Jump to content


Edited


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
25 replies to this topic

APoliticallyCorrectName #1 Posted 10 July 2019 - 10:22 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 28189 battles
  • 61
  • Member since:
    05-21-2015

Edited


Edited by Asklepi0s, 11 July 2019 - 09:46 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


Xandania #2 Posted 10 July 2019 - 10:26 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 40523 battles
  • 1,393
  • [-DGN-] -DGN-
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013

Well, I guess there is loaws and stuff - and even if what you say was true ...

 

Let me put it this way - if you would have build a house yourself and let others live in it, you'd still be able to make the calls if you want to change the rooms or the colour of the shingles, right? ^^



4nt #3 Posted 10 July 2019 - 10:39 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27842 battles
  • 1,011
  • Member since:
    04-09-2013
Only one option. Do your own game, avoiding copyright infringements (not so hard although one needs to avoid also Gaijin and Obsidian IPs), get traction within gaming community and deliver better than WG. Easy peasy.

No really, WoT is essentially unsalvageable taking your list into consideration, it'd Be far easier to start from scratch. Although I'm little concerned about wether tanks actually would be in their correct nations... Here's to new game and Luxemburg tech tree!

Edited by 4nt, 10 July 2019 - 10:41 PM.


MeetriX #4 Posted 10 July 2019 - 10:44 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 22838 battles
  • 3,680
  • [_ACE] _ACE
  • Member since:
    08-12-2012
Buy over 50% of the shares and then you can do what ever you want.

VonniVidiVici #5 Posted 10 July 2019 - 10:46 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 38691 battles
  • 12,519
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013
What exactly did you have in mind? Get the world's most successful kickstarter going and buy the IP from WG? Good luck with that.

BravelyRanAway #6 Posted 10 July 2019 - 10:54 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 24042 battles
  • 11,412
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostAPoliticallyCorrectName, on 10 July 2019 - 09:22 PM, said:

Edited

They've managed to keep you hooked for 28,000 games, I think they know you better than you know yourself.


Edited by Asklepi0s, 11 July 2019 - 09:46 AM.


Homer_J #7 Posted 10 July 2019 - 11:34 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 31717 battles
  • 34,780
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostAPoliticallyCorrectName, on 10 July 2019 - 10:22 PM, said:

Is it even possible? I know it's stupid to put this on WG's forum but... WoT could be so much better, if only WG wouldn't be in charge...

 

/me looks at those other tank games and disagrees.

Balc0ra #8 Posted 10 July 2019 - 11:40 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 70974 battles
  • 19,625
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
Yeah, cus we all know what did happen to that other tank game that did everything the players wanted. That worked out so well for them.

BravelyRanAway #9 Posted 10 July 2019 - 11:42 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 24042 battles
  • 11,412
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostBalc0ra, on 10 July 2019 - 10:40 PM, said:

Yeah, cus we all know what did happen to that other tank game that did everything the players wanted. That worked out so well for them.

Why'd you want to go and ruin a perfectly good Pity Party. :trollface:



Balc0ra #10 Posted 11 July 2019 - 12:14 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 70974 battles
  • 19,625
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 10 July 2019 - 11:42 PM, said:

Why'd you want to go and ruin a perfectly good Pity Party. :trollface:

 

Thing is that if WG made OP happy, and did what he wanted. Someone would still make a post like this complaining that WG never do listen. Because WG did not do what he wanted.

 

With so many players, you get way too many different aspects on what WG should do, and what works or not. As we did see about nerfing gold ammo damage when WG suggested that. There are many different views on that subject. If it will make the game better, or shift power the wrong way etc. Either way... It's not an easy task to please everyone with any change. It's rather impossible. And with some matters they have gathered feedback on. Finding a solution that makes the least people mad, is not easy I suspect. And at times.... doing nothing about something does just that too. As in making the least people mad. Like leaving the KV-5 alone as is vs buffing it.


Edited by Balc0ra, 11 July 2019 - 12:16 AM.


ExclamationMark #11 Posted 11 July 2019 - 12:16 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 16785 battles
  • 4,340
  • [IDEAD] IDEAD
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013
qpranger likes this

Gremlin182 #12 Posted 11 July 2019 - 12:25 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 55419 battles
  • 9,169
  • Member since:
    04-18-2012

Play some other game because there is no other solution to the problem you think you have.

Most people play games they like don't play games they don't like.

You want the entire game to be customised to your specific requirements and the only way that happens is when you write the game or commission it.



onderschepper #13 Posted 11 July 2019 - 12:34 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 2113 battles
  • 529
  • [BOF] BOF
  • Member since:
    05-17-2019

If you are in the UK you could always hope that Wargaming switches from Ltd to PLC, and then buy up all of the shares made available.

 

Alternatively, you could apply for one of the myriad of vacancies currently being advertised by Wargaming and potentially see your ideas brought to fruition that way.

 

Otherwise, as others have said, find a different game that is more suited to your tastes.



Bulldog_Drummond #14 Posted 11 July 2019 - 12:41 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 32561 battles
  • 9,976
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-10-2014

View PostAPoliticallyCorrectName, on 10 July 2019 - 09:22 PM, said:

Edited

 

It is a mark of insincerity of purpose to spend one's time in looking for the sacred Emperor in the low-class tea-shops.

Edited by Asklepi0s, 11 July 2019 - 09:47 AM.


ExclamationMark #15 Posted 11 July 2019 - 12:42 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 16785 battles
  • 4,340
  • [IDEAD] IDEAD
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013
xd

r00barb #16 Posted 11 July 2019 - 12:49 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 26740 battles
  • 10,835
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015


Pattonizer #17 Posted 11 July 2019 - 12:54 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8765 battles
  • 318
  • Member since:
    08-11-2011

View PostHomer_J, on 10 July 2019 - 10:34 PM, said:

 

/me looks at those other tank games and disagrees.

 

Khmmm... Wrrr Thndrrr is a 1000 times better even with its faults. Khmm..



Dorander #18 Posted 11 July 2019 - 01:01 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 21014 battles
  • 5,355
  • Member since:
    05-07-2012

This game has earned them billions. I wish I sucked at game development like that. Kinda hard to "push WG out" when they own the product. They're not some manager that's hired to perform a job, they own every part of it. It's theirs. Not yours, not ours. Theirs. And apparently they've been doing something right, going by small details such as your battlecount, the longevity of the game and the profits made.

 

And don't worry, the stupidity isn't posting this thread on the WoT forums.



CraftyVeteran #19 Posted 11 July 2019 - 02:11 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6687 battles
  • 590
  • [-B2C-] -B2C-
  • Member since:
    05-03-2016

with this behind-the-scenes look at how developers milk players for money, you will never push WG out of this cash cow. Ever.

 

 

 



ThisVehicleHasHadIt #20 Posted 11 July 2019 - 02:24 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 399 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    07-05-2019

 Show me on the doll where the leFH18B2 touched you.

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users