Jump to content


special tech tree for public tests with reward vehicles


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

Poll: reward vehicles in the public tests (9 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

would you like wg to add a special tech tree only for public tests with the reward vehicles ? (907-vk72-is5 etc)

  1. Yes (5 votes [50.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  2. No (5 votes [50.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

Vote Hide poll

ntava #1 Posted 05 July 2019 - 02:32 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19869 battles
  • 5
  • [TAKE] TAKE
  • Member since:
    08-04-2013

As the title says this is a suggestion / request to WG to add a new tech tree only for the public test server

The tech tree should include all reward vehicles from clan wars-missions etc

 

I believe the public test server is a great place to allow people to test these tanks as well besides the changes for each patch

Now i know if something like that happens it will be 10-15 279(e)/chieftains per team so add a 5-10 game max per day for ALL the vehicles in that tech tree

Meaning you play 10 279 games and you are done for the day with these tanks. or you can do 3 907 games 3 vk72 games and 4 260 games for example

 

Theres no way to test any of these tanks for players that dont have them

please comment and take a second to vote 

It shouldnt be hard for WG to make it happen and since the 5-10 games limit the mm wont be toxic i believe

 

 


Edited by ntava, 05 July 2019 - 03:26 PM.


4nt #2 Posted 05 July 2019 - 03:02 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 27778 battles
  • 991
  • Member since:
    04-09-2013
Sorry but no. It'd render public test into CW/reward tank fest, as us plebs who have no chance to get 'em would just dl PT and scoot about with them. Better would be separate test server with only reward tanks plus new reward tanks, with rotating roster and almost no gold.

Homer_J #3 Posted 05 July 2019 - 03:21 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 31689 battles
  • 34,759
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010
Awesome, we have not had a poll where you can vote for all the answers in a while.

Balc0ra #4 Posted 05 July 2019 - 03:24 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 70945 battles
  • 19,592
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
The only thing that would happen then is 15 vs 15 Obj 907 games or tier X games full of 907 so you can't test the new tier X. Because let's be honest. You would not test the M60, or the tier 8 or 7 rewards either over that one.

ntava #5 Posted 05 July 2019 - 03:29 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19869 battles
  • 5
  • [TAKE] TAKE
  • Member since:
    08-04-2013

View Post4nt, on 05 July 2019 - 03:02 PM, said:

Sorry but no. It'd render public test into CW/reward tank fest, as us plebs who have no chance to get 'em would just dl PT and scoot about with them. Better would be separate test server with only reward tanks plus new reward tanks, with rotating roster and almost no gold.

 

View PostBalc0ra, on 05 July 2019 - 03:24 PM, said:

The only thing that would happen then is 15 vs 15 Obj 907 games or tier X games full of 907 so you can't test the new tier X. Because let's be honest. You would not test the M60, or the tier 8 or 7 rewards either over that one.

 

As i mentioned there should be a 5-10 games limit for all of them each day so its not about spamming them but testing them 

4nt #6 Posted 05 July 2019 - 03:37 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 27778 battles
  • 991
  • Member since:
    04-09-2013

View Postntava, on 05 July 2019 - 03:29 PM, said:

 

 

As i mentioned there should be a 5-10 games limit for all of them each day so its not about spamming them but testing them 

Doesn't really matter. Since vast majority of players cannot achieve 907, for example, even If single player is reduced for 5-10 games it'd still make about 500k tops (little on generous side, but I'd assume some players would return just for a chance to play prize tanks) games in 907. That's lots of games 15 vs 15 907s. Unless you mean 5-10 total games in prize vehicles. Still whole lot of games potentially filled with 907s and such.

 

Arguably, 5-10 games in single vehicle isn't much a test. I have dire doubts about WG just tossing prizes into mix, since that'd shift focus from actual testing of new tech tree tanks and prems.


Edited by 4nt, 05 July 2019 - 03:40 PM.


24doom24 #7 Posted 05 July 2019 - 03:38 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7956 battles
  • 225
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012
It's irrelevant if the test server is testing other things. 

ntava #8 Posted 05 July 2019 - 04:08 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19869 battles
  • 5
  • [TAKE] TAKE
  • Member since:
    08-04-2013

View Post4nt, on 05 July 2019 - 03:37 PM, said:

Doesn't really matter. Since vast majority of players cannot achieve 907, for example, even If single player is reduced for 5-10 games it'd still make about 500k tops (little on generous side, but I'd assume some players would return just for a chance to play prize tanks) games in 907. That's lots of games 15 vs 15 907s. Unless you mean 5-10 total games in prize vehicles. Still whole lot of games potentially filled with 907s and such.

 

Arguably, 5-10 games in single vehicle isn't much a test. I have dire doubts about WG just tossing prizes into mix, since that'd shift focus from actual testing of new tech tree tanks and prems.

 

why would someone return to the game just to play 5 907 games if he's not playing it anymore in the 1st place ?

besides theres so many tanks in every test you could play (not this particular test with the ammo rebalance but the casual patch tests)

you cant deny the fact that theres no way to play with the reward tanks if you dont have them

 

isnt the public test about testing ? 

5 games is more than enough to know if the tank fits your playstyle. and thats the point here. we know that 907 chieftain 279 are really good tanks the thing is does it fit me ?

or do i play a whole campaign and pick something i dont enjoy in the end ?

 

i undestand the fear of the mm being full with them but that can be worked 

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users