50 replies to this topic

[johncl]

I promise i will buy these pixels , On the first of April  

[Griesgram_der_Grobe]

vuque, on 11 June 2019 - 11:38 AM, said:

Simona2k, on 11 June 2019 - 09:56 AM, said:

no thank you

 

May I ask why?

 

 

0/10 trolling attempt

[vuque]

Guys, I see some of you are questioning why I asked one of you to provide more details. The reason is simply to have a better understanding over what you guys are talking about, get the reasoning behind and encourage you to provide constructive feedback instead of just writing "I like it" or "I didn't like it".  

 

P.S: I know many of you already provided detailed feedback and thanks for that but I am trying to see if other players have another point of view about why they didn't like it.

Edited by vuque, 12 June 2019 - 09:23 AM.

[Anna_Kalashnikova]

vuque, on 12 June 2019 - 10:22 AM, said:

Guys, I see some of you are questioning why I asked one of you to provide more details. The reason is simply to have a better understanding over what you guys are talking about, get the reasoning behind and encourage you to provide constructive feedback instead of just writing "I like it" or "I didn't like it".  

 

P.S: I know many of you already provided detailed feedback and thanks for that but I am trying to see if other players have another point of view about why they didn't like it.

 

well i have seen you - and your colleagues - do this on several occassions and i always considered it a good move. Many people just unload ther unevaluated "opion" without pointing out, what brings them there.

 

BUT, this one is a clear matter, wich is why your attempt to "teach" us how to feedback is a little bit disturbing at this time

 

 

I would never buy a medium Tank with mediocre medium alpha and artillery-gunhandling.

 

P.S.: Looking e.g. at the FV4201 thread a simple "it's bad" wouldn't be enough. It's not bad, it's just worse than the Cent 5/1, but it is definitely something you can discuss about, while this

 

… moving 0.35

… tank traverse 0.35

 

means, there is absolutely no reason (apart from "it looks nice" or "i want all the tanks" ) someone could leave a goodr word about the tank

Edited by Anna_Kalashnikova, 12 June 2019 - 09:57 AM.

[Sir_Armand]

vuque, on 12 June 2019 - 09:22 AM, said:

Guys, I see some of you are questioning why I asked one of you to provide more details. The reason is simply to have a better understanding over what you guys are talking about, get the reasoning behind and encourage you to provide constructive feedback instead of just writing "I like it" or "I didn't like it".  

 

P.S: I know many of you already provided detailed feedback and thanks for that but I am trying to see if other players have another point of view about why they didn't like it.

 

nice

[Badz360]

Laatikkomafia, on 11 June 2019 - 01:24 PM, said:

EDIT2: To put the gun handling into a perspective, the ausf. K has same gun handling while on the move as the tier 5 clicker, Grille.

 

This is hilarious!

 

Unfortunately true also.

[Dexatroph]

vuque, on 12 June 2019 - 09:22 AM, said:

 

P.S: I know many of you already provided detailed feedback and thanks for that but I am trying to see if other players have another point of view about why they didn't like it.

 

May I ask whether you have passed over our feedback to the game designers which are responsible for such crazy balance? The horrible stabilisation can just be a bug what wasnt corrected for years. =)  

[anonym_Z2kv0BD9jwqB]

I bought this tank  and must feedback my disappointment.

 

I  like how tank looks, but for me this tank is not workable in battle at all.

 

I understand I have poor skills but this tank compared ot others cant  perform for me at all, as people said its aiming is poor as its  some artillery, in a german medium tank?

I dont know, this tank teached me to watch what tanks I am buying and to seek advice from more experienced players.

 

I would advice anyone never to read what is said about tank in promo material( tank description in premium shop )because this is in serrious nagotiations  with  reality.

 

[Kirtiklis]

Gun soft stats super bad. You are slow like a heavy with no armor. 1 hit and your engine damaged. This tank dont have anything and have normal MM. Hydrostat way better tank with PMM, and pz V/IV superior compare with this. Then it was introduced before 3 years, it was already weak. Gun handling like a KV2 heavy derp. It says all about tank.

[anonym_Z2kv0BD9jwqB]

Kirtiklis, on 15 June 2019 - 08:42 AM, said:

Gun soft stats super bad. You are slow like a heavy with no armor. 1 hit and your engine damaged. This tank dont have anything and have normal MM. Hydrostat way better tank with PMM, and pz V/IV superior compare with this. Then it was introduced before 3 years, it was already weak. Gun handling like a KV2 heavy derp. It says all about tank.

 

 

This tank is as such in game  for 3 years ?

 

 

[Dexatroph]

vuque, on 12 June 2019 - 09:22 AM, said:

 

P.S: I know many of you already provided detailed feedback and thanks for that but I am trying to see if other players have another point of view about why they didn't like it.

 

Hey Vuque,

 

I would like to follow up with you on that topic. Please see my post from 10 days ago:  http://forum.worldof...#entry16993341.

 

Thank you.