Jump to content


Type 62: Gotta Flank'Em All!


  • Please log in to reply
56 replies to this topic

8126Jakobsson #41 Posted 02 July 2019 - 03:29 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 80873 battles
  • 5,625
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostTheArk_2014, on 02 July 2019 - 03:12 PM, said:

 

Sorry mate ... but from the tier VIII tech tree light tanks, only the HWK 12 has 400 meters basic view range, all others have 380 and below …

 

:)

 

No need to apologize. HWK have 410 and Bulldog 400. That's like two more than zero. 

TheArk_2014 #42 Posted 02 July 2019 - 03:33 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 68054 battles
  • 1,625
  • [_ARK_] _ARK_
  • Member since:
    01-03-2014

View Post8126Jakobsson, on 02 July 2019 - 02:29 PM, said:

 

No need to apologize. HWK have 410 and Bulldog 400. That's like two more than zero. 

 

Mate, don't look at your game client comparison tool ... look at this page:

https://worldoftanks.eu/en/tankopedia/#wot&w_m=tanks&w_t=lightTank&w_l=8

 

The Bulldog has 380 view range and the HWK 12 has 400.


Edited by TheArk_2014, 02 July 2019 - 03:38 PM.


8126Jakobsson #43 Posted 02 July 2019 - 03:49 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 80873 battles
  • 5,625
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostTheArk_2014, on 02 July 2019 - 03:33 PM, said:

 

Mate, don't look at your game client comparison tool ... look at this page:

https://worldoftanks.eu/en/tankopedia/#wot&w_m=tanks&w_t=lightTank&w_l=8

 

The Bulldog has 380 view range and the HWK 12 has 400.

 

This is getting confusing. I shouldn't go after the number that the game is telling me that the tanks have? I mean I go to the tech tree and see what view range the turret says it has. And that's not the way to see what its view range is? 

 



TheArk_2014 #44 Posted 02 July 2019 - 03:59 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 68054 battles
  • 1,625
  • [_ARK_] _ARK_
  • Member since:
    01-03-2014

View Post8126Jakobsson, on 02 July 2019 - 02:49 PM, said:

 

This is getting confusing. I shouldn't go after the number that the game is telling me that the tanks have? I mean I go to the tech tree and see what view range the turret says it has. And that's not the way to see what its view range is? 

 

 

No, ... if you own a tank, the client comparison tool shows the statistics of the tank as it is with all the additional modules/food/crew skills, etc. ...

... when you want to see the raw/stock stats of a tank, you need to click on the "Configure" button that exists under the tank's image (at the tank's stats column) and from the panel that appears you have to remove EVERYTHING from the tank ...

 

... no need to worry, this method does not originally removes anything from your tank, it works only for the comparison tool.


Edited by TheArk_2014, 02 July 2019 - 04:05 PM.


8126Jakobsson #45 Posted 02 July 2019 - 04:09 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 80873 battles
  • 5,625
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostTheArk_2014, on 02 July 2019 - 03:59 PM, said:

 

No, ... if you own a tank, the client comparison tool shows the statistics of the tank as it is with all the additional modules/food/crew skills, etc. ...

... when you want to see the raw/stock stats of a tank, you need to click on the "Configure" button that exists under the tank's image (at the tank's stats column) and from the panel that appears you have to remove EVERYTHING from the tank ...

 

... no need to worry, this method does not originally removes anything from your tank, it works only for the comparison tool.

 

Never used that comparison tool but your numbers seem correct if we are talking about stock configurations. I was not aware that we use stock numbers when we talk about tank performance nowadays. My bad.

TheArk_2014 #46 Posted 02 July 2019 - 04:11 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 68054 battles
  • 1,625
  • [_ARK_] _ARK_
  • Member since:
    01-03-2014

View Post8126Jakobsson, on 02 July 2019 - 03:09 PM, said:

 

Never used that comparison tool but your numbers seem correct if we are talking about stock configurations. I was not aware that we use stock numbers when we talk about tank performance nowadays. My bad.

 

 

:)



geoff99 #47 Posted 02 July 2019 - 04:39 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 43324 battles
  • 317
  • [SPIKE] SPIKE
  • Member since:
    09-20-2012

Clearly you assess performance when elite. It makes no sense to do so with stock configuration. Stock is temporary until you free so or grind the modules.

 

So yes, type 62 has very good view range for tier 7, but some t8 lights are better. The hwk12 and 30 are best in class at 410m.



Bordhaw #48 Posted 02 July 2019 - 06:34 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 15308 battles
  • 5,225
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostCommunity, on 02 July 2019 - 05:00 AM, said:

If you see a Type 62, it's too late: you've been flanked!
<a href="https://worldoftanks.eu/en/news/special-offers/type-62-collectors-gem/">The full text of the news item</a>

 

View PostKarasu_Hidesuke, on 02 July 2019 - 01:55 PM, said:

Sorry, not my Type.

 



Karasu_Hidesuke #49 Posted 02 July 2019 - 07:51 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 17144 battles
  • 4,678
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View Postgeoff99, on 02 July 2019 - 03:39 PM, said:

Clearly you assess performance when elite. It makes no sense to do so with stock configuration. Stock is temporary until you free so or grind the modules.

 

So yes, type 62 has very good view range for tier 7, but some t8 lights are better. The hwk12 and 30 are best in class at 410m.

 

But how many battles would you play with stock or near stock configuration as opposed to elited vehicle? Assuming you don't make use of generous amounts of free xp.

8126Jakobsson #50 Posted 02 July 2019 - 08:15 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 80873 battles
  • 5,625
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View Postgeoff99, on 02 July 2019 - 04:39 PM, said:

Clearly you assess performance when elite. It makes no sense to do so with stock configuration. Stock is temporary until you free so or grind the modules.

 

So yes, type 62 has very good view range for tier 7, but some t8 lights are better. The hwk12 and 30 are best in class at 410m.

 

E50 has 135 alpha damage. Type 62 > E50.   :bajan: 

mario_awario #51 Posted 02 July 2019 - 08:53 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 23117 battles
  • 40
  • Member since:
    09-26-2012

View PostTheArk_2014, on 02 July 2019 - 09:32 AM, said:

 

PLZ, next time use the Comparison Tools (or learn how to use them) before you post statistics about tanks.

 

 

I used a far superior Comparison Tool than any website - it's called gameplay expierience :)

You should try that :)

 



DrewPeacock_1 #52 Posted 02 July 2019 - 11:20 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 26731 battles
  • 91
  • [T_I_A] T_I_A
  • Member since:
    08-06-2015

View Postreklakazala, on 02 July 2019 - 07:13 AM, said:

 

falcon, its falcon not eagle

 

And shouldn't that be in World of Warplanes. Surely he should be holding out for an Imperial At-AT. 

Edited by DrewPeacock_1, 02 July 2019 - 11:20 PM.


Nethraniel #53 Posted 04 July 2019 - 06:44 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 14564 battles
  • 2,572
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012
Does the title mean we get conpletely reworked maps? So that we can acutally flank? 

TheArk_2014 #54 Posted 04 July 2019 - 09:31 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 68054 battles
  • 1,625
  • [_ARK_] _ARK_
  • Member since:
    01-03-2014

View Postmario_awario, on 02 July 2019 - 07:53 PM, said:

 

I used a far superior Comparison Tool than any website - it's called gameplay expierience :)

You should try that :)

 

 

65.811 battles (almost 20 k of them with tier VI Light Tanks vs tier IX and even vs tier X tanks) and a few thousand more battles on mods which the battles are not counted at the total battle amount ...

... Hmmmm, yes, I do not have game-play experience ... I will try to play a little more.

 

:rolleyes:


Edited by TheArk_2014, 04 July 2019 - 09:39 AM.


parim1331 #55 Posted 04 July 2019 - 10:00 AM

    Polish Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 7630 battles
  • 1,373
  • Member since:
    05-11-2012

I don't want to be picky, but wasn't it "Millennium Falcon"?

Also, what do you think about Millennium Sea gull?


Edited by Sael_, 09 July 2019 - 10:42 AM.


tomatoRNGmaster #56 Posted 04 July 2019 - 10:11 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 38773 battles
  • 12,522
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View Postparim1331, on 04 July 2019 - 10:00 AM, said:

I don't want to be picky, but wasn't it "Millennium Falcon"?

Also, what do you think about Millennium Sea gull?

I don't want to be picky, but wasn't it "Millennium Falcon"?

Also, what do you think about Millennium Sea gull?

I don't want to be picky, but wasn't it "Millennium Falcon"?

Also, what do you think about Millennium Sea gull?

 

Had a rough night?

Sael_ #57 Posted 09 July 2019 - 10:42 AM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 1145 battles
  • 1,165
  • Member since:
    09-26-2016

View PostVonniVidiVici, on 04 July 2019 - 09:11 AM, said:

 

Had a rough night?

 

More like, connection issues. :D

Fixed.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users