr7002 #25 Posted 10 June 2019 - 04:19 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 34296 battles
  • 289
  • Member since:
    02-28-2013

Played 500 battles in ranked, reach 8 rank. Waste of time and money. Spend 10 milj credits and 1500 bonds, received 300000 credits and 300 bonds.



avr7002 #26 Posted 10 June 2019 - 04:31 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 34296 battles
  • 289
  • Member since:
    02-28-2013

How my highest rank in end was 7, If I get 8 rank and 2 chevron in it, near 9 rank?



Kartoshkaya #27 Posted 10 June 2019 - 04:50 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26085 battles
  • 761
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015

View Postavr7002, on 10 June 2019 - 04:31 PM, said:

How my highest rank in end was 7, If I get 8 rank and 2 chevron in it, near 9 rank?

 

You understand nobody here can help you with that matter ? Just go to support.

demon_tank #28 Posted 10 June 2019 - 07:40 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26507 battles
  • 1,473
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostKartoshkaya, on 10 June 2019 - 02:56 PM, said:

 

Well you clearly missed my point then since you quoted me.

 

View PostKartoshkaya, on 10 June 2019 - 02:46 PM, said:

 

Oh I see, you just totally missed the point. We are not talking about fixing tanks here, we are talking about balancing a 'competitive' mode between players who don't farm bonds/get into clans/doesn't achieved campaigns in a mode wich isn't supposed to be related to those three things.

 

I actually didnt.

 

Your point is beyond moronic.

 

"Balancing a competitive mode between players who farm X and players who dont farm X" has nothing to do with the problem of Ranked.

 

The root of one of the major problems here is OP tanks that should be nerffed.

 

What you re implying is impossible and stupid. You expect for all participants to play with the same tanks , crew , equipment and consumables ???

Maybe add the same ammo loadout as well while we re at it ?

 

Fix the tank balance have all tanks be NOT op and you re good. Your imaginaty utopian safe space cant exist nor should it.

 

 


Edited by demon_tank, 10 June 2019 - 08:11 PM.


Bordhaw #29 Posted 10 June 2019 - 07:40 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 14142 battles
  • 4,364
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View Posttajj7, on 10 June 2019 - 08:22 AM, said:

I gave up on Saturday, got to Div 1 rank 9 but just couldn't be bothered to keep pushing on to try to finish it.

 

The gameplay is horrible, they don't reward playing for the win, they punish you for having a crap team by making you go backwards and the game is dominated by meta tanks.

 

 

View Posttajj7, on 29 March 2019 - 02:26 PM, said:

 

 just shows that people are very resistant to change and new stuff they like to whine about instead of learning to fight against. 

 



Minio #30 Posted 10 June 2019 - 09:15 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 43339 battles
  • 679
  • [AVIT] AVIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postdemon_tank, on 10 June 2019 - 02:53 PM, said:

 

I didnt miss anything im just replying to those who talk about the "too good for Ranked tanks".

 

Just stop embarrasing yourself already, you've already said that 430U is OP and that statement alone is laughable.

demon_tank #31 Posted 10 June 2019 - 09:53 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26507 battles
  • 1,473
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostMinio, on 10 June 2019 - 08:15 PM, said:

 

Just stop embarrasing yourself already, you've already said that 430U is OP and that statement alone is laughable.

 

Guys we have a winner here. A unicum who doesnt know 430U is OP.

 

 

:facepalm:

 

:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:


Edited by demon_tank, 10 June 2019 - 09:54 PM.


Ricky_Rolls #32 Posted 11 June 2019 - 10:10 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 71575 battles
  • 1,618
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    11-10-2010

Damn, feels like i'm loosing braincells by reading your comments. I remember a time where the 5a, superconq and 430u were considered OP. Tanks that either have big *** cupolas, or can be penned frontally on the turret with gold. Now we get a chieftain that goes 40kph, has a 2cm high cupola on top of an is7 turret with -10° of gun depression, and a 260 which is virtually immune when he's reverse sidescraping, while going as fast as a 277, while having more dpm and overall far superior armor. The sheer fact that reward tanks are better than standard ones is beyond stupid. 

 

Oh and btw, i'm not saying this because "hahahahaha i missed the chieftain", i just didn't want to play at that time and it's perfectly fine, i'm saying this because it's nothing but a fact. It's not because i'm shooting gold in random that i can't have an unbiased opinion about the fact that it's unhealthy for the game, even tho whe you see the most recent addition to the game you could easily think it's pretty much needed.

Just like i'm not saying that peoples shouldn't be allowed to play those tanks, it's just that they shouldn't be that good in the first place.



Kartoshkaya #33 Posted 11 June 2019 - 10:13 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26085 battles
  • 761
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015

View Postdemon_tank, on 10 June 2019 - 07:40 PM, said:

 

 

I actually didnt.

 

Your point is beyond moronic.

 

"Balancing a competitive mode between players who farm X and players who dont farm X" has nothing to do with the problem of Ranked.

 

The root of one of the major problems here is OP tanks that should be nerffed.

 

What you re implying is impossible and stupid. You expect for all participants to play with the same tanks , crew , equipment and consumables ???

Maybe add the same ammo loadout as well while we re at it ?

 

Fix the tank balance have all tanks be NOT op and you re good. Your imaginaty utopian safe space cant exist nor should it.

 

 

 

You're the morron overextending words i never writen.

 

The op said clan players have an advantage with those tanks, implying everyone could Access them pr nobody to all get into the same base of tanks.

 

You clearly can't understand what this is all about i suggest you to stop trying you're gonna hurt yourself little boy.



8126Jakobsson #34 Posted 11 June 2019 - 10:24 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 76697 battles
  • 4,607
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostRicky_Rolls, on 11 June 2019 - 10:10 AM, said:

260 which is virtually immune when he's reverse sidescraping

 

Well you can always shoot at its mantle and hope it ricochets down to pen.  :hiding:



Minio #35 Posted 11 June 2019 - 10:32 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 43339 battles
  • 679
  • [AVIT] AVIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postdemon_tank, on 10 June 2019 - 08:53 PM, said:

 

Guys we have a winner here. A unicum who doesnt know 430U is OP.

 

 

:facepalm:

 

:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

 

It is in randoms versus bots, not in ranked where every 330pen shell goes through upper plate.

S_E_N_N_A #36 Posted 11 June 2019 - 11:17 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 45933 battles
  • 616
  • [USAGI] USAGI
  • Member since:
    09-07-2014
Luckily i have learned from past experience not to play ranked,but i do play Frontline i reached prestige 6 i feel the rewards in Frontline is much better gold,bonds,credits and more credits for battles and ofc reward tanks

Edited by S_E_N_N_A, 11 June 2019 - 11:22 AM.


demon_tank #37 Posted 11 June 2019 - 01:52 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26507 battles
  • 1,473
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostRicky_Rolls, on 11 June 2019 - 09:10 AM, said:

Damn, feels like i'm loosing braincells by reading your comments. I remember a time where the 5a, superconq and 430u were considered OP. Tanks that either have big *** cupolas, or can be penned frontally on the turret with gold. Now we get a chieftain that goes 40kph, has a 2cm high cupola on top of an is7 turret with -10° of gun depression, and a 260 which is virtually immune when he's reverse sidescraping, while going as fast as a 277, while having more dpm and overall far superior armor. The sheer fact that reward tanks are better than standard ones is beyond stupid. 

 

Oh and btw, i'm not saying this because "hahahahaha i missed the chieftain", i just didn't want to play at that time and it's perfectly fine, i'm saying this because it's nothing but a fact. It's not because i'm shooting gold in random that i can't have an unbiased opinion about the fact that it's unhealthy for the game, even tho whe you see the most recent addition to the game you could easily think it's pretty much needed.

Just like i'm not saying that peoples shouldn't be allowed to play those tanks, it's just that they shouldn't be that good in the first place.

 

You still didnt answer (because you cant) how you re planning to justify the removal of clan wars and missions tanks.

 

Do you still need a memo about the owner count of the 907 and 260 or what ? Everybody has them.

 

And 260 , 279 are available to EVERYONE.

 

Do you agree that instead of removing tanks nerffs are better because they are fair and actually fix all problems ??

 

Do you understand that "special status" or being "more suitable for certain modes" ARE NOT grounds for removal ???

 

No answers just hiding behind platitudes and personal attacks.

 

You shot up my many places in my "fools in the forum list" something i didnt expect judging by your forum presence.


Edited by demon_tank, 11 June 2019 - 01:52 PM.


demon_tank #38 Posted 11 June 2019 - 02:08 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26507 battles
  • 1,473
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostMinio, on 11 June 2019 - 09:32 AM, said:

 

It is in randoms versus bots, not in ranked where every 330pen shell goes through upper plate.

 

CRINGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE AF.

 

I saw a decent amount of 430Us dominating Ranked.

 

The fact you re twisting things the way they suit you is pathetic. 430U is OP or not. It clearly is and you tried to panint a picture that its not. PATHETIC.

 

Being a meta or more suitable tank for a certain mode DOES NOT always equal an OP tank and vice verca.

 

Before the 430U or the 907 the obj 140 dminated the med selection in CW. noone was playing the Patton or the E50M.

Still the E50M and the Patton are great tanks and the obj 140 isnt OP.

 

IF WG removes the 430 and the 907 the CW med choice will still be the 140 despite the fact the Patton and the E50M are as good in randoms.

 

Everyone playing the 140 justifies a removal from CW ?



tajj7 #39 Posted 11 June 2019 - 02:17 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 27578 battles
  • 15,327
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

The 430U is OP, but the 279e and T95 are even more OP. 

 

All need nerfing and it improve ranked a lot just with those simple changes. 



Wot_in_2k19 #40 Posted 11 June 2019 - 02:23 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 46767 battles
  • 294
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    08-14-2012
To be honest i m not blame the players who use that OP FV is about WG who balance this game in 1 patch one tank is ok next patch is trash for example look at fv 4005 they buff the tank after that nerff like crazy and then sell FV215b 183 for 25 mill just [edited]&#$%%(@!#*





Also tagged with ranked

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users