Jump to content


Panzer Hybrid: the Pz.Kpfw. III Ausf. K


  • Please log in to reply
49 replies to this topic

johncl #41 Posted 11 June 2019 - 11:24 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53380 battles
  • 1,376
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011
I promise i will buy these pixels , On the first of April  

Griesgram_der_Grobe #42 Posted 11 June 2019 - 11:54 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 18747 battles
  • 3,009
  • [HCD] HCD
  • Member since:
    11-18-2010

View Postvuque, on 11 June 2019 - 11:38 AM, said:

View PostSimona2k, on 11 June 2019 - 09:56 AM, said:

no thank you

 

May I ask why?

 

:facepalm:

 

0/10 trolling attempt



vuque #43 Posted 12 June 2019 - 09:22 AM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 18216 battles
  • 3,531
  • [YOQ] YOQ
  • Member since:
    08-05-2010

Guys, I see some of you are questioning why I asked one of you to provide more details. The reason is simply to have a better understanding over what you guys are talking about, get the reasoning behind and encourage you to provide constructive feedback instead of just writing "I like it" or "I didn't like it". ;) 

 

P.S: I know many of you already provided detailed feedback and thanks for that but I am trying to see if other players have another point of view about why they didn't like it.


Edited by vuque, 12 June 2019 - 09:23 AM.


Anna_Kalashnikova #44 Posted 12 June 2019 - 09:52 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 13987 battles
  • 5,692
  • [ST0RM] ST0RM
  • Member since:
    08-21-2011

View Postvuque, on 12 June 2019 - 10:22 AM, said:

Guys, I see some of you are questioning why I asked one of you to provide more details. The reason is simply to have a better understanding over what you guys are talking about, get the reasoning behind and encourage you to provide constructive feedback instead of just writing "I like it" or "I didn't like it". ;) 

 

P.S: I know many of you already provided detailed feedback and thanks for that but I am trying to see if other players have another point of view about why they didn't like it.

 

well i have seen you - and your colleagues - do this on several occassions and i always considered it a good move. Many people just unload ther unevaluated "opion" without pointing out, what brings them there.

 

BUT, this one is a clear matter, wich is why your attempt to "teach" us how to feedback is a little bit disturbing at this time :D

 

 

I would never buy a medium Tank with mediocre medium alpha and artillery-gunhandling.

 

P.S.: Looking e.g. at the FV4201 thread a simple "it's bad" wouldn't be enough. It's not bad, it's just worse than the Cent 5/1, but it is definitely something you can discuss about, while this

 
… moving 0.35
… tank traverse 0.35
 
means, there is absolutely no reason (apart from "it looks nice" or "i want all the tanks" ) someone could leave a goodr word about the tank :D

Edited by Anna_Kalashnikova, 12 June 2019 - 09:57 AM.


Sir_Armand #45 Posted 12 June 2019 - 05:39 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19898 battles
  • 344
  • [FILO2] FILO2
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011

View Postvuque, on 12 June 2019 - 09:22 AM, said:

Guys, I see some of you are questioning why I asked one of you to provide more details. The reason is simply to have a better understanding over what you guys are talking about, get the reasoning behind and encourage you to provide constructive feedback instead of just writing "I like it" or "I didn't like it". ;) 

 

P.S: I know many of you already provided detailed feedback and thanks for that but I am trying to see if other players have another point of view about why they didn't like it.

 

nice

Badz360 #46 Posted 12 June 2019 - 09:50 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17037 battles
  • 231
  • [BC-X] BC-X
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostLaatikkomafia, on 11 June 2019 - 01:24 PM, said:

EDIT2: To put the gun handling into a perspective, the ausf. K has same gun handling while on the move as the tier 5 clicker, Grille.

 

This is hilarious!

 

Unfortunately true also.



Dexatroph #47 Posted 14 June 2019 - 07:36 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 47500 battles
  • 3,353
  • Member since:
    02-09-2013

View Postvuque, on 12 June 2019 - 09:22 AM, said:

 

P.S: I know many of you already provided detailed feedback and thanks for that but I am trying to see if other players have another point of view about why they didn't like it.

 

May I ask whether you have passed over our feedback to the game designers which are responsible for such crazy balance? The horrible stabilisation can just be a bug what wasnt corrected for years. =)  



Ahch_To #48 Posted 15 June 2019 - 07:50 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 438 battles
  • 30
  • Member since:
    05-03-2019

I bought this tank  and must feedback my disappointment.

 

I  like how tank looks, but for me this tank is not workable in battle at all.

 

I understand I have poor skills but this tank compared ot others cant  perform for me at all, as people said its aiming is poor as its  some artillery, in a german medium tank?


I dont know, this tank teached me to watch what tanks I am buying and to seek advice from more experienced players.

 

I would advice anyone never to read what is said about tank in promo material( tank description in premium shop )because this is in serrious nagotiations  with  reality.


 


Edited by Ahch_To, 15 June 2019 - 08:04 AM.


Kirtiklis #49 Posted 15 June 2019 - 08:42 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 37470 battles
  • 102
  • [STLT] STLT
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013
Gun soft stats super bad. You are slow like a heavy with no armor. 1 hit and your engine damaged. This tank dont have anything and have normal MM. Hydrostat way better tank with PMM, and pz V/IV superior compare with this. Then it was introduced before 3 years, it was already weak. Gun handling like a KV2 heavy derp. It says all about tank.

Ahch_To #50 Posted 15 June 2019 - 10:19 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 438 battles
  • 30
  • Member since:
    05-03-2019

View PostKirtiklis, on 15 June 2019 - 08:42 AM, said:

Gun soft stats super bad. You are slow like a heavy with no armor. 1 hit and your engine damaged. This tank dont have anything and have normal MM. Hydrostat way better tank with PMM, and pz V/IV superior compare with this. Then it was introduced before 3 years, it was already weak. Gun handling like a KV2 heavy derp. It says all about tank.

 

 

This tank is as such in game  for 3 years ?


 


 


Edited by Ahch_To, 15 June 2019 - 11:10 AM.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users