Jump to content


Blacklist thread (again)...

blacklist blacklist limit increase limit

  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

dex_1950 #1 Posted 23 June 2019 - 06:32 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34408 battles
  • 527
  • [N1GER] N1GER
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014

I have tried a couple of times. It's time to do it again.

 

Increase at least limit by 100x. Unless we can get: 



NekoPuffer_PPP #2 Posted 23 June 2019 - 06:35 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 33379 battles
  • 3,702
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

Mine's full too. I'd like a bigger limit.

 

...that clan tag though...:amazed:



rsanders5 #3 Posted 23 June 2019 - 06:43 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28348 battles
  • 553
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013

View PostNekoPuffer_PPP, on 23 June 2019 - 05:35 PM, said:

Mine's full too. I'd like a bigger limit.

 

...that clan tag though...:amazed:

 

 It only has one G in it, & would be pronounced similar to 

Nigeria. so wouldn't be classed as offensive.



Gruff_ #4 Posted 23 June 2019 - 06:53 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19297 battles
  • 631
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    09-22-2011

I cleared mine out to start again figuring most have fallen by the wayside whilst I wasn't playing for 2 years, and those that hadn't would soon ID themselves with any extreme toxic chat or ingame behaviour.  Funnily enough I just had a 2 week break and the first 3 or 4 games last night had people going blue and wishes of cancer/family abuse, toxic  beyond banter type chat going on.

 

I really think a lot of players would get on better playing 1 player games, rather than trying team based stuff, but that problem is instrinsic with the random thown together system we have here.

 

What are people's criteria for black listing? I used to fill mine with bots (in the old sense), extreme hate/insults asshat types, obvious team pushers/damager trolls



Bordhaw #5 Posted 23 June 2019 - 06:58 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 14128 battles
  • 4,325
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostGruff_, on 23 June 2019 - 05:53 PM, said:

What are people's criteria for black listing? I used to fill mine with bots (in the old sense), extreme hate/insults asshat types, obvious team pushers/damager trolls

 

What is the use of blacklisting a player though.. none

NekoPuffer_PPP #6 Posted 23 June 2019 - 07:00 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 33379 battles
  • 3,702
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

View Postrsanders5, on 23 June 2019 - 06:43 PM, said:

 It only has one G in it, & would be pronounced similar to 

Nigeria. so wouldn't be classed as offensive.

 

So that means, if I used "purrvy" (referencing cats) instead of "pervy" (original quote) in my username, I never would've been forced to change it?

 

PFFFFFhahahaha :D ...MAN the way this world works, just keeps blowing my mind day by day, maybe I should blow my own mind, huh? :trollface:



Dorander #7 Posted 23 June 2019 - 07:05 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 21014 battles
  • 5,323
  • Member since:
    05-07-2012

View PostNekoPuffer_PPP, on 23 June 2019 - 06:00 PM, said:

 

So that means, if I used "purrvy" (referencing cats) instead of "pervy" (original quote) in my username, I never would've been forced to change it?

 

PFFFFFhahahaha :D ...MAN the way this world works, just keeps blowing my mind day by day, maybe I should blow my own mind, huh? :trollface:

 

It's also the name of a river, spelled exactly like that.

 

I'm not going to theorize about the choice of the tag, but it isn't automatically offensive just because something offensive looks a lot like it.

 

"Ginger" is an anagram for the other word but we're not massively banning people from talking about the plant or root either. Also I highly recommend Tim Minchin's song about it :hiding:



Amnariel #8 Posted 23 June 2019 - 07:06 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 3641 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    11-30-2013

Blacklist could be used as a guide for WG to ban ppl.The most blacklisted players should be monitorized then banned.

I am sure there are players whos are blacklisted at more than 100players.



Dorander #9 Posted 23 June 2019 - 07:10 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 21014 battles
  • 5,323
  • Member since:
    05-07-2012

View PostAmnariel, on 23 June 2019 - 06:06 PM, said:

Blacklist could be used as a guide for WG to ban ppl.The most blacklisted players should be monitorized then banned.

I am sure there are players whos are blacklisted at more than 100players.

 

Yeah, because nobody gets blacklisted by mob mentality. Remember when unsportsmanlike conduct had a low threshold and people started reporting unicums for fun because they knew it resulted in bans?

 

Nothing ever goes wrong with mob justice. Nope.



Amnariel #10 Posted 23 June 2019 - 07:16 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 3641 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    11-30-2013

View PostDorander, on 23 June 2019 - 06:10 PM, said:

 

Yeah, because nobody gets blacklisted by mob mentality. Remember when unsportsmanlike conduct had a low threshold and people started reporting unicums for fun because they knew it resulted in bans?

 

Nothing ever goes wrong with mob justice. Nope.

 

If someone is blacklisted and reported from over 1k unique players it means something,then WG have the ability to join any battle as spectator and watch what the guy does,this way is sure that player is banned with good reason.

If it`s false the admin will see in few battles and can be forgotten.



r00barb #11 Posted 23 June 2019 - 07:20 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 26706 battles
  • 10,807
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostGruff_, on 23 June 2019 - 05:53 PM, said:

What are people's criteria for black listing? I used to fill mine with bots (in the old sense), extreme hate/insults asshat types, obvious team pushers/damager trolls

 

I think the majority on mine are ping spammers from before we had the option to block messages for a single battle. I'd clear it out but I really don't care enough.



evilchaosmonkey #12 Posted 23 June 2019 - 07:22 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17832 battles
  • 1,972
  • [EIGHT] EIGHT
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

OP creates a clan with the obvious intent (yes, it is obvious) to walk the tightrope of offence.

Then moans about not enough spaces on his blacklist.

 

*edited*

Get a life OP.


Edited by G_Bg_82, 24 June 2019 - 11:55 AM.
edited due to inappropriate content


Gruff_ #13 Posted 23 June 2019 - 07:37 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19297 battles
  • 631
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    09-22-2011

View PostBordhaw, on 23 June 2019 - 05:58 PM, said:

 

What is the use of blacklisting a player though.. none

 

It blocks their chat in battle/ingarage if you encounter them again,so you don't get that pollution, you also get a little mark next to thier name so you can avoid/be aware in battle. 

MeetriX #14 Posted 23 June 2019 - 08:36 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 22838 battles
  • 3,675
  • [_ACE] _ACE
  • Member since:
    08-12-2012

View PostNekoPuffer_PPP, on 23 June 2019 - 06:35 PM, said:

Mine's full too. I'd like a bigger limit.

 

...that clan tag though...:amazed:

 

It is a country in Africa.

Pansenmann #15 Posted 23 June 2019 - 10:18 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 35738 battles
  • 13,512
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

While we're at it, can WG also increase the ´friendlist?

300 people is not enough at all - dingers clans take away most of the space already


Edited by Pansenmann, 23 June 2019 - 10:19 PM.


Homer_J #16 Posted 23 June 2019 - 10:29 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 31689 battles
  • 34,759
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostAmnariel, on 23 June 2019 - 07:06 PM, said:

Blacklist could be used as a guide for WG to ban ppl.The most blacklisted players should be monitorized then banned.

I am sure there are players whos are blacklisted at more than 100players.

They could use the block for this battle option to build a list (and may well do).

 

View PostGruff_, on 23 June 2019 - 07:37 PM, said:

 

It blocks their chat in battle/ingarage if you encounter them again,so you don't get that pollution, you also get a little mark next to thier name so you can avoid/be aware in battle. 

What, the one in 800,000 chance you will meet them again?  And they just happen to be in the same mood?  Yeah, pointless.

 

Block for the one battle and don't worry about the size of the list.  WG aren't going to use up precious database space for you.



Bordhaw #17 Posted 23 June 2019 - 10:38 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 14128 battles
  • 4,325
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostGruff_, on 23 June 2019 - 06:37 PM, said:

 

It blocks their chat in battle/ingarage if you encounter them again,so you don't get that pollution, you also get a little mark next to thier name so you can avoid/be aware in battle. 

 

Exactly... of no use then.

 



TheComfyChair #18 Posted 23 June 2019 - 11:55 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 8717 battles
  • 1,100
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    03-20-2017
My Non-Binary Gender fluid attack helicopter list is not that full. I find the crazy rants entertaining. :B

7thSyndicate #19 Posted 24 June 2019 - 01:41 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46603 battles
  • 577
  • Member since:
    10-09-2012
Better than blacklisting someone is trolling them till they quit talking bs... thats how i do it. You guys are missing all the fun

SuNo_TeSLa #20 Posted 24 June 2019 - 08:44 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 44518 battles
  • 371
  • [SWEPH] SWEPH
  • Member since:
    07-07-2013
Mine is jam-packed with *edited* and arty-players :hiding:

Edited by G_Bg_82, 24 June 2019 - 11:56 AM.
edited due to inappropriate content






Also tagged with blacklist, blacklist limit, increase limit

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users